Let's Take A Vote...
in [Design]
|
From: John Devereux on 25 Jul 2010 16:53 Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon(a)On-My-Web-Site.com> writes: > On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 12:25:02 -0700, John Larkin > <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > >>On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 11:02:46 -0700 (PDT), Nunya >><jack_shephard(a)cox.net> wrote: >> >>>On Jul 25, 10:10 am, John Larkin >>><jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >>>> On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 09:55:35 -0700 (PDT), Nunya >>>> >>>> <jack_sheph...(a)cox.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> > Nobody said that coulombs were a measure of force. >>>> >>>> John Fields said precisely that, which was what started this whole >>>> series. >>>> >>>> John >>> >>> They can be a measure of proof that force was applied, and >>>that can be quantified with certain devices, such as capacitors. >>>You lose, again. >> >>Word salad, again. >> >>John > > John "The Bloviator" Larkin obfuscates yet again. Where's the "meat", > John? You can't deliver, so you bloviate. Oh, give it a rest Jim. > Anyone here EVER seen real numbers from John "The Bloviator" Larkin? Of course, many times. He frequently posts circuit measurements for but one example. > > Speak up if you think you have. > > ...Jim Thompson -- John Devereux
From: Jim Thompson on 25 Jul 2010 17:03 On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 21:53:36 +0100, John Devereux <john(a)devereux.me.uk> wrote: >Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon(a)On-My-Web-Site.com> writes: > >> On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 12:25:02 -0700, John Larkin >> <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >> >>>On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 11:02:46 -0700 (PDT), Nunya >>><jack_shephard(a)cox.net> wrote: >>> >>>>On Jul 25, 10:10�am, John Larkin >>>><jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 09:55:35 -0700 (PDT), Nunya >>>>> >>>>> <jack_sheph...(a)cox.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > �Nobody said that coulombs were a measure of force. >>>>> >>>>> John Fields said precisely that, which was what started this whole >>>>> series. >>>>> >>>>> John >>>> >>>> They can be a measure of proof that force was applied, and >>>>that can be quantified with certain devices, such as capacitors. >>>>You lose, again. >>> >>>Word salad, again. >>> >>>John >> >> John "The Bloviator" Larkin obfuscates yet again. Where's the "meat", >> John? You can't deliver, so you bloviate. > >Oh, give it a rest Jim. Larkin can "give it a rest" simply by withdrawing his asinine statement. But he won't... ever. John "The Bloviator" Larkin is totally incapable of admitting error. > >> Anyone here EVER seen real numbers from John "The Bloviator" Larkin? > >Of course, many times. He frequently posts circuit measurements for >but one example. > >> >> Speak up if you think you have. >> >> ...Jim Thompson On components. When has John "The Bloviator" Larkin ever presented a circuit with values AND performance specified? ...Jim Thompson -- | James E.Thompson, CTO | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | | | Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat | | E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 | Spice is like a sports car... Only as good as the person behind the wheel.
