Linux friendly Laptops and Netbooks??
in [Linux Networking]
|
Prev: Very strange, multiple IP addresses on the same Ethernet carddo not route properly
Next: Error with gen_initramfs_list.sh when creating initramfs_data.cpio.gz
From: notbob on 12 Jan 2010 11:03 On 2010-01-12, The Natural Philosopher <tnp(a)invalid.invalid> wrote: > Michael Black wrote: >> Linux won't work with some hardware, because..... > This is the key point. It might be if Asus didn't offer this very same netbook with Linux. http://event.asus.com/eeepc/comparison/eeepc_comparison.htm Slackware also offers an official 64bit version, now. I've heard of no hardware complaints. nb
From: The Natural Philosopher on 12 Jan 2010 11:32 notbob wrote: > On 2010-01-12, The Natural Philosopher <tnp(a)invalid.invalid> wrote: >> Michael Black wrote: > >>> Linux won't work with some hardware, because..... > > >> This is the key point. > > It might be if Asus didn't offer this very same netbook with Linux. > > http://event.asus.com/eeepc/comparison/eeepc_comparison.htm that doesn't mean there are not non free drivers involved. My comments were not about any particular piece of hardware anwyay, so your comment is irrelevant as a response to my post. > > Slackware also offers an official 64bit version, now. I've heard > of no hardware complaints. > > Like I said. 99% of the time linux works flawlessly. The 1% of the time is where you get the frustrated peple smashing the internet bandwidth with howls of despair ;-) I was trying to convey some flavour of where problems might be expected, generically, and how to forestall them. Not give an unqualified endorsement or censure to any particular bit of hardware., or distro. > nb >
From: Darren Salt on 12 Jan 2010 14:27 I demand that The Natural Philosopher may or may not have written... [snip] > I will add one further issue. My wide writes websites. On a Mac. she came > up with an issue with Firefox 3.5, which is not available under Debian at > all http://packages.debian.org/iceweasel says otherwise. > the Iceweasel port is a port of firefox 2.X at current stable levels. Again, http://packages.debian.org/iceweasel says otherwise. [snip] -- | Darren Salt | linux at youmustbejoking | nr. Ashington, | Doon | using Debian GNU/Linux | or ds ,demon,co,uk | Northumberland | Army | + http://www.youmustbejoking.demon.co.uk/ & http://tartarus.org/ds/ Charm is a way of getting a "yes" without having asked any clear question.
From: The Natural Philosopher on 12 Jan 2010 15:25 Darren Salt wrote: > I demand that The Natural Philosopher may or may not have written... > > [snip] >> I will add one further issue. My wide writes websites. On a Mac. she came >> up with an issue with Firefox 3.5, which is not available under Debian at >> all > > http://packages.debian.org/iceweasel says otherwise. > >> the Iceweasel port is a port of firefox 2.X at current stable levels. > > Again, http://packages.debian.org/iceweasel says otherwise. > > [snip] Only in unstable lenny (stable) (web): lightweight web browser based on Mozilla 3.0.6-3 [security]: alpha amd64 arm armel hppa i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc is as good as it gets these days. In stable. You have to go unstable to get 3.5. I wasn't prepared to do that, and it wasn't available at all when I need it about 9 months ago.
From: Darren Salt on 12 Jan 2010 18:25
I demand that The Natural Philosopher may or may not have written... [snip] > lenny (stable) (web): lightweight web browser based on Mozilla 3.0.6-3 > [security]: alpha amd64 arm armel hppa i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 > sparc > is as good as it gets these days. In stable. > You have to go unstable to get 3.5. Not when it's also in testing... [snip] -- | Darren Salt | linux at youmustbejoking | nr. Ashington, | Doon | using Debian GNU/Linux | or ds ,demon,co,uk | Northumberland | Army | + Vermin Media. Not "nothing to hide" but "you're invading my privacy". The gent who wakes up and finds himself a success hasn't been asleep. |