From: George Herold on 11 Aug 2010 19:26 On Aug 11, 7:10 pm, John Larkin <jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 06:10:15 -0700 (PDT), George Herold > > > > > > <ggher...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >On Aug 10, 8:57 pm, John Larkin > ><jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 07:13:20 -0700 (PDT), George Herold > > >> <ggher...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> >On Aug 9, 11:00 pm, John Larkin > >> ><jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > >> >> On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 13:18:18 -0700 (PDT), George Herold > > >> >> <ggher...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >On Aug 8, 4:41 pm, John Larkin > >> >> ><jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 13:14:41 -0700 (PDT), George Herold > > >> >> >> <ggher...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >On Aug 7, 12:12 pm, John Larkin > >> >> >> ><jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Thu, 5 Aug 2010 16:39:25 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill > > >> >> >> >> <BretCah...(a)peoplepc.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >To get to a higher frequency, is it possible to just use a smaller cap > >> >> >> >> >and/or resistor on op amp derivative taking circuits? > > >> >> >> >> What do you mean by "get to a higher frequency"? Do you mean "continue > >> >> >> >> to be accurate at a higher signal frequency"? > > >> >> >> >> The size of the cap scales the constant K in > > >> >> >> >> OUT = K * (dIN/dt) > > >> >> >> >> but has nothing to do with how high a frequency the circuit will work > >> >> >> >> at. The opamp determines that. > > >> >> >> >> The "pure" opamp differentiator, just a cap, a resistor, and an opamp, > >> >> >> >> seldom works. It tends to be unstable and oscillate. > > >> >> >> >> Interestingly, its dual, the opamp integrator, has problems of its > >> >> >> >> own. > > >> >> >> >> Do you have any specific performance goals in mind? > > >> >> >> >> John > > >> >> >> >What problems do you see with an integrator? These always seem to > >> >> >> >work just fine for me. > > >> >> >> They integrate their own voltage offset and bias current, of course. > >> >> >> For something like a magnetic field probe coil, that gets to be the > >> >> >> dominant error. Some cute periodic auto-zero becomes necessary. > >> >> >> Chopper amps are great, but noisy. > > >> >> >> > I find the State Variable filter a bit 'scary'. Whoever first > >> >> >> >thought of putting to integrators in a row had a lot of 'guts'. But I > >> >> >> >love the outcome. > > >> >> >> We're just finishing up a product that jams 32 brutaly-pipelined > >> >> >> 8-pole lowpass filters into one FPGA, sample rate 500 KHz per channel. > >> >> >> The cutoff range is 50 KHz down to 1 Hz, and original concept, classic > >> >> >> DSP butterfly stages, blew up mathematically. At 1 Hz we had allowable > >> >> >> coefficients errors like one part in 10^40, and 2-pole stage gains > >> >> >> like 10^17. This wasn't good. I suggested simulating a state-variable > >> >> >> lowpass digitally, and that worked, using the 48 bit MACs in the > >> >> >> Xilinx FPGA. The nice thing about state-variable filters is that you > >> >> >> can make the 2-pole stage gains exactly 1, and the coefficients scale > >> >> >> pretty much linearly on frequency. > > >> >> >" I like SV analog filters, but sometimes a Sallen-Key is better, > >> >> > because the DC gain is 1 and doesn't depend on resistor accuracy." > > >> >> >I was measuring the DC gain of SV filters we are using a few months > >> >> >ago. I was amazed at how accurate they were. > >> >> >I can't recall the exact numbers, (My notebooks at work and I'm on > >> >> >vacation.) but gain error was much less than the 0.1% resistor > >> >> >tolerance. > >> >> >They all used the same 10k 0.1% Sumuso (sp) resistors, I guess the > >> >> >resistors matched much better than 0.1%. It's hard for me to measure > >> >> >things to much better than 0.1%. I need another digit on my > >> >> >voltmeter. > > >> >> Susumu. They are fabulous, come from Digikey, and cost 1/10 of the > >> >> Vishay stuff. > > >> >> >Say has anyone looked at the resistor values from 0.1% Sumuso (sp) > >> >> >resistors? I wonder if they have the same bimodal > >> >> >distribution that was claimed for the old 10% tolerance carbon > >> >> >resistors. (where the 5% resistors were selected from the middle of > >> >> >the > >> >> >normal distribution.) For those who don't know the better Sumuso > >> >> >resistors also come in 0.05% tolerance. > > >> >> The actual available values are bizarre. Maybe they made what specific > >> >> customers wanted, then put them on the market. Or used a random number > >> >> generator. > > >> >> We tested some of the 0.05% parts, for TC. We got numbers like 5 and 8 > >> >> PPM/K. > > >> >> John > > >> >Ahh Susumu, Thanks for the correction. I wonder if the 0.1% are > >> >rejects from 0.05% batches. (The 0.1% cost something like 1/5 as > >> >much.) Maybe I'll try and measure some.... Say If I put them in a > >> >bridge I can measure differences with a lot more resolution. Is there > >> >any easy way to swap chip resistors into some test jig? I'll need to > >> >keep the variations in the test jig resistance down below 0.1 ohm or > >> >so.. (for 10k ohm samples). > > >> I think the only fair thing to do is solder them to real surface-mount > >> pads on a board, especially to measure TC. You never know how stresses > >> might effect things when you get to single digits of PPMs. > > >> John > > >Hmm If I want a quick measure of say 10 or 20 of them that sounds like > >a lot of work. Unsoldering surface mount is always a bit of a PITA. > >I use solder wick and then push with the iron... > > >Maybe I could stand the R's on end, solder one end to a PCB and touch > >solder a bit of wire to the other end. > > >The Sumusu data sheet does list TC's at the few ppm level. Resistors > >are pretty amazing. What's the TC of a piece of copper?.. one part in > >10^4 or something like that. > > Much worse, around 0.4% per K. Most metals are in that ballpark. > > John Thanks, I knew it was big. I should known, I see a few tenths of an ohm increase in our ~10ohm Helmholtz coils with 3 amps going through them. They get warm maybe 60-70C. George H.
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: Convert Bits/sec to Hz Next: Voltage Reflection Coefficient Question |