From: Ross Herbert on
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 21:14:27 -0800, life imitates life
<pasticcio(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:

:On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:18:49 -0600, "Tim Williams"
:<tmoranwms(a)charter.net> wrote:
:
:>I actually have some copper rope, which is about 1/4" diameter and looks to
:>be made of 28AWG or so. I don't remember how many strands it is, but if I
:>guess the rope is wound from 7 strands of 31 strand twist, that's 7*31 =
:>217.
:
:
: The problem is that it not being constructed from individual mag wires,
:it is "seen" as a single strand to the current flow, and having only ONE
:skin. The litz configuration requires the wire be discreet from each
:other with the exception of the termination points.


I hope you don't mind a little bit of layman's interpretation as an assistance
to the OP but what you mean by "mag wire" is that each individual strand which
makes up the total x-sectional area of the litz conductor MUST be insulated from
every other strand. If the strands aren't insulated then the skin effect will be
the same as if a single strand of the same overall x-sectional area had been
used - and this is no good for high frequencies.
From: life imitates life on
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 10:24:28 GMT, Ross Herbert <rherber1(a)bigpond.net.au>
wrote:

>On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 21:14:27 -0800, life imitates life
><pasticcio(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
>
>:On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:18:49 -0600, "Tim Williams"
>:<tmoranwms(a)charter.net> wrote:
>:
>:>I actually have some copper rope, which is about 1/4" diameter and looks to
>:>be made of 28AWG or so. I don't remember how many strands it is, but if I
>:>guess the rope is wound from 7 strands of 31 strand twist, that's 7*31 =
>:>217.
>:
>:
>: The problem is that it not being constructed from individual mag wires,
>:it is "seen" as a single strand to the current flow, and having only ONE
>:skin. The litz configuration requires the wire be discreet from each
>:other with the exception of the termination points.
>
>
>I hope you don't mind a little bit of layman's interpretation as an assistance
>to the OP but what you mean by "mag wire" is that each individual strand which
>makes up the total x-sectional area of the litz conductor MUST be insulated from
>every other strand. If the strands aren't insulated then the skin effect will be
>the same as if a single strand of the same overall x-sectional area had been
>used - and this is no good for high frequencies.


Exactly. I do not word things well on the fly. I do far better as a
proofreader of other's works or even my own work, upon subsequent
re-examination
From: amdx on

"life imitates life" <pasticcio(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in
message news:sauun5t4ct7i1ule9dj0lsihmjv5u5ecvs(a)4ax.com...
> On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:57:41 -0800, John Larkin
> <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:21:36 -0600, "Tim Williams"
>><tmoranwms(a)charter.net> wrote:
>>
>>>Who sells this stuff (without paying for miles at a time)?
>>>
>>>I'm especially interested in stupid thick stuff, like, as large as 8AWG
>>>equivalent. Nebraska Surplus for instance doesn't stock wire like this.
>>>
>>>Tim


> Trial and error with gauges and strand count do
> more to optimize the result than ANY specialized, presumed to be required
> braiding or weaving. The segregation is the key to increasing surface
> area within a given cumulative "gauge".

No need to do trial and error, Here's a table that gives recommended gauge
with regard to frequency.
See Table B.
http://www.litz-wire.com/technical.html
Same thing in pdf.
http://www.litz-wire.com/New%20PDFs/Frequency_Chart_3.01.13.09.pdf

Regarding "ANY specialized, presumed to be required braiding or weaving":
This is used to equalize proximity effects which equalizes currents in the
individual wires.

Quote from; http://www.dartmouth.edu/~sullivan/litzwire/skin.html
"The objective of twisting or weaving litz wire, as opposed to just grouping
fine conductors together, is to ensure that the strand currents are equal.
Simple twisted bunched-conductor wire can accomplish this adequately in
situations where proximity effect would be the only significant problem with
solid wire. Where skin effect would also be a problem, more complex litz
constructions can be used to ensure equal strand currents. Thus, in a
well-designed construction, strand currents are very close to equal."

