Prev: Simplified EFE
Next: Will Porat answer?
From: cosmojoe on 28 Mar 2010 15:12 LUMINIFEROUS ETHER WIND RAW DATA URL: zyx2.org Title: Luminiferous Ether Wind Raw Data & Analysis Author: Joel Webb This experiment is being performed at the time, date and location shown utilizing an interferometer with two equal length beams of 12", placed at right angles to each other. The north-south beam is a reference beam denoted as X, the other, denoted as Y, is aimed east to the horizon. The apparatus is locked down and does not rotate; utilizing the earth's rotation instead. Due east is always the aiming direction. During March, the orbital progress of the earth and moon around the sun is in line with the Cygnus-Orion axis. On this axis, the apparatus will measure motion based upon two motions: that of the sun's motion of 150 miles/sec (m/s) towards Cygnus (away from Orion) and the earth's orbit around the sun at 18.5 m/s. During other months, this condition is not true. Both beams of light are projected slightly offset (normal in achieving interference fringes) with the X beam stationed to the right of the Y beam, which is rechecked at the conclusion of each run. A fringe count rate is determined by dividing the number of fringes observed passing a screen marker by the duration of the run. The moving fringes represent the change of phase between the two beams of light derived from a single green laser, not the motion of the apparatus through the ether, though such phase variation is directly attributable to this motion. The movement of the fringes may be either in the direction of the X beam spot, or the Y beam spot, depending upon which way the apparatus is moving in relation to the Y beam, as experimentally determined. In the event the apparatus is moving in the same direction of the first leg of the beam of light along the Y beam before it strikes the front surface mirror which sends it back towards the beam splitter cube, the fringes will move towards the projected spot of the Y beam. Conversely, if the apparatus is moving the opposite direction through the ether, the fringes will move towards the projected spot of the X beam. Consequently, observations performed near midday, where, where east is towards Cygnus, because of the earth's rotation, the fringes will move towards the Y beam spot, whereas near midnight, they will move in the opposite direction towards the X beam spot: Cygnus in the direction west, thus opposite the directed laser light along the first leg. Keep in mind that the earth's orbit component is also maximum at noonday and at midnight, at this time of year, near the vernal equinox, and though quite small at 18.5 m/s compared to the galactic rotation component, somewhere around 150 m/s, the remain additive. As convention in this study, galactic spin as viewed from the galactic north pole is clockwise, and considered to be positive motion, in contrast to the earth's counterclockwise orbital and rotational spins, both considered as negative in this accord. All poles, be they galactic, solar or earth are aligned the same, though somewhat tilted to each other. The earth's rotation at this sites latitude is -0.138 m/s; contributing very little to these results. However, earth orbital data should be included in these calculations: (150+18.5) m/s for daytime observations and (150-18.5) m/s for nocturnal observations. Greater accuracy may be achieved by using 1/10 wave optics (I used only 1/4 wave throughout) and by doing vector addition of all motion components utilizing trig cosine function, which might or should include the sun's motion towards Vega, and declination and overall galactic motion of our galaxy relative to the known, observable universe. By doing so, an excellent and no doubt useful expression for null rest for luminiferous ether might be achieved. For now, with the assimilation of a bit more data, a recognizable pattern should emerge showing a greater fringe rate for observations taken where the Y beam is parallel to the Orion-Cygnus axis, with a consistent correspondence between the direction of fringe travel and the apparatus' directed motion through the ether. LUMINIFEROUS ETHER WIND RAW DATA JOURNAL ENTRY SITE LOCATION: 210 05.116 N 1560 59.806 ELEV. 194 FT HAWAIIAN STANDARD TIME DATE IN OUT FRINGE COUNT DIRECTION TEMP MOON COMMENTS 3/17/2010 11:40 AM 11:44 AM 3 LEFT (Y) 3/17/2010 1:25 PM 1:45 PM 15 LEFT (Y) 3/17/2010 5:11 PM 5:17 PM 1 RIGHT(X) 3/18/2010 4:50 AM 5:00 AM 1 X 3/20/2010 3:00 AM 3:10 AM 1 X 3/20/2010 1.12 PM 1:15 PM 3 Y 3/21/2010 2:22 PM 2:28 PM 4 Y 3/21/2010 7:07 AM 7:20 AM 8 X 3/21/2010 9:14 AM 9:25 AM 7 Y 3/21/2010 12:06 PM 12:17 PM 8 Y 3/21/2010 3:12 PM 3:21 PM 10 X 3/21/2010 5:50 PM 6:02 PM 3 X 78 1/4 3/21/2010 9:00 PM 78 1/4 3/22/2010 7:16 AM 70 3/22/2010 7:21 AM 7:25 AM 6 X 3/22/2010 12:53 PM 1:01 PM 17 Y 81 3/22/2010 6:57 PM 6:59 PM 2 X 78 3/23/2010 12:27 AM 12:31 AM 4 Y 72 3/24/2010 12:22 PM 81 HIGH WINDS * ETHER WIND ANALYSIS LEDGER #1 DATE IN OUT DURATION FRINGE COUNT RATE DIR COMMENTS 3/17/2010 11:40 AM 11:44 AM 4 3 0.75 Y DAYTIME 3/17/2010 1:25 PM 1:45 PM 20 15 1.33 Y DAYTIME 3/17/2010 5:11 PM 5:17 PM 6 1 0.16 X 3/18/2010 4:50 AM 5:00 AM 10 1 0.10 X 3/20/2010 3:00 AM 3:10 AM 10 1 0.10 X 3/20/2010 1:12 PM 1:15 PM 3 3 1.0 Y DAYTIME 3/20/2010 2:22 PM 2:28 PM 6 4 0.66 Y DAYTIME 3/21/2010 7:07 AM 7:20 AM 13 8 0.61 X 3/21/2010 9:14 AM 9:25 AM 11 7 0.63 Y DAYTIME 3/21/2010 12:06 PM 12:17 PM 11 8 0.73 Y DAYTIME 3/21/2010 3:12 PM 3:21 PM 9 10 1.11 X 3/21/2010 5:50 PM 6:02 PM 12 3 0.02 X 3/22/2010 7:21 AM 7:25 AM 4 6 1.5 X 3/22/2010 12:53 PM 1:01 PM 8 17 2.12 Y DAYTIME 3/22/2010 6:57 PM 6:59 PM 2 2 1.0 X 3/23/2010 12:27 AM 12:31 AM 4 4 1.0 Y 3/24/2010 Earth orbit reading are taken at 12:00 noon solar time and then again twelve hours later at midnight. Readings for galactic spin, towards or away from Cygnus, are taken when the Milky Way circles the horizon. Under the condition of cloud cover, use a sidereal star atlas. If you are having problems, give me a call: (808) 553-3456
