From: Tom Lane on 29 Jun 2010 10:40 Thom Brown <thombrown(a)gmail.com> writes: > Are there any plans to support look-behind and negative look-behind > for regular expressions in future? No. Or are you volunteering? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Thom Brown on 29 Jun 2010 10:44 On 29 June 2010 15:40, Tom Lane <tgl(a)sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Thom Brown <thombrown(a)gmail.com> writes: >> Are there any plans to support look-behind and negative look-behind >> for regular expressions in future? > > No. �Or are you volunteering? > A n00b like me volunteer for that? It's more of a suggestion. Thom -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: "David E. Wheeler" on 29 Jun 2010 12:49 On Jun 29, 2010, at 7:44 AM, Thom Brown wrote: >> No. Or are you volunteering? > > A n00b like me volunteer for that? It's more of a suggestion. N00bs gotta start somewhere� Best, David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
|
Pages: 1 Prev: [HACKERS] Look-behind regular expressions Next: Check constraints on non-immutable keys |