From: Marc Lefebvre Marc on
Hey all,

I was wondering if it is a known bug in PowerPoint when the page size for
the Ledger page layout shows as 13.32in. x 9.99in. when I think it should be
15.99 x 9.99 or something close to that!

The 8.5 x 11 is set to 7.5in x 10in, the 8.5 x 17 is set to 7.5 x 16,
shouldn't the ledger size follow the same pattern of a 1in. border and be 10
x 16?

Any info is appreciated!
From: Steve Rindsberg on
In article <A6CEDF37-B9F7-4E2D-A609-E90E5D66AEBA(a)microsoft.com>, Marc Lefebvre
wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I was wondering if it is a known bug in PowerPoint when the page size for
> the Ledger page layout shows as 13.32in. x 9.99in. when I think it should be
> 15.99 x 9.99 or something close to that!
>
> The 8.5 x 11 is set to 7.5in x 10in, the 8.5 x 17 is set to 7.5 x 16,
> shouldn't the ledger size follow the same pattern of a 1in. border and be 10
> x 16?
>
> Any info is appreciated!

I suspect it's less a bug than a design decision that doesn't make sense if
we're not party to the logic that led to it.

I don't see 8.5x17 as an option, but most of the other page setups (not all)
are a 1.333... aspect ratio. My guess is that it's done this way so you can
change page sizes w/o distorting the graphics on your slides.

Assuming that's what's going on, and allowing for a 1" border on ledger paper,
10 (why 9.99 instead? dunno!) x 13.32 gives a 1.3333... aspect ratio.

That's my theory. For what it's worth.

==============================
PPT Frequently Asked Questions
http://www.pptfaq.com/

PPTools add-ins for PowerPoint
http://www.pptools.com/


From: Joseph M. Newcomer on
See below...
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 14:53:28 -0500, Steve Rindsberg <abuse(a)localhost.com> wrote:

>In article <A6CEDF37-B9F7-4E2D-A609-E90E5D66AEBA(a)microsoft.com>, Marc Lefebvre
>wrote:
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I was wondering if it is a known bug in PowerPoint when the page size for
>> the Ledger page layout shows as 13.32in. x 9.99in. when I think it should be
>> 15.99 x 9.99 or something close to that!
>>
>> The 8.5 x 11 is set to 7.5in x 10in, the 8.5 x 17 is set to 7.5 x 16,
>> shouldn't the ledger size follow the same pattern of a 1in. border and be 10
>> x 16?
>>
>> Any info is appreciated!
>
>I suspect it's less a bug than a design decision that doesn't make sense if
>we're not party to the logic that led to it.
****
This does presume that "logic" was part of the design decision. I'm never sure this
actually comes into play...
****
>
>I don't see 8.5x17 as an option, but most of the other page setups (not all)
>are a 1.333... aspect ratio. My guess is that it's done this way so you can
>change page sizes w/o distorting the graphics on your slides.
>
>Assuming that's what's going on, and allowing for a 1" border on ledger paper,
>10 (why 9.99 instead? dunno!) x 13.32 gives a 1.3333... aspect ratio.
>
>That's my theory. For what it's worth.
****
I always end up resetting it, and it is annoying. I agree; I think it should be a
consistent pattern of borders. If I'm doing something 11x17, it is not intended to be a
visual presentation, it is intended to be part of a poster series or something else for
which PowerPoint is also well-suited.
joe
****
>
>==============================
>PPT Frequently Asked Questions
>http://www.pptfaq.com/
>
>PPTools add-ins for PowerPoint
>http://www.pptools.com/
>
Joseph M. Newcomer [MVP]
email: newcomer(a)flounder.com
Web: http://www.flounder.com
MVP Tips: http://www.flounder.com/mvp_tips.htm
From: Marc Lefebvre on
Is it safe to say that this is actually a Microsoft problem or issue?
Should someone be notified and a fix be worked on?

"Joseph M. Newcomer" wrote:

> See below...
> On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 14:53:28 -0500, Steve Rindsberg <abuse(a)localhost.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <A6CEDF37-B9F7-4E2D-A609-E90E5D66AEBA(a)microsoft.com>, Marc Lefebvre
> >wrote:
> >> Hey all,
> >>
> >> I was wondering if it is a known bug in PowerPoint when the page size for
> >> the Ledger page layout shows as 13.32in. x 9.99in. when I think it should be
> >> 15.99 x 9.99 or something close to that!
> >>
> >> The 8.5 x 11 is set to 7.5in x 10in, the 8.5 x 17 is set to 7.5 x 16,
> >> shouldn't the ledger size follow the same pattern of a 1in. border and be 10
> >> x 16?
> >>
> >> Any info is appreciated!
> >
> >I suspect it's less a bug than a design decision that doesn't make sense if
> >we're not party to the logic that led to it.
> ****
> This does presume that "logic" was part of the design decision. I'm never sure this
> actually comes into play...
> ****
> >
> >I don't see 8.5x17 as an option, but most of the other page setups (not all)
> >are a 1.333... aspect ratio. My guess is that it's done this way so you can
> >change page sizes w/o distorting the graphics on your slides.
> >
> >Assuming that's what's going on, and allowing for a 1" border on ledger paper,
> >10 (why 9.99 instead? dunno!) x 13.32 gives a 1.3333... aspect ratio.
> >
> >That's my theory. For what it's worth.
> ****
> I always end up resetting it, and it is annoying. I agree; I think it should be a
> consistent pattern of borders. If I'm doing something 11x17, it is not intended to be a
> visual presentation, it is intended to be part of a poster series or something else for
> which PowerPoint is also well-suited.
> joe
> ****
> >
> >==============================
> >PPT Frequently Asked Questions
> >http://www.pptfaq.com/
> >
> >PPTools add-ins for PowerPoint
> >http://www.pptools.com/
> >
> Joseph M. Newcomer [MVP]
> email: newcomer(a)flounder.com
> Web: http://www.flounder.com
> MVP Tips: http://www.flounder.com/mvp_tips.htm
> .
>
From: Marc Lefebvre on
Would it be safe to say than that this is actually a Microsoft issue / problem?
Should it be reported and a fix be prepared?

"Joseph M. Newcomer" wrote:

> See below...
> On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 14:53:28 -0500, Steve Rindsberg <abuse(a)localhost.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <A6CEDF37-B9F7-4E2D-A609-E90E5D66AEBA(a)microsoft.com>, Marc Lefebvre
> >wrote:
> >> Hey all,
> >>
> >> I was wondering if it is a known bug in PowerPoint when the page size for
> >> the Ledger page layout shows as 13.32in. x 9.99in. when I think it should be
> >> 15.99 x 9.99 or something close to that!
> >>
> >> The 8.5 x 11 is set to 7.5in x 10in, the 8.5 x 17 is set to 7.5 x 16,
> >> shouldn't the ledger size follow the same pattern of a 1in. border and be 10
> >> x 16?
> >>
> >> Any info is appreciated!
> >
> >I suspect it's less a bug than a design decision that doesn't make sense if
> >we're not party to the logic that led to it.
> ****
> This does presume that "logic" was part of the design decision. I'm never sure this
> actually comes into play...
> ****
> >
> >I don't see 8.5x17 as an option, but most of the other page setups (not all)
> >are a 1.333... aspect ratio. My guess is that it's done this way so you can
> >change page sizes w/o distorting the graphics on your slides.
> >
> >Assuming that's what's going on, and allowing for a 1" border on ledger paper,
> >10 (why 9.99 instead? dunno!) x 13.32 gives a 1.3333... aspect ratio.
> >
> >That's my theory. For what it's worth.
> ****
> I always end up resetting it, and it is annoying. I agree; I think it should be a
> consistent pattern of borders. If I'm doing something 11x17, it is not intended to be a
> visual presentation, it is intended to be part of a poster series or something else for
> which PowerPoint is also well-suited.
> joe
> ****
> >
> >==============================
> >PPT Frequently Asked Questions
> >http://www.pptfaq.com/
> >
> >PPTools add-ins for PowerPoint
> >http://www.pptools.com/
> >
> Joseph M. Newcomer [MVP]
> email: newcomer(a)flounder.com
> Web: http://www.flounder.com
> MVP Tips: http://www.flounder.com/mvp_tips.htm
> .
>