From: xxein on 28 Mar 2010 19:54 On Mar 28, 3:12 pm, cosmojoe <cosmo...(a)hawaiiantel.net> wrote: > LUMINIFEROUS ETHER WIND RAW DATA > URL: zyx2.org Title: Luminiferous Ether Wind Raw Data & > Analysis Author: Joel Webb > > This experiment is being performed at the time, date and location > shown utilizing an > interferometer with two equal length beams of 12", placed at right > angles to each other. > The north-south beam is a reference beam denoted as X, the other, > denoted as Y, is aimed > east to the horizon. The apparatus is locked down and does not rotate; > utilizing the earth's > rotation instead. Due east is always the aiming direction. > During March, the orbital progress of the earth and moon around the > sun is in line with > the Cygnus-Orion axis. > On this axis, the apparatus will measure motion based upon two > motions: that of the > sun's motion of 150 miles/sec (m/s) towards Cygnus (away from Orion) and > the earth's orbit > around the sun at 18.5 m/s. During other months, this condition is not > true. > Both beams of light are projected slightly offset (normal in > achieving interference > fringes) with the X beam stationed to the right of the Y beam, which is > rechecked at the > conclusion of each run. > A fringe count rate is determined by dividing the number of fringes > observed passing a > screen marker by the duration of the run. > The moving fringes represent the change of phase between the two > beams of light > derived from a single green laser, not the motion of the apparatus > through the ether, > though such phase variation is directly attributable to this motion. > The movement of the fringes may be either in the direction of the X > beam spot, or the Y > beam spot, depending upon which way the apparatus is moving in relation > to the Y beam, as > experimentally determined. > In the event the apparatus is moving in the same direction of the > first leg of the beam of > light along the Y beam before it strikes the front surface mirror which > sends it back > towards the beam splitter cube, the fringes will move towards the > projected spot of the Y > beam. > Conversely, if the apparatus is moving the opposite direction > through the ether, the > fringes will move towards the projected spot of the X beam. > Consequently, observations performed near midday, where, where east > is towards > Cygnus, because of the earth's rotation, the fringes will move towards > the Y beam spot, > whereas near midnight, they will move in the opposite direction towards > the X beam spot: > Cygnus in the direction west, thus opposite the directed laser light > along the first leg. > Keep in mind that the earth's orbit component is also maximum at > noonday and at > midnight, at this time of year, near the vernal equinox, and though > quite small at 18.5 m/s > compared to the galactic rotation component, somewhere around 150 m/s, > the remain > additive. > As convention in this study, galactic spin as viewed from the > galactic north pole is > clockwise, and considered to be positive motion, in contrast to the > earth's counterclockwise > orbital and rotational spins, both considered as negative in this > accord. All poles, be they > galactic, solar or earth are aligned the same, though somewhat tilted to > each other. > The earth's rotation at this sites latitude is -0.138 m/s; > contributing very little to these > results. However, earth orbital data should be included in these > calculations: (150+18.5) > m/s for daytime observations and (150-18.5) m/s for nocturnal observations. > Greater accuracy may be achieved by using 1/10 wave optics (I