From: eric gisse on
Ken S. Tucker wrote:

> On May 13, 8:29 am, Tom Roberts <tjrob...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> eric gisse wrote:
>> > Simple Simon wrote:
>> >>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/space/7695994/Largest-scientific-
>> > instrument-ever-built-to-prove-Einsteins-theory-of-general-
relativity.html
>>
>> > LISA is not funded yet.
>>
>> Yes. But interestingly, that article implies that LISA Pathfinder is
>> funded and even scheduled to fly. That would be interesting in its own
>> right. Tom Roberts
>
> Just as GP-b failed to detect 'frame dragging'

Stupid liar.

http://einstein.stanford.edu/highlights/status1.html

[snip rest]
From: eric gisse on
Tom Roberts wrote:

> eric gisse wrote:
>> Simple Simon wrote:
>>> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/space/7695994/Largest-scientific-
>> instrument-ever-built-to-prove-Einsteins-theory-of-general-
relativity.html
>>
>> LISA is not funded yet.
>
> Yes. But interestingly, that article implies that LISA Pathfinder is
> funded and even scheduled to fly. That would be interesting in its own
> right.

It is.

http://www.rssd.esa.int/index.php?project=LISAPATHFINDER&page=Mission_Summary

Which is good - can't have the larger scale mission without the technology
testbed flown first.

>
>
> Tom Roberts