Prev: Dell PowerEdge 4200 scsi, worked in 2.6.18, not in 2.6.26 (LOW PRIORITY help request)
Next: param sysfs oops (simple, leaky) fix, bool arrays fix
From: Jiahua on 22 Jun 2010 12:30
Maybe a native question, but why need 50 targets? Each target can only
serve about 25K IOPS? A single ramdisk should be able to handle this.
Where is the bottleneck?

We had a similar experiment but with Infiniband and Lustre. It turn
out Lustre has a rate limit in the RPC handling layer. Is it the same
problem here?

Jiahua



On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Pasi K�rkk�inen <pasik(a)iki.fi> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Recently Intel and Microsoft demonstrated pushing over 1.25 million IOPS using software iSCSI and a single 10 Gbit NIC:
> http://communities.intel.com/community/wired/blog/2010/04/22/1-million-iops-how-about-125-million
>
> Earlier they achieved one (1.0) million IOPS:
> http://blog.fosketts.net/2010/01/14/microsoft-intel-push-million-iscsi-iops/
> http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/server/blog/2010/01/19/1000000-iops-with-iscsi--thats-not-a-typo
>
> The benchmark setup explained:
> http://communities.intel.com/community/wired/blog/2010/04/20/1-million-iop-article-explained
> http://dlbmodigital.microsoft.com/ppt/TN-100114-JSchwartz_SMorgan_JPlawner-1032432956-FINAL.pdf
>
>
> So the question is.. does someone have enough new hardware to try this with Linux?
> Can Linux scale to over 1 million IO operations per second?
>
>
> Intel and Microsoft used the following for the benchmark:
>
> � � � �- Single Windows 2008 R2 system with Intel Xeon 5600 series CPU,
> � � � � �single-port Intel 82599 10 Gbit NIC and MS software-iSCSI initiator
> � � � � �connecting to 50x iSCSI LUNs.
> � � � �- IOmeter to benchmark all the 50x iSCSI LUNs concurrently.
>
> � � � �- 10 servers as iSCSI targets, each having 5x ramdisk LUNs, total of 50x ramdisk LUNs.
> � � � �- iSCSI target server also used 10 Gbit NICs, and StarWind iSCSI target software.
> � � � �- Cisco 10 Gbit switch (Nexus) connecting the servers.
>
> � � � �- For the 1.25 million IOPS result they used 512 bytes/IO benchmark, outstanding IOs=20.
> � � � �- No jumbo frames, just the standard MTU=1500.
>
> They used many LUNs so they can scale the iSCSI connections to multiple CPU cores
> using RSS (Receive Side Scaling) and MSI-X interrupts.
>
> So.. Who wants to try this? :) I don't unfortunately have 11x extra computers with 10 Gbit NICs atm to try it myself..
>
> This test covers networking, block layer, and software iSCSI initiator..
> so it would be a nice to see if we find any bottlenecks from current Linux kernel.
>
> Comments please!
>
> -- Pasi
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at �http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at �http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Dell PowerEdge 4200 scsi, worked in 2.6.18, not in 2.6.26 (LOW PRIORITY help request)
Next: param sysfs oops (simple, leaky) fix, bool arrays fix