used > only 1/4 wave > throughout) and by doing vector addition of all motion components > utilizing trig cosine > function, which might or should include the sun's motion towards Vega, > and declination and > overall galactic motion of our galaxy relative to the known, observable > universe. > By doing so, an excellent and no doubt useful expression for null > rest for luminiferous > ether might be achieved. > For now, with the assimilation of a bit more data, a recognizable > pattern should emerge > showing a greater fringe rate for observations taken where the Y beam is > parallel to the > Orion-Cygnus axis, with a consistent correspondence between the > direction of fringe travel > and the apparatus' directed motion through the ether. > > LUMINIFEROUS ETHER WIND RAW DATA JOURNAL ENTRY > SITE LOCATION: 210 05.116 N 1560 59.806 ELEV. 194 FT > HAWAIIAN STANDARD TIME > DATE IN OUT FRINGE COUNT DIRECTION TEMP MOON COMMENTS > 3/17/2010 > 11:40 AM > 11:44 AM > 3 > LEFT (Y) > > 3/17/2010 > 1:25 PM > 1:45 PM > 15 > LEFT (Y) > > 3/17/2010 > 5:11 PM > 5:17 PM > 1 > RIGHT(X) > > 3/18/2010 > 4:50 AM > 5:00 AM > 1 > X > > 3/20/2010 > 3:00 AM > 3:10 AM > 1 > X > > 3/20/2010 > 1.12 PM > 1:15 PM > 3 > Y > > 3/21/2010 > 2:22 PM > 2:28 PM > 4 > Y > > 3/21/2010 > 7:07 AM > 7:20 AM > 8 > X > > 3/21/2010 > 9:14 AM > 9:25 AM > 7 > Y > > 3/21/2010 > 12:06 PM > 12:17 PM > 8 > Y > > 3/21/2010 > 3:12 PM > 3:21 PM > 10 > X > > 3/21/2010 > 5:50 PM > 6:02 PM > 3 > X > 78 > 1/4 > > 3/21/2010 > 9:00 PM > > 78 > 1/4 > > 3/22/2010 > 7:16 AM > > 70 > > 3/22/2010 > 7:21 AM > 7:25 AM > 6 > X > > 3/22/2010 > 12:53 PM > 1:01 PM > 17 > Y > 81 > > 3/22/2010 > 6:57 PM > 6:59 PM > 2 > X > 78 > > 3/23/2010 > 12:27 AM > 12:31 AM > 4 > Y > 72 > > 3/24/2010 > 12:22 PM > > 81 > > HIGH WINDS > > * > > ETHER WIND ANALYSIS LEDGER #1 > DATE > IN > OUT > DURATION > FRINGE > COUNT > RATE > DIR > > COMMENTS > 3/17/2010 > 11:40 AM > 11:44 AM > 4 > 3 > 0.75 > Y > DAYTIME > 3/17/2010 > 1:25 PM > 1:45 PM > 20 > 15 > 1.33 > Y > DAYTIME > 3/17/2010 > 5:11 PM > 5:17 PM > 6 > 1 > 0.16 > X > > 3/18/2010 > 4:50 AM > 5:00 AM > 10 > 1 > 0.10 > X > > 3/20/2010 > 3:00 AM > 3:10 AM > 10 > 1 > 0.10 > X > > 3/20/2010 > 1:12 PM > 1:15 PM > 3 > 3 > 1.0 > Y > DAYTIME > 3/20/2010 > 2:22 PM > 2:28 PM > 6 > 4 > 0.66 > Y > DAYTIME > 3/21/2010 > 7:07 AM > 7:20 AM > 13 > 8 > 0.61 > X > > 3/21/2010 > 9:14 AM > 9:25 AM > 11 > 7 > 0.63 > Y > DAYTIME > 3/21/2010 > 12:06 PM > 12:17 PM > 11 > 8 > 0.73 > Y > DAYTIME > 3/21/2010 > 3:12 PM > 3:21 PM > 9 > 10 > 1.11 > X > > 3/21/2010 > 5:50 PM > 6:02 PM > 12 > 3 > 0.02 > X > > 3/22/2010 > 7:21 AM > 7:25 AM > 4 > 6 > 1.5 > X > > 3/22/2010 > 12:53 PM > 1:01 PM > 8 > 17 > 2.12 > Y > DAYTIME > 3/22/2010 > 6:57 PM > 6:59 PM > 2 > 2 > 1.0 > X > > 3/23/2010 > 12:27 AM > 12:31 AM > 4 > 4 > 1.0 > Y > > 3/24/2010 > > Earth orbit reading are taken at 12:00 noon solar time and then > again twelve hours later > at midnight. > Readings for galactic spin, towards or away from Cygnus, are taken > when the Milky > Way circles the horizon. Under the condition of cloud cover, use a > sidereal star atlas. > If you are having problems, give me a call: (808) 553-3456 xxein: Is this an observation or a calculation?
