Linux Server Share Shrinking
in [Freeware]
|
From: »Q« on 29 Jun 2010 20:15 In <news:i0dm2o$r7r$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, Nemesis <somewhere(a)home.br> wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:07:24 +0100, Martin Jay wrote: > > > On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 18:55:34 -0700, Mike Easter <MikeE(a)ster.invalid> > > wrote: > > > >>http://news.netcraft.com/ > >> > >>Apache 54.02% > >>Microsoft 26.03% > >>Google 7.43% > >> > >>There is also a graph there showing 1995-2010 and you can clearly > >>see the interval from 2007 to the present with MS (red line) > >>trending downward from about 38% to 26% while linux/Apache (blue > >>line on top) has increased over the same frame. > > > > Are Linux and Apache the same thing? > No, but Apache is built for Linux and the windows version is > a kick-off from that. Nobody in their right mind would set up Apache > on a Window$ servers, if the free Linux version is more stable. > Except Balmer and Bare Bottoms, I suppose. > []'s > > PS You dont even need a gui for Apache. Or PHP or Mysql ... Apache's first target was UNIX, not specifically GNU/Linux. I'm sure you and others are right when you say not many people are running Apache servers on Windows, but neither is it measure of GNU/Linux share. Bottoms does use Apache; I dunno about Ballmer.
From: Aaron on 11 Jul 2010 14:08
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/29/2010 04:33 PM, Mike Easter wrote: > Cousin Stanley wrote: >>> Mike Easter > >>>> http://news.netcraft.com/ >>>> >>>> Apache 54.02% >>>> Microsoft 26.03% >>>> Google 7.43% > >>> Are Linux and Apache the same thing? > > Netcraft sez they have the ability to determine the OS as well as the > webserver software when they are surveying a site -- but I don't know > where they keep such data for OS instead of what was presented. > > The main page link I posted has the June survey graphs and data the way > they present it. I assumed that the vast majority of apache webservers > were running on linux, not MS or OS/2 or Mac OSes - all of which apache > has versions or ports. > > > What about {Net,Free,Open}BSD? BSD has been in the game a long time. I'm not sure on their numbers (I'm not sure anyone is, for that matter), but I'd say it's more reasonable to consider how many Apache servers might be running on them than on OS/2. I don't think anyone that's happy about the successes of Linux is going to get too depressed because some of that success actually belongs to BSD. I know they can get religious, but they're basically on the same team. Adjusting in the other direction, doesn't Google run Linux on pretty much everything? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJMOgiRAAoJEFoOBH1d5rLSt+wQAJGUjodvZS7IhRSscmz2sEdi mR1p0Z0fIBR7rWvc2J2tiUuG7cCZw1uf1NY/hySho2OKpcSeU1r27U+0a1yN86Sv J3wQ4yZXYhrfrBlU+vOxUZdY4kJjLvlpgHTcl3VFBAxK/W7TEOk4HSloDNF4YzE1 KNm4hTt0L8n7KK3rOHkkCGhijf9k3tecYGGJEjADcpyqWrYVRozfJuoyGLQg6HxT qg9IaoanU+bz7ZtHhVuvNaJi7q2XqfeQ0RP3LFZpg0Tl4ZFT4OTaWcGHe2iC7KNK xgMmwLg8yYUZOqcEUId6jzAUHIPdBfK8n4yg92em8jpL9CpxtFUX6Uy/G0aMv4c+ 82BJ4cAhJ9HqQZkodOZDJfUP/+tBKVWUV5k1l44er0HbJbq3tluzri5mgaW/Kq6E +qq2+ZOaIVoBdHo5Jq8dnzGNOEj4CS2upvRphSbR+qG1CmNNgj/NBy7bt/SZO28V LdJcu6lhlgpNot+FpZKtRAe+MRE9vJo8o2yuN+usX7mbxBSddJ7IEbXbCI3kgkGe /dn11YSgq+o0eZ7684aDgkT6QfD7YTXzDl8DaBwMGOS5HxWPXuBcHM4aev7Z75rB YFkna5LC/kNbw0koW0xlSXyaNlm/CJXvWyiGMT8KAblX6HJOwSLOcKjGhoq2qWcK WKXmDcprfskMEGO6VHux =i29p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |