Life's objective ( consumption ? ) is the more interesting question.
in [Physics]
|
Prev: NEWS BULLETIN -- Ed Conrad Has Cancer of the Brain .
Next: Quantum Gravity 362.8: Chaos Reconsidered as Opposite to Memory
From: Painius on 25 Apr 2010 15:11 "HVAC" <mr.hvac(a)gmail.com> wrote in message... news:hr17ov$6lm$1(a)hvac.motzarella.org... > "Painius" <starswirlernosp(a)maol.com> wrote in message > news:4bd3ad35$0$4868$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >>> >>> The above statement that you made was a blatant >>> misreprestation of what Sagan meant by "We are >>> the stuff of stars". >>> >>> Certainly he didn't mean that we are made from the >>> vacuum of space. >> >> That statement merely pointed out the similarity. Sagan >> said we are the stuff of stars. Einstein said that physical >> objects are not "in space" but are instead "spatially >> extended". It was Einstein who believed that we are the >> stuff of space. > > Pathetic. Your style of arguing has now devolved > to prevarication and subterfuge? > > It only points up the weakness of the argument for > the reality of an 'aether'. Why don't you "point up" exactly where i'm prevaricating and guilty of subterfuge. I have no idea what you're on about. happy days and... starry starry nights! -- Indelibly yours, Paine Ellsworth P.S. "We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light." > Plato P.P.S.: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Paine_Ellsworth |