From: cosmojoe on 28 Mar 2010 22:35 xxein wrote: > On Mar 28, 3:12 pm, cosmojoe <cosmo...(a)hawaiiantel.net> wrote: > >>LUMINIFEROUS ETHER WIND RAW DATA >> URL: zyx2.org Title: Luminiferous Ether Wind Raw Data & >>Analysis Author: Joel Webb >> >> This experiment is being performed at the time, date and location >>shown utilizing an >>interferometer with two equal length beams of 12", placed at right >>angles to each other. >>The north-south beam is a reference beam denoted as X, the other, >>denoted as Y, is aimed >>east to the horizon. The apparatus is locked down and does not rotate; >> utilizing the earth's >>rotation instead. Due east is always the aiming direction. >> During March, the orbital progress of the earth and moon around the >>sun is in line with >>the Cygnus-Orion axis. >> On this axis, the apparatus will measure motion based upon two >>motions: that of the >>sun's motion of 150 miles/sec (m/s) towards Cygnus (away from Orion) and >>the earth's orbit >>around the sun at 18.5 m/s. During other months, this condition is not >>true. >> Both beams of light are projected slightly offset (normal in >>achieving interference >>fringes) with the X beam stationed to the right of the Y beam, which is >>rechecked at the >>conclusion of each run. >> A fringe count rate is determined by dividing the number of fringes >>observed passing a >>screen marker by the duration of the run. >> The moving fringes represent the change of phase between the two >>beams of light >>derived from a single green laser, not the motion of the apparatus >>through the ether, >>though such phase variation is directly attributable to this motion. >> The movement of the fringes may be either in the direction of the X >>beam spot, or the Y >>beam spot, depending upon which way the apparatus is moving in relation >>to the Y beam, as >>experimentally determined. >> In the event the apparatus is moving in the same direction of the >>first leg of the beam of >>light along the Y beam before it strikes the front surface mirror which >>sends it back >>towards the beam splitter cube, the fringes will move towards the >>projected spot of the Y >>beam. >> Conversely, if the apparatus is moving the opposite direction >>through the ether, the >>fringes will move towards the projected spot of the X beam. >> Consequently, observations performed near midday, where, where east >>is towards >>Cygnus, because of the earth's rotation, the fringes will move towards >>the Y beam spot, >>whereas near midnight, they will move in the opposite direction towards >>the X beam spot: >>Cygnus in the direction west, thus opposite the directed laser light >>along the first leg. >> Keep in mind that the earth's orbit component is also maximum at >>noonday and at >>midnight, at this time of year, near the vernal equinox, and though >>quite small at 18.5 m/s >>compared to the galactic rotation component, somewhere around 150 m/s, >>the remain >>additive. >> As convention in this study, galactic spin as viewed from the >>galactic north pole is >>clockwise, and considered to be positive motion, in contrast to the >>earth's counterclockwise >>orbital and rotational spins, both considered as negative in this >>accord. All poles, be they >>galactic, solar or earth are aligned the same, though somewhat tilted to >>each other. >> The earth's rotation at this sites latitude is -0.138 m/s; >>contributing very little to these >>results. However, earth orbital data should be included in these >>calculations: (150+18.5) >>m/s for daytime observations and (150-18.5) m/s for nocturnal observations. >> Greater accuracy may be achieved by using 1/10 