From: Cliff on 25 Oct 2007 00:35 On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 19:09:37 GMT, clay <clay(a)mation.com> wrote: >Cliff wrote: >> On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:17:28 GMT, clay <clay(a)mation.com> wrote: >> >>>Cliff wrote: >>>> On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 00:29:05 GMT, clay <clay(a)mation.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>We also have MetalSoft/AP100US and SMP. (looked at ProE's post package >>>>>and had to chuckle... *g*) >>>> >>>> ?? >>>> There may be some confusion ..... >>> >>>No confusion here. What's your problem with my statement? >> >> What are you calling a "post package"? >> IIRC They use (or can) a decent generalized postprocessor >> AND output to the ISO-4343 CLDATA standard so that you >> could use about any "standard" generalized postprocessor your >> heart desires. >> >[x posting removed.] Why? Should be AMC related & even actually on topic. Added back. >Back when we bought a seat of ProE (because MGE UPS insisted all their >vendors have it) we had to sit through a demo of the software. uh, why? >we have to buy it... >PTc showed us this 'punching package' we could add on to our seat of >ProE. Wow, we can view out nests in 3D... woo hoo. >Probably writes ok code but having to deal with ProE menus just to get >there made it somewhat unattractive to us. NOT a post or posting problem then. AND you could probably have automated your specific process, as you can with most CAD/CAM systems. Your complaint seems to be that it was overkill along with a lack of desire to learn. >Funny story. They were bragging on how ProE could take three views of a >2D drawing and automatically make it into a 3D solid. I know, they all >do that, don't they? Not really, in the general case. What are you claiming? It's not even a possible task in all cases. Think about it. >Nobody could come up with a 2D dxf so they exported one out of ProE... >then couldn't get it to import back into the software. Sometimes the demonstrators are new or not well-versed. Don't blame the software. >When they finally got one imported, and spent 20 minutes cleaning it up, >they produced a model. What needed "cleaning"? Perhaps someone was using poor tolerances ... if such applies. >MGE fell flat on their face a few years ago but we kept one seat of ProE >for the few customers that still use it. Perhaps you could use a CAD/CAM system ..... -- Cliff
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: Solidworks 2007 and Vista Next: Solidworks Electrical routing help!!! |