From: rmo555 on 5 Nov 2009 14:55 On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:56:21 +0200, Dave <d(a)ve.koza> wrote: >On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:32:26 -0500, Fruit2O <jz137xww(a)cox.net> wrote: > >>A number of years ago, I had software called Deep Paint and >>PhotoArtMaster. These pieces of software could, quite easily, make a >>photo look like a painting. Does anyone know of similar software >>available now? > >I don't agree. No software can 'quite easily' make a photo look like a >painting. If you are serious, you'll have to really do digital >painting by drawing the photos main lines with either Photoshop's Pen >Tool and continue by painting it with the Brush Tool, or use the best >software on the market therefore, which is Corel Painter. > (Not Paintshop but Painter) >This is not a plug-in work to do but time consuming and hard work. > >Dave > >http://kuns.fotopic.net/p53776192.html > >http://dave.photos.gb.net/p48939368.html > >http://dave.photos.gb.net/p40012705.html > >http://dave.photos.gb.net/p40012706.html > >http://dave.photos.gb.net/p43598472.html > > This is some really nice work!!
From: Noisy on 5 Nov 2009 15:04 There is the cut down vewrsion Painter Essentials which might be a good place to start. Rather like starting PS with Elements and moving up
From: Kabuki on 5 Nov 2009 15:23 "Dave" <d(a)ve.koza> wrote in message news:gj66f5dd2t7r93plg06j1pjbhd2rtqq2ok(a)4ax.com... > On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:32:26 -0500, Fruit2O <jz137xww(a)cox.net> wrote: > >>A number of years ago, I had software called Deep Paint and >>PhotoArtMaster. These pieces of software could, quite easily, make a >>photo look like a painting. Does anyone know of similar software >>available now? > > I don't agree. No software can 'quite easily' make a photo look like a > painting. If you are serious, you'll have to really do digital > painting by drawing the photos main lines with either Photoshop's Pen > Tool and continue by painting it with the Brush Tool, or use the best > software on the market therefore, which is Corel Painter. > (Not Paintshop but Painter) > This is not a plug-in work to do but time consuming and hard work. > > Dave > > http://kuns.fotopic.net/p53776192.html > > http://dave.photos.gb.net/p48939368.html > > http://dave.photos.gb.net/p40012705.html > > http://dave.photos.gb.net/p40012706.html > > http://dave.photos.gb.net/p43598472.html like the portrait of the red-haired lady- good work
From: Dave on 5 Nov 2009 16:27 >From: rmo555(a)cox.net > >This is some really nice work!! >, "Kabuki" <masqued(a)ball.net> wrote: > >like the portrait of the red-haired lady- good work > My thanks for the compliments and the nice words. This is apreciated:-) Dave
From: rmo555 on 5 Nov 2009 19:09 On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 20:04:05 GMT, Noisy(a)noisy.com wrote: >There is the cut down vewrsion Painter Essentials which might be a good >place to start. Rather like starting PS with Elements and moving up I'm used to PS - even though I haven't used it in a while - been ill. I'll check out Painter Essentials. In the meantime, could you help me started in PhotoArtMaster? I just tried it last night and finally took it off my system. It's an original version. What happens is that I'll open a photo - then click on Studio. When I do that, I get a blank canvas. Why does this happen? Am I doing something wrong?
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: rotate guide line in CS3 Next: EXIF editor for Mac OS X. |