Large Radio Telescope Orbiting Moon.
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Largest scientific instrument ever built to prove Einstein'stheory of general relativity
Next: Primitive Radiometer Studies
From: Ken S. Tucker on 13 May 2010 18:43 Some have made the valid suggestion of placing a radio telescope on the 'far side' of the moon, to sheild Earths RF, but that is quite an expensive challenge for anything large, it means soft landing the RT (Radio Telescope) and then subjecting the structure to 1/6 g-force. However if we were to Orbit the RT around the Moon, it's structure would be in nil g (weightless), and would have 'periodic' sheilding at which time it would be shielded from Earth's RF. The unit would be solar powered, subtle orientation by gyros. Highly advanced Unified Field Theory predict that so-called g-waves will actually be detected as ElectroMagnetic Radiation, at the same frequency and energy as conventional GR math predicts for orbital decays, thus requiring a very sensitive EMR detector. An example of an applied UFT based on GR can be found here, http://physics.trak4.com/GR_Charge_Couple.pdf that enables the prediction of the orbital decay appearing as EMR. Apart from that application astronomers will have great benefit from doing Radio Astronomy during those ultra quiet periods. Regards Ken S. Tucker
From: Ken S. Tucker on 13 May 2010 20:47 On May 13, 4:47 pm, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Ken S. Tucker wrote: > > Some have made the valid suggestion of placing a radio telescope > > on the 'far side' of the moon, to sheild Earths RF, but that is quite > > an expensive challenge for anything large, it means soft landing > > the RT (Radio Telescope) and then subjecting the structure to 1/6 > > g-force. > > However if we were to Orbit the RT around the Moon, it's structure > > would be in nil g (weightless), and would have 'periodic' sheilding at > > which time it would be shielded from Earth's RF. > > The unit would be solar powered, subtle orientation by gyros. > > ...really, Ken? How big is a radio telescope, even if built optimistically? Further questions should be directed to the DoD. Ken
From: eric gisse on 13 May 2010 21:41 Ken S. Tucker wrote: > On May 13, 4:47 pm, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> Ken S. Tucker wrote: >> > Some have made the valid suggestion of placing a radio telescope >> > on the 'far side' of the moon, to sheild Earths RF, but that is quite >> > an expensive challenge for anything large, it means soft landing >> > the RT (Radio Telescope) and then subjecting the structure to 1/6 >> > g-force. >> > However if we were to Orbit the RT around the Moon, it's structure >> > would be in nil g (weightless), and would have 'periodic' sheilding at >> > which time it would be shielded from Earth's RF. >> > The unit would be solar powered, subtle orientation by gyros. >> >> ...really, Ken? How big is a radio telescope, even if built >> optimistically? > > Further questions should be directed to the DoD. > Ken Looks like you are willing to repeat your stooopidities but don't have the balls to defend them.
From: Ken S. Tucker on 13 May 2010 22:24
On May 13, 6:41 pm, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Ken S. Tucker wrote: > > On May 13, 4:47 pm, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Ken S. Tucker wrote: > >> > Some have made the valid suggestion of placing a radio telescope > >> > on the 'far side' of the moon, to sheild Earths RF, but that is quite > >> > an expensive challenge for anything large, it means soft landing > >> > the RT (Radio Telescope) and then subjecting the structure to 1/6 > >> > g-force. > >> > However if we were to Orbit the RT around the Moon, it's structure > >> > would be in nil g (weightless), and would have 'periodic' sheilding at > >> > which time it would be shielded from Earth's RF. > >> > The unit would be solar powered, subtle orientation by gyros. > > >> ...really, Ken? How big is a radio telescope, even if built > >> optimistically? > > > Further questions should be directed to the DoD. > > Ken > > Looks like you are willing to repeat your stooopidities but don't have the > balls to defend them. LOL sissy gisse, write a letter to your congressman, ask for clearance, you're out, no chance, but try, and get back to me with your reply from him, that's a hoot. Ken |