Listen up, physics cripples
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Hyundai Service Delhi | Hyundai Showroom Gurgaon
Next: Who is really the 'personality' that calls himself 'Inertial' ??!!
From: Brian Davis on 6 Jun 2010 14:45 On Jun 5, 12:11 pm, Uncle Al <Uncle...(a)hate.spam.net> wrote: > http://snarxiv.org/vs-arxiv/http://snarxiv.org/vs-arxiv/highscores/ > > Choose between a published physics paper title and technobabble. Make > the binary choice, enjoy your running reality score. You know, having tried this (8/10 80%, with some wonderful options like "Relativity" as a title... yes, that one was false, ironic since I have a real paper with that title as well, making the whole game... humorously pointless)... I wonder how well any other field would do. Imagine novel titles, or psychology papers, or desert recipes. The fact that a reasonably smart text generator can produce apparently meaningful strings... really shows just about nothing. After all, I can speak in numerous languages without understanding what I'm saying... which hadly negates the fact that there really *are* folks who speak french, german, sanskrit, etc. -- Brian Davis
From: Uncle Al on 6 Jun 2010 15:02 blackhead wrote: > > On 5 June, 17:11, Uncle Al <Uncle...(a)hate.spam.net> wrote: > > http://snarxiv.org/vs-arxiv/ > > http://snarxiv.org/vs-arxiv/highscores/ > > > > Choose between a published physics paper title and technobabble. Make > > the binary choice, enjoy your running reality score. > 38% to start - rejected title if it looked too long winded. > 62% - inverted above strategy. "8^>) Adds to 100%, too! -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm
From: Uncle Al on 6 Jun 2010 15:14
blackhead wrote: > > On 5 June, 17:11, Uncle Al <Uncle...(a)hate.spam.net> wrote: > > http://snarxiv.org/vs-arxiv/ > > http://snarxiv.org/vs-arxiv/highscores/ > > > > Choose between a published physics paper title and technobabble. Make > > the binary choice, enjoy your running reality score. > 38% to start - rejected title if it looked too long winded. > 62% - inverted above strategy. "8^>) Adds to 100%, too! -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm |