Prev: Signs of (Mathematical) Life
Next: Fraternal Twins going equally fast at all times?
From: spudnik on 25 Jun 2010 14:06
well it's a good experiment, "coking" water and
calcium carbonate to make these hydrocarbs
"up to 20 carbons," but I misread the statement
about "oil theory with currect [sic] genesis." presumably,
the neologism indicates that the current "impact theory"
of lunar genesis is neither here nor there nor correct,
being based really on computerized simulacra and
a gross lack of data (no space program in the USA ...
no energy policy, either, but cap&trade on CO2, a-hem;
also, who told me that all of the USA seismometers etc.
from Apollo were arbitrarily turned-off, supposedly
with no recourse toe turn them back, on?

anyway, given the low seismic inactivity of Moon,
it is hard to see active seeps on it, as in Gulf or
off of Redondo Beach, Calif., which seems
to be a requirement of the abiotic theory, which seems
to propose that the T & P are ultimately due
to fission (also, fusion?) within Earth.

> > This abiotic oil theory along with the currect genesis

thus&so:
the acolyte of Hubbard at Shell, wrote a couple
of books that lay-out many of the indsutry's assumptions,
_Peak Oil_ and _Beyond Oil_, if somewhat Greeny -- and
very-much "better late, than never."

presumably the processing of biogenic oil
in the tectonic system would degrade the chirality etc.;
I mean, there are all sorts of organic plastics
in the sediment, and enormous production of it on Earth. so,
is one really to presume that none of this gets
into the system -- that it is somehow to be called,
fossilized fuels (TM) ??

--BP loves Waxman-Obama cap&trade (at least circa Kyoto, or
Waxman's '91 cap&trade on NOX and SO2) --
how about a tiny tax, instead of the Last Bailout
of Wall Street and the "City of London?"
http://larouchepub.com/pr_lar/2010/lar_pac/100621pne_nordyke.html

--le theoreme prochaine du Fermatttt!
http://wlym.com
From: spudnik on 2 Jul 2010 15:26
like, I typed.

thus&so:
so, acid rain is the germain topic, since
it was the First Cap and Trade, and also Waxman's '91 bill. so,
what I haven't seen dyscussed in the WSUrinal e.g.,
is just how wonderfully this'd worked --
who made the money in the God-am "free market?"

thus quoth:
Miskolczi saith in <http://www.met.hu/doc/idojaras/vol111001_01.pdf>
> You are so full of it.

thus&so:
what if the same guy who was the source d'Eaugate
for Bernward at the Post [*], was also the Vice President,
who purposely set his mattress on fire in the first tower
(second was hit by a 757 filled with fuel for most
of a transcontinental flight, minus the steering loop);
and, so, how many mattresses'd he have'd to set,
to make for a controlled demolition?
well, some of us believe that
he was not just the acting president --
especially since the impeachment of Bill C..
also, what in Heck is a one-ball centrifuge --
doesn't one need two, at the least, for balance?
* in the famed parlance of editor Bradley, or ms. Graham,
Woodstein ne'er followed the Penzoil money to <a-hem>;
see http://tarpley.net/online-books/george-bush-the-unauthorized-biography/

--BP's cap&trade plus free beer/miles on your CO2 creds at ARCO!
http://wlym.
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Signs of (Mathematical) Life
Next: Fraternal Twins going equally fast at all times?