From: JW on 9 Jun 2010 09:50 On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 06:56:27 -0700 Winston <Winston(a)bigbrother.net> wrote in Message id: <hub0l8015eg(a)news7.newsguy.com>: >On 6/4/2010 3:34 AM, JW wrote: >> On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 06:57:56 -0700 Winston<Winston(a)bigbrother.net> wrote >> in Message id:<hu8cd401obc(a)news3.newsguy.com>: > >(...) > >>> I really like the Tek TDS series. Clearly the user interface was >>> designed by an actual scope user rather than just a software >>> (Cough Agilent cough) engineer. >> >> Which Agilent scopes are you referring to? I like the 548XX Infiniium >> series... > >Can't recall the model number. It was a fancy 4 - channel color DSO. >Looked very similar to: >http://www.home.agilent.com/agilent/redirector.jspx?action=ref&cname=AGILENT_EDITORIAL&ckey=126226&lc=eng&cc=US&nfr=-536900125.0.00&pselect=SR.General > >I found the user interface counter - intuitive because some of the >controls wouldn't do their function apparent from the labeling. >It was sort of "You can't get there from here." Yeah, that model is similar to the one I was talking about. Mine is a 54845A - a bit less capable. I like that series, but it may be due to it's PC interface and pull-down menus. I've gotten so used to PC interfaces I actually use the mouse to control the scope more than the actual front panel. >Perhaps they have improved greatly in the intervening 16 years. >I certainly hope so. > >Have you used a TDS? The latest model I've used is the TDS7XX series. I like them as well, but would still take the Agilent over it any day. >Those are really nice. A very easy migration >to digital storage technology for those of us that started with tube - >type 'recurrent sweep' scopes. Even the 'help' system was easy to >understand and actually had helpful information. My first scope at work was a Tek 465, then a 2465B. Even had a 434A analog storage type at home. But once you go digital, you never go back. At least with me, anyway. :) Many die-hards would think of me as a blasphemer, I suppose. |