wave optics (I used >>only 1/4 wave >>throughout) and by doing vector addition of all motion components >>utilizing trig cosine >>function, which might or should include the sun's motion towards Vega, >>and declination and >>overall galactic motion of our galaxy relative to the known, observable >>universe. >> By doing so, an excellent and no doubt useful expression for null >>rest for luminiferous >>ether might be achieved. >> For now, with the assimilation of a bit more data, a recognizable >>pattern should emerge >>showing a greater fringe rate for observations taken where the Y beam is >>parallel to the >>Orion-Cygnus axis, with a consistent correspondence between the >>direction of fringe travel >>and the apparatus' directed motion through the ether. >> >> LUMINIFEROUS ETHER WIND RAW DATA JOURNAL ENTRY >> SITE LOCATION: 210 05.116 N 1560 59.806 ELEV. 194 FT >> HAWAIIAN STANDARD TIME >> DATE IN OUT FRINGE COUNT DIRECTION TEMP MOON COMMENTS >> 3/17/2010 >> 11:40 AM >> 11:44 AM >> 3 >> LEFT (Y) >> >> 3/17/2010 >> 1:25 PM >> 1:45 PM >> 15 >> LEFT (Y) >> >> 3/17/2010 >> 5:11 PM >> 5:17 PM >> 1 >> RIGHT(X) >> >> 3/18/2010 >> 4:50 AM >> 5:00 AM >> 1 >> X >> >> 3/20/2010 >> 3:00 AM >> 3:10 AM >> 1 >> X >> >> 3/20/2010 >> 1.12 PM >> 1:15 PM >> 3 >> Y >> >> 3/21/2010 >> 2:22 PM >> 2:28 PM >> 4 >> Y >> >> 3/21/2010 >> 7:07 AM >> 7:20 AM >> 8 >> X >> >> 3/21/2010 >> 9:14 AM >> 9:25 AM >> 7 >> Y >> >> 3/21/2010 >> 12:06 PM >> 12:17 PM >> 8 >> Y >> >> 3/21/2010 >> 3:12 PM >> 3:21 PM >> 10 >> X >> >> 3/21/2010 >> 5:50 PM >> 6:02 PM >> 3 >> X >> 78 >> 1/4 >> >> 3/21/2010 >> 9:00 PM >> >> 78 >> 1/4 >> >> 3/22/2010 >> 7:16 AM >> >> 70 >> >> 3/22/2010 >> 7:21 AM >> 7:25 AM >> 6 >> X >> >> 3/22/2010 >> 12:53 PM >> 1:01 PM >> 17 >> Y >> 81 >> >> 3/22/2010 >> 6:57 PM >> 6:59 PM >> 2 >> X >> 78 >> >> 3/23/2010 >> 12:27 AM >> 12:31 AM >> 4 >> Y >> 72 >> >> 3/24/2010 >> 12:22 PM >> >> 81 >> >> HIGH WINDS >> >> * >> >> ETHER WIND ANALYSIS LEDGER #1 >> DATE >> IN >> OUT >> DURATION >> FRINGE >> COUNT >> RATE >> DIR >> >>COMMENTS >> 3/17/2010 >> 11:40 AM >> 11:44 AM >> 4 >> 3 >> 0.75 >> Y >> DAYTIME >> 3/17/2010 >> 1:25 PM >> 1:45 PM >> 20 >> 15 >> 1.33 >> Y >> DAYTIME >> 3/17/2010 >> 5:11 PM >> 5:17 PM >> 6 >> 1 >> 0.16 >> X >> >> 3/18/2010 >> 4:50 AM >> 5:00 AM >> 10 >> 1 >> 0.10 >> X >> >> 3/20/2010 >> 3:00 AM >> 3:10 AM >> 10 >> 1 >> 0.10 >> X >> >> 3/20/2010 >> 1:12 PM >> 1:15 PM >> 3 >> 3 >> 1.0 >> Y >> DAYTIME >> 3/20/2010 >> 2:22 PM >> 2:28 PM >> 6 >> 4 >> 0.66 >> Y >> DAYTIME >> 3/21/2010 >> 7:07 AM >> 7:20 AM >> 13 >> 8 >> 0.61 >> X >> >> 3/21/2010 >> 9:14 AM >> 9:25 AM >> 11 >> 7 >> 0.63 >> Y >> DAYTIME >> 3/21/2010 >> 12:06 PM >> 12:17 PM >> 11 >> 8 >> 0.73 >> Y >> DAYTIME >> 3/21/2010 >> 3:12 PM >> 3:21 PM >> 9 >> 10 >> 1.11 >> X >> >> 3/21/2010 >> 5:50 PM >> 6:02 PM >> 12 >> 3 >> 0.02 >> X >> >> 3/22/2010 >> 7:21 AM >> 7:25 AM >> 4 >> 6 >> 1.5 >> X >> >> 3/22/2010 >> 12:53 PM >> 1:01 PM >> 8 >> 17 >> 2.12 >> Y >> DAYTIME >> 3/22/2010 >> 6:57 PM >> 6:59 PM >> 2 >> 2 >> 1.0 >> X >> >> 3/23/2010 >> 12:27 AM >> 12:31 AM >> 4 >> 4 >> 1.0 >> Y >> >> 3/24/2010 >> >> Earth orbit reading are taken at 12:00 noon solar time and then >>again twelve hours later >>at midnight. >> Readings for galactic spin, towards or away from Cygnus, are taken >>when the Milky >>Way circles the horizon. Under the condition of cloud cover, use a >>sidereal star atlas. >> If you are having problems, give me a call: (808) 553-3456 > > > xxein: Is this an observation or a calculation? It is an observation and measurement.
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Simplified EFE Next: Will Porat answer? |