From: Russell King on
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 08:16:28PM +1100, Simon Horman wrote:
> To add to this, my understanding is that kexec support varies across
> different ARM platforms - that is to say, it works on some and fails on
> others. While this seems to be slowly improving, I'm also aware of any list
> of what is supported and what isn't.

I'm unaware of that; the only area of weakness with kexec that I'm
aware of is when the ARMv7 processor support didn't implement the
necessary code to bring the caches/mmu/tlbs into a safe state for
software-reboot, which is also what's required by kexec.

--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Simon Horman on
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 07:00:47PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 08:16:28PM +1100, Simon Horman wrote:
> > To add to this, my understanding is that kexec support varies across
> > different ARM platforms - that is to say, it works on some and fails on
> > others. While this seems to be slowly improving, I'm also aware of any list
> > of what is supported and what isn't.
>
> I'm unaware of that; the only area of weakness with kexec that I'm
> aware of is when the ARMv7 processor support didn't implement the
> necessary code to bring the caches/mmu/tlbs into a safe state for
> software-reboot, which is also what's required by kexec.

Ok, I could well be mistaken and its just ARMv7 that has a few issues
at this time.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/