From: Phil Hobbs on 25 Jul 2010 18:34 Jim Thompson wrote: > On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 21:53:36 +0100, John Devereux > <john(a)devereux.me.uk> wrote: > >> Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon(a)On-My-Web-Site.com> writes: >> >>> On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 12:25:02 -0700, John Larkin >>> <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 11:02:46 -0700 (PDT), Nunya >>>> <jack_shephard(a)cox.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Jul 25, 10:10 am, John Larkin >>>>> <jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 09:55:35 -0700 (PDT), Nunya >>>>>> >>>>>> <jack_sheph...(a)cox.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Nobody said that coulombs were a measure of force. >>>>>> John Fields said precisely that, which was what started this whole >>>>>> series. >>>>>> >>>>>> John >>>>> They can be a measure of proof that force was applied, and >>>>> that can be quantified with certain devices, such as capacitors. >>>>> You lose, again. >>>> Word salad, again. >>>> >>>> John >>> John "The Bloviator" Larkin obfuscates yet again. Where's the "meat", >>> John? You can't deliver, so you bloviate. >> Oh, give it a rest Jim. > > Larkin can "give it a rest" simply by withdrawing his asinine > statement. But he won't... ever. John "The Bloviator" Larkin is > totally incapable of admitting error. > >>> Anyone here EVER seen real numbers from John "The Bloviator" Larkin? >> Of course, many times. He frequently posts circuit measurements for >> but one example. >> >>> Speak up if you think you have. >>> >>> ...Jim Thompson > > On components. When has John "The Bloviator" Larkin ever presented a > circuit with values AND performance specified? > > ...Jim Thompson Tiresome. Very tiresome. I'd really hate to have to killfile you, Jim, but I'm getting close. Cheers Phil Hobbs -- Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal ElectroOptical Innovations 55 Orchard Rd Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 845-480-2058 hobbs at electrooptical dot net http://electrooptical.net
From: ehsjr on 25 Jul 2010 18:37 m II wrote: > John Fields wrote: > > >>Well, by restating the problem like this: "What two like charges, >>separated in air by a distance of 1km would cause a repulsive force >>between them of 9000 nt?" ,it becomes obvious that charge can be a >>measure of mechanical force since the answer is: "One coulomb each." > > > > > I like my comb. I brush it with a scarf. Then I hold it close to a thin > stream of water coming out of my tap. The water gets deflected in it's > fall by a 20 to 40 degree angle. Pretty good mechanical movement due to > a static charge. Eventually, dissipation rears it's ugly head and the > bent water straightens slowly out. The comb returns to it's drawer, > reminiscing of more useful, follicle filled days. > > > > > > mike :-) Maybe when you charged the comb - to x coulombs, or y volts, or z follicle emptying units - the force pulled the hair to the comb and stuck it there as you used it during the more useful follicle filled days. Ed
From: Jim Thompson on 25 Jul 2010 18:49
On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 18:34:31 -0400, Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless(a)electrooptical.net> wrote: >Jim Thompson wrote: >> On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 21:53:36 +0100, John Devereux >> <john(a)devereux.me.uk> wrote: >> >>> Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon(a)On-My-Web-Site.com> writes: >>> >>>> On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 12:25:02 -0700, John Larkin >>>> <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 11:02:46 -0700 (PDT), Nunya >>>>> <jack_shephard(a)cox.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Jul 25, 10:10 am, John Larkin >>>>>> <jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 09:55:35 -0700 (PDT), Nunya >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <jack_sheph...(a)cox.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nobody said that coulombs were a measure of force. >>>>>>> John Fields said precisely that, which was what started this whole >>>>>>> series. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> John >>>>>> They can be a measure of proof that force was applied, and >>>>>> that can be quantified with certain devices, such as capacitors. >>>>>> You lose, again. >>>>> Word salad, again. >>>>> >>>>> John >>>> John "The Bloviator" Larkin obfuscates yet again. Where's the "meat", >>>> John? You can't deliver, so you bloviate. >>> Oh, give it a rest Jim. >> >> Larkin can "give it a rest" simply by withdrawing his asinine >> statement. But he won't... ever. John "The Bloviator" Larkin is >> totally incapable of admitting error. >> >>>> Anyone here EVER seen real numbers from John "The Bloviator" Larkin? >>> Of course, many times. He frequently posts circuit measurements for >>> but one example. >>> >>>> Speak up if you think you have. >>>> >>>> ...Jim Thompson >> >> On components. When has John "The Bloviator" Larkin ever presented a >> circuit with values AND performance specified? >> >> ...Jim Thompson > >Tiresome. Very tiresome. I'd really hate to have to killfile you, Jim, >but I'm getting close. > >Cheers > >Phil Hobbs Go ahead. Did not John err in his "charge is not conserved" statement? But I guess you're not interested in _factual_ discussions, just BS ones ?? ...Jim Thompson -- | James E.Thompson, CTO | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | | | Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat | | E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 | Spice is like a sports car... Only as good as the person behind the wheel. |