From: Jorge on 30 Jan 2010 09:11 On Jan 30, 11:01 am, "Richard Maher" <maher...(a)hotspamnotmail.com> wrote: > > var eventsMgr = function() > { > var AST = 0; > > var setAST = > function(entryPoint,timer){ > AST = setTimeout(entryPoint,timer); > empsCnt.value = AST; ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Sure ? > }; > > var cancelAST = > function(){ > fadeSecs.value = AST; ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Why ? > clearTimeout(AST); > }; > > return { > setAST : setAST, > cancelAST : cancelAST > }; > }(); > -- Jorge.
From: Lew on 30 Jan 2010 11:56 Richard Maher wrote: > Fair enough, but as they say in the movies "it's complicated"! Please see > below for randomator.html (<500 lines). This is a next to useless random > employee picker that is designed just to work my Applet's socket while a > more useful employee lookup page/tab is handling user requests. .... > Randomator uses an Applet to connect back to the codebase via a TCP/IP > socket. Could you show the applet code? Those of us reading from clj.programmer are probably in a much better position to discuss Java issues than Javascript issues. > This Socket, along with much other stuff, is held in static variable that is > common among all like-minded applets accross any number of tabs in a browser > instance. There an awful lot of risks to static variables, mainly with respect to concurrency collisions. .... > 3) Because the Async flag on the SEND was set to false the Applet instance > will now wait in JAVA [sic] for the reader thread (well, actually, the Javascript > this.rendezvous() function) to tell it to proceed. Seeing the Java code will really help us here in clj.programmer. > *4) Upon receiving the server response the Reader thread calls > myJSObject.call("dispatcher", args) > 5) The "dispatcher" tries to call your callback "positionDiv" which works > many times before failing All this back-and-forth between Java and Javascript seems complicated. Well, you did say that, but I imagine there must be a more straightforward way to deal with it. > ... > Should I make positionDiv() static and pass it the EmpPicker instance or > Index as an argument? (Is "this" causing problems?) Redux on warning about static variables. > PS. I'm really not in the mood for the regular self-appointed newsgroup > sheriffs or incurable wankers Pot, meet kettle. Kettle, meet pot. > spelling, cross-posting, overall strategy or design philosophy. Please find > someone else to annoy for today! Right back atcha. -- Lew
From: Jorge on 30 Jan 2010 12:11 On Jan 30, 11:01 am, "Richard Maher" <maher...(a)hotspamnotmail.com> wrote: (...) Removing the applet and the back-and-forth between Java-JS the resulting java-less version seems to run fine: http://jorgechamorro.com/cljs/095/ <script type="text/javascript"> function Tier3Client () { (this.chan= {}).rendezvous= function () { console.log("this.chan.rendezvous(), "+ (+new Date())); }; this.chan.send= function (msgCandidate, msgBody, async) { var r= "31abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz"; if (async) { setTimeout(function () { console.log("this.chan.send(async===true)"); msgCandidate.dispatcher(r, 0, 0); }, (2e3*Math.random())|0); } else { console.log("this.chan.send(async===false)"); msgCandidate.dispatcher(r, 0, 0); } }; this.chan.appendConsoleMsg= function (p) { console.log("appendConsoleMsg: "+ p); }; } (Tier3Client.prototype = {}).send= function (msgBody, callback, async) { var chan = this.chan; var callbackArgs = []; var i = 0; var msgCandidate = { dispatcher : function (responseMsg, msgSlotId, msgSeqNum) { callbackArgs[0] = responseMsg; callback.apply(this, callbackArgs); }, rendezvous : function () { console.log("msgCandidate.rendezvous(), "+ (+new Date())); return chan.rendezvous(); } }; for (i=3; i<arguments.length; i++) { callbackArgs[i - 2] = arguments[i]; } return chan.send(msgCandidate, msgBody, async); }; Tier3Client.prototype.appendConsoleMsg= function (msg) { console.log("Tier3Client.prototype.appendConsoleMsg(), "+ (+new Date())); this.chan.appendConsoleMsg(msg); }; </script> -- Jorge.
From: "Michael Haufe ("TNO")" on 30 Jan 2010 13:42 On Jan 30, 7:24 am, Jorge <jo...(a)jorgechamorro.com> wrote: > Nor a <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; > charset=ISO-8859-1"> The interwebs demand utf-8!
From: Jorge on 30 Jan 2010 14:21 On Jan 30, 7:42 pm, "Michael Haufe (\"TNO\")" <t...(a)thenewobjective.com> wrote: > On Jan 30, 7:24 am, Jorge <jo...(a)jorgechamorro.com> wrote: > > > Nor a <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; > > charset=ISO-8859-1"> > > The interwebs demand utf-8! Yes, but there's this in his code: t3Client = new Tier3Client( "Demo", "http://192.168.1.159/Applets/", 2048, 1022, "ISO-8859-1", "N", Tier3Client.GUIAWT, null, Tier3Client.WARNING); -- Jorge.
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: Help resolving NoSuchMethodError Next: Display image on form... |