Prev: It's possible to get pg_class oid from GETSTRUC macro?
Next: 9.0beta2 - server crash when using HS + SR
From: Bruce Momjian on 13 Jun 2010 10:00
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of jue jun 10 11:46:25 -0400 2010:
> >
> > > Yes, the folks at commandprompt need to be told about this. Loudly.
> > > It's a serious packaging error.
> >
> > Just notified Lacey, the packager (not so loudly, though); she's working
> > on new packages, and apologizes for the inconvenience.
>
> [ Thread moved to hackers. 8.4.4 RPMs were built with debug flags. ]
>
> Uh, where are we on this? Has it been completed? How are people
> informed about this? Do we need to post to the announce email list?
> Does Yum just update them? How did this mistake happen? How many days
> did it take to detect the problem?
>
> Why has no news been posted here?
>
> https://public.commandprompt.com/projects/pgcore/news

Why have I received no reply to this email? Do people think this is not
a serious issue? I know it is a weekend but the problem was identified
on Thursday, meaning there was a full workday for someone from
CommandPrompt to reply to the issue and report a status:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2010-06/msg00165.php

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(a)momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ None of us is going to be here forever. +

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: It's possible to get pg_class oid from GETSTRUC macro?
Next: 9.0beta2 - server crash when using HS + SR