Prev: [PATCH][RFC] x86: remove SMP check/taint for AMD K7 (was Re: KVM warning about uncertified CPU for SMP for AMD model 2, stepping 3)
Next: sched: check for prev_cpu == this_cpu before calling wake_affine()
From: Patrick McHardy on 31 Mar 2010 04:30 Anders Darander wrote: > From: Anders Darander <ad(a)datarespons.se> > > Add the possibility to set the phy address. This is needed if an integrated > switch is connected to the MAC, as it is often the case that the highest port > is the one connected to the MAC of the MCU. > > E.g. in the case of the Micrel KSZ8873, port 3 is the one to connect to the > MCU, thus, the MAC needs to connect to phy address 0x03, instead of the first > phy found. > > Signed-off-by: Anders Darander <ad(a)datarespons.se> > --- > drivers/net/macb.c | 14 +++++++++++++- > 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/macb.c b/drivers/net/macb.c > index c8a18a6..9b4e301 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/macb.c > +++ b/drivers/net/macb.c > @@ -53,6 +53,14 @@ > #define MACB_RX_INT_FLAGS (MACB_BIT(RCOMP) | MACB_BIT(RXUBR) \ > | MACB_BIT(ISR_ROVR)) > > +/* > + * Setup PHY probeing > + */ > + > +static int phy_addr = PHY_MAX_ADDR; > +module_param(phy_addr, ushort, 0); > +MODULE_PARAM_DESC(phy_addr, "PHY address connected to the MACB"); > + > static void __macb_set_hwaddr(struct macb *bp) > { > u32 bottom; > @@ -193,7 +201,11 @@ static int macb_mii_probe(struct net_device *dev) > struct eth_platform_data *pdata; > int ret; > > - phydev = phy_find_first(bp->mii_bus); > + if (phy_addr >= PHY_MAX_ADDRESS) > + phydev = phy_find_first(bp->mii_bus); > + else > + phydev = bp->mii_bus->phy_map[phy_addr]; This looks like you need to use an unsigned to avoid negative indices. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Anders Darander on 31 Mar 2010 05:00 * Patrick McHardy <kaber(a)trash.net> [100331 10:29]: > Anders Darander wrote: > > + if (phy_addr >= PHY_MAX_ADDRESS) > > + phydev = phy_find_first(bp->mii_bus); > > + else > > + phydev = bp->mii_bus->phy_map[phy_addr]; > This looks like you need to use an unsigned to avoid negative > indices. Thanks for spotting this. That made me find that I'd also been inconsistent with the variable and module parameter declarations. A new version, V2, of the patch has been sent. Best regards, Anders Darander -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Marc Kleine-Budde on 31 Mar 2010 05:20 Anders Darander wrote: > From: Anders Darander <ad(a)datarespons.se> > > Add the possibility to set the phy address. This is needed if an integrated > switch is connected to the MAC, as it is often the case that the highest port > is the one connected to the MAC of the MCU. > > E.g. in the case of the Micrel KSZ8873, port 3 is the one to connect to the > MCU, thus, the MAC needs to connect to phy address 0x03, instead of the first > phy found. We're using phy_mask in one of our projects, it's still using 2.6.29, though. I think it's worth testing if it's still working. static struct at91_eth_data __initdata p298_macb_data = { .is_rmii = 0, .phy_mask = ~(1 << 8), }; at91_add_device_eth(&p298_macb_data); cheers, Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
From: Marc Kleine-Budde on 31 Mar 2010 05:50 Anders Darander wrote: > * Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl(a)pengutronix.de> [100331 11:18]: >> We're using phy_mask in one of our projects, it's still using 2.6.29, >> though. I think it's worth testing if it's still working. > > Well, that was obviously something I overlooked / misinterpreted when I > tried to solve our problem! > > As I understand it, phy_mask is a bitfield for setting which PHYs should > be enabled... Then this should have worked OK for us! Yes, it's a bitmask of PHYs that should be probed. >> static struct at91_eth_data __initdata p298_macb_data = { >> .is_rmii = 0, >> .phy_mask = ~(1 << 8), >> }; > >> at91_add_device_eth(&p298_macb_data); > > I've not tested it, but it should probably have worked. Cheers, Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
From: Anders Darander on 31 Mar 2010 05:50
* Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl(a)pengutronix.de> [100331 11:18]: > We're using phy_mask in one of our projects, it's still using 2.6.29, > though. I think it's worth testing if it's still working. Well, that was obviously something I overlooked / misinterpreted when I tried to solve our problem! As I understand it, phy_mask is a bitfield for setting which PHYs should be enabled... Then this should have worked OK for us! > static struct at91_eth_data __initdata p298_macb_data = { > .is_rmii = 0, > .phy_mask = ~(1 << 8), > }; > at91_add_device_eth(&p298_macb_data); I've not tested it, but it should probably have worked. Regards, Anders -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |