From: Todd C on
I currently am running a split database on a LAN. Over time, the directory in
which the backend was stored, has been deleted and re-directed. Is there a
quicker way to re-link the tables in the backend to the frontend rather than
deleting the linked tables in the frontend and just relinking?
--
Todd
From: golfinray on
Google - Jstreetaccessrelinker
--
Milton Purdy
ACCESS
State of Arkansas


"Todd C" wrote:

> I currently am running a split database on a LAN. Over time, the directory in
> which the backend was stored, has been deleted and re-directed. Is there a
> quicker way to re-link the tables in the backend to the frontend rather than
> deleting the linked tables in the frontend and just relinking?
> --
> Todd
From: Jerry Whittle on
If it's just a matter that the mapped drive letter has changes, like P to Q,
you can use UNCs to link the tables. Here's some discussion on the matter:

http://www.accessmonster.com/Uwe/Forum.aspx/access/14837/Linked-Table-Manager-UNC-Paths
--
Jerry Whittle, Microsoft Access MVP
Light. Strong. Cheap. Pick two. Keith Bontrager - Bicycle Builder.


"Todd C" wrote:

> I currently am running a split database on a LAN. Over time, the directory in
> which the backend was stored, has been deleted and re-directed. Is there a
> quicker way to re-link the tables in the backend to the frontend rather than
> deleting the linked tables in the frontend and just relinking?
> --
> Todd
From: david on
Quicker? How long does it take?
If it takes very long, how are you doing it?

(david)

"Todd C" <ToddC(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:5F1AAAE5-C884-4FCC-B08E-BD27DF7D3F90(a)microsoft.com...
>I currently am running a split database on a LAN. Over time, the directory
>in
> which the backend was stored, has been deleted and re-directed. Is there a
> quicker way to re-link the tables in the backend to the frontend rather
> than
> deleting the linked tables in the frontend and just relinking?
> --
> Todd