From: Tamas K Papp on 25 Jan 2010 09:31 On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:12:30 -0500, Raffael Cavallaro wrote: > On 2010-01-25 01:37:53 -0500, Rahul Jain said: > >> Which commercial lisp comes with all the random open source lisp >> libraries pre-bundled, tested, and kept reasonably up-to-date? > > The OP wasn't talking about "all the random open source lisp libraries > ." He was talking about getting incompatible versions of slime and > swank, two components essential for basic editor/compiler/interpreter > interaction with most open source common lisps. These two components are This happened to me only once, when I mixed stuff from Debian with development versions from the repositories (quite a stupid thing). I had been using Lisp for about 2 months back then (still pretty green behind the ears), and I just realized that I should install the latest of everything, and voila, it worked. After that, I started using clbuild, and never had troubles like this. YMMV, but I would guess that getting slime to work is not the part which is typically problematic. I found the management of other libraries a comparatively larger PITA. AFAIK commercial lisps don't offer an advantage there. > an IDE) is that before one can do the most basic things one has to > negotiate the potential migrane headache of configuring emacs and slime. I consider "migrane headache" a bit of an overstatement. clbuild will get you the latest SLIME, and emit an Emacs snippet upon request (clbuild slime-configuration) which you just have to paste into your Emacs config file. The whole process takes a few minutes. Please don't misunderstand me, I am not saying that some commercial lisps don't offer a smoother experience installation experience---they might, especially for newbies. But the free alternative is not super-difficult to install either. Tamas
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: clisp on emacs+slime Next: How to turn on multithreading capability in CLISP? |