Logic

HERE is a list that contains ALL possible infinite sequences of digits
As the length of the list of computable reals->oo, the length of all possible digit sequences on the list->oo. What's your explanation for what happens if the list IS infinitely long? All sequences doesn't quite make it to infinity?? It misses some? Herc -- "George Greene" <greeneg(a)email.unc.edu> wrote ... 6 Jul 2010 15:35

since Physics has no numbers beyond 10^500, then that should be infinity for mathematics #621 Correcting Math
Transfer Principle <lwalke3(a)lausd.net> writes: Say, LWalk, can you help me out on public relations? I have used the term "old-math" but such a moniker has been used throughout history. So I need a new moniker. Should I call it the "ill-defined math", or how about "sloth-math" since the community knows... 2 Jul 2010 09:05

R.E sets, Three valued logic and diagonal argument.
If we take a non total Turing machine and run it over all possible inputs on its alphabet, (in a time sharing manner, so that it runs on input 1 for 1 minute, on input1 for 1 minute and on input 2 for 2 minutes and so on) then , at any given time, we have 3 catalogs: 1) Inputs that have been accepted 2) Inputs th... 10 Jul 2010 01:59

New maths formula, maths 2&3^(a->38^7839_88)-34 MATHS 3+4=4 sin(x)=oo
I'm just stirring Dingo... and testing my new George Greene sig. Herc -- "George Greene" <greeneg(a)email.unc.edu> wrote Are you really that stupid to assume ...? I don't NEED to ASSUME! ... 2 Jul 2010 06:54

How Can ZFC/PA do much of Math - it Can't Even ProvePAisConsistent (EASY PROOF)
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:26:43 -0400, herbzet <herbzet(a)gmail.com> said: ... I thought that the proof of consistency of PA relative to ZFC by showing that there is a model of PA in ZFC was a metatheorem, not a theorem stated in ZFC and proved using the axioms of ZFC. You can... 3 Jul 2010 02:38

since Physics has no numbers beyond 10^500, then that should be infinity for mathematics #622 Correcting Math
Transfer Principle wrote: On Jul 1, 10:50 pm, Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archime...(a)gmail.com> wrote: Transfer Principle wrote: Actually, I take that back. I suppose that one could include 10^500 by stating, "if no odd perfect number less than 10^500 exists, then no odd perfect ... 2 Jul 2010 04:46

since Physics has no numbers beyond 10^500, then that should be infinity for mathematics #621 Correcting Math
Transfer Principle wrote: On Jul 1, 12:56 pm, Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archime...(a)gmail.com> wrote: Theorem: In old-math, geometry had well-defined finite-line versus infinite-line but Algebra or Number theory was ill-defined with its finite-number versus infinite-number and that is why ... 3 Jul 2010 11:16

As the length of the list of computable reals->oo, the length of all possible digit sequences on the list->oo.
As the length of the list of computable reals->oo, the length of all possible digit sequences on the list->oo. What's your explanation for what happens if the list IS infinitely long? All sequences doesn't quite make it to infinity?? It misses some? Herc -- Conan do we REALLY have to hear the lamentations ... 6 Jul 2010 16:42

Geometry is clean with finite-line vs. infinite-line but Algebra is defective with finite-number vs infinite number #620 Correcting Math
Theorem: In old-math, geometry had well-defined finite-line versus infinite-line but Algebra or Number theory was ill-defined with its finite-number versus infinite-number and that is why mathematics could never prove Twin Primes, Perfect Numbers, Goldbach C. , Fermat's Last Theorem, Riemann Hypothesis and thousa... 2 Jul 2010 10:11

Wouldn’t It be Cool if These WereEquivalent?
Aatu Koskensilta wrote: I'm too tired to write anything sensible about this, but web.mit.edu/arayo/www/Introduction.pdf makes for an interesting read, for those who find these sort of things interesting. Those who don't might not find it the least bit interesting. (The collection _Absolute ... 1 Jul 2010 11:06