There is a great deal of information available about the use of litz wire,
if you have the math ability
you can become an expert in a couple of days!
Mike



From: dcaster on
On Feb 20, 5:47 am, life imitates life
<pastic...(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:58:13 -0600, Tim Wescott <t...(a)seemywebsite.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:18:49 -0600, Tim Williams wrote:
>
> >> "George Herold" <ggher...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> >>news:550831a9-5935-4e3d-b37e-c664ebd9d752(a)o3g2000yqb.googlegroups.com....
> >>> We get Litz wire from MWS but nothing that big.  If you don't need that
> >>> much have you thought of 'rolling your own'?
>
> >> I do sometimes, but only for small things.  I'm contemplating 10A at
> >> 1MHz, so it needs to be pretty fine = way more strands than I'd want to
> >> deal with.
>
> >> I actually have some copper rope, which is about 1/4" diameter and looks
> >> to be made of 28AWG or so.  I don't remember how many strands it is, but
> >> if I guess the rope is wound from 7 strands of 31 strand twist, that's
> >> 7*31 = 217.  If 28AWG is good for ~200mA, 217 strands should be good for
> >> 40A, which sounds about right, I'd call it 8 or 10AWG equivalent.  I
> >> salvaged this stuff from some old motor driver, which used a spool of
> >> this stuff for air-core inductors.
>
> >> Tim
>
> >Isn't there some magic braiding pattern for Litz wire?
>
>   No.  The wire strands have to be mag wire, which segregates them from
> each other, allowing the skin effect to be taken advantage of.  Without
> strand segregation, it becomes a single strand, from the POV of the
> current flowing in it, with only one skin for the entire mass.

No again. The wire strands have to be segregated and also braided so
that some of the time a strand is on the outside of the bundle and
sometimes on the inside of the bundle. See attached from Wiki.

Litz wire uses some different tricks. Instead of using one big
conductor, it uses lots of little conductors (strands) in parallel
(forming a bundle). Each little conductor is less than a skin-depth,
so an individual strand does not suffer an appreciable skin effect
loss. However, that is not the complete story. The strands must be
insulated from each other -- otherwise all the wires in the bundle
would short together, look like a single large wire, and still have
skin effect problems. Furthermore, the strands cannot occupy the same
radial position in the bundle: the electromagnetic effects that cause
the skin effect would still disrupt conduction. The bundle is
constructed so the individual strands are on the outside of the bundle
(and see low resistance) for a time, but also reside in the interior
of the bundle (where the EM field changes are the strongest and the
resistance is higher). If each strand sees about the same average
resistance, then each strand will contribute equally to the conduction
of the entire cable.


Dan
From: legg on
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:18:49 -0600, "Tim Williams"
<tmoranwms(a)charter.net> wrote:

>"George Herold" <ggherold(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:550831a9-5935-4e3d-b37e-c664ebd9d752(a)o3g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>> We get Litz wire from MWS but nothing that big. If you don't need
>> that much have you thought of 'rolling your own'?
>
>I do sometimes, but only for small things. I'm contemplating 10A at 1MHz,
>so it needs to be pretty fine = way more strands than I'd want to deal with.
>
>I actually have some copper rope, which is about 1/4" diameter and looks to
>be made of 28AWG or so. I don't remember how many strands it is, but if I
>guess the rope is wound from 7 strands of 31 strand twist, that's 7*31 =
>217. If 28AWG is good for ~200mA, 217 strands should be good for 40A, which
>sounds about right, I'd call it 8 or 10AWG equivalent. I salvaged this
>stuff from some old motor driver, which used a spool of this stuff for
>air-core inductors.


It might serve if you can decouple the strands.

Shake it loose and bake it to form an ~oxide layer on the individual
strands. Doesn't have to be an insulator as such, just a poor
conductor to adjacent wires.

The actual aim of the 'twist' is to have strands in any particular
bundle or strand at near-right angles to those on the opposing
surface, as the twist pattern is scaled up.

If the twist direction is reversed on each level of build-up, surface
strands will always appear to be pointed in the approximate direction
of current flow, and the structure itself will not 'bind'.

RL