Looking for a tool
in [Windows XP]
|
From: Unknown on 19 Mar 2010 16:38 Do you use a time base for everything? Are you paid by the hour? "Terry R." <F1Com(a)NOSPAMpobox.com> wrote in message news:ekP7SB6xKHA.812(a)TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > On 3/19/2010 12:38 PM On a whim, glee pounded out on the keyboard > >> "Terry R."<F1Com(a)NOSPAMpobox.com> wrote in message >> news:ukRhsX3xKHA.5480(a)TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >>> On 3/18/2010 10:45 AM On a whim, Unknown pounded out on the keyboard >>> >>>> You assume far too much. >>> >>> So I assumed with a response and a valid answer. And your posts did >>> what? >>> >>> >>> Terry R. >> >> <sheesh> You've replied to almost everyone's reply in this thread to >> tell them how their answer is not as good as yours, and is wrong. >> Regedit will do exactly what the user wants, one entry at a time. It is >> a perfectly valid answer. That it is less CONVENIENT than a third-party >> tool does not make it less correct. > > Until John pipes back in and states he never knew regedit existed, I'm > sticking with my recommendation. > > You see MVP's badmouthing tools like I suggest but then lamely suggest > regedit. And like I said to another replier, using regedit is good IF > you're getting paid by the hour and your client doesn't realize you're > using something that takes um-teen times longer than a tool I suggested. > > I'm pretty confident the OP knows of regedit and was looking for a "tool" > (like the subject states) that searched the entire registry at once AND > displayed the results for ALL. > > And you forgot to close your tag. Bad coding... > > > Terry R. > -- > Anti-spam measures are included in my email address. > Delete NOSPAM from the email address after clicking Reply.
From: glee on 20 Mar 2010 00:37 "Terry R." <F1Com(a)NOSPAMpobox.com> wrote in message news:ekP7SB6xKHA.812(a)TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > On 3/19/2010 12:38 PM On a whim, glee pounded out on the keyboard > >> "Terry R."<F1Com(a)NOSPAMpobox.com> wrote in message >> news:ukRhsX3xKHA.5480(a)TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >>> On 3/18/2010 10:45 AM On a whim, Unknown pounded out on the keyboard >>> >>>> You assume far too much. >>> >>> So I assumed with a response and a valid answer. And your posts did >>> what? >>> >>> >>> Terry R. >> >> <sheesh> You've replied to almost everyone's reply in this thread to >> tell them how their answer is not as good as yours, and is wrong. >> Regedit will do exactly what the user wants, one entry at a time. It >> is >> a perfectly valid answer. That it is less CONVENIENT than a >> third-party >> tool does not make it less correct. > > Until John pipes back in and states he never knew regedit existed, I'm > sticking with my recommendation. > > You see MVP's badmouthing tools like I suggest but then lamely suggest > regedit. And like I said to another replier, using regedit is good IF > you're getting paid by the hour and your client doesn't realize you're > using something that takes um-teen times longer than a tool I > suggested. > > I'm pretty confident the OP knows of regedit and was looking for a > "tool" (like the subject states) that searched the entire registry at > once AND displayed the results for ALL. > > And you forgot to close your tag. Bad coding... You can recommend whatever you like....the only one in this thread bad-mouthing other replies is you, d00d....and you are still going on about it. I didn't "forget to close my tag", because there are no HTML tags in a plain-text newsgroup post, made through a newsserver, posting with a newsreader set to plain text. I don't know what newsreader you are using, that shows plain text posts as HTML...maybe you should fix your reader or your settings to display correctly? -- Glen Ventura, MS MVP Oct. 2002 - Sept. 2009 A+ http://dts-l.net/
From: Greg Russell on 20 Mar 2010 03:25 "glee" <glee29(a)spamindspring.com> wrote in message news:O1WX8b%23xKHA.5576(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >>> <sheesh> You've replied to almost everyone's reply in this thread ... .... >> And you forgot to close your tag. Bad coding... .... > I didn't "forget to close my tag", because there are no HTML tags in a > plain-text newsgroup post, ... Who said anything about HTML? She was obviously referring to your opening <sheesh> tag.
From: Unknown on 20 Mar 2010 12:20 SHE?????????? "Greg Russell" <grussell(a)invalid.com> wrote in message news:80jbivFi50U1(a)mid.individual.net... > "glee" <glee29(a)spamindspring.com> wrote in message > news:O1WX8b%23xKHA.5576(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > >>>> <sheesh> You've replied to almost everyone's reply in this thread ... > ... >>> And you forgot to close your tag. Bad coding... > ... >> I didn't "forget to close my tag", because there are no HTML tags in a >> plain-text newsgroup post, ... > > Who said anything about HTML? She was obviously referring to your opening > <sheesh> tag. > >
From: glee on 20 Mar 2010 13:21
"Greg Russell" <grussell(a)invalid.com> wrote in message news:80jbivFi50U1(a)mid.individual.net... > "glee" <glee29(a)spamindspring.com> wrote in message > news:O1WX8b%23xKHA.5576(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > >>>> <sheesh> You've replied to almost everyone's reply in this thread >>>> ... > ... >>> And you forgot to close your tag. Bad coding... > ... >> I didn't "forget to close my tag", because there are no HTML tags in >> a >> plain-text newsgroup post, ... > > Who said anything about HTML? She was obviously referring to your > opening > <sheesh> tag. <brackets> can be used for things other than tags....for instance, as a comment, such as <heh-heh> which would not require a closing </heh-heh> because it's a comment not a tag. <sheesh> was a comment. I must have missed that it was meant in humour due to the lack of an indication such as a smiley or a <jk> comment....or are you going to tell me that <jk> is a tag and must be closed too?? That's a <jk> BTW, FWIW <heh-heh> :) -- Glen Ventura, MS MVP Oct. 2002 - Sept. 2009 A+ http://dts-l.net/ |