From: Peter Olcott on 10 Aug 2010 21:14 On 8/10/2010 6:44 PM, Dave "Crash" Dummy wrote: > wolf_tracks(a)invalid.com wrote: >> This is strange. Undermsnew.microsoft.com NG server I have 10 NGs. I >> just tried accessing several of them. microsoft.public.outlook is one. >> I'm getting msgs that they do not exist on the host. What's up with that? > > Microsoft is going out of the NNTP business infavor of web based forums > (yuk!). Many of the groups (including this one) are also carried on > Usenet servers. You might look for your missing groups there. I can't find it there. In fact I was referred to this group from the web based groups. There is a Visual Basic group there. but apparently no VBScript group. -- 100% Accurate Display Screen OCR http://www.OCR4Screen.com
From: Mayayana on 10 Aug 2010 23:16 | I can't find it there. In fact I was referred to this group from the web | based groups. There is a Visual Basic group there. but apparently no | VBScript group. | There's a "scripting guys" forum here: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/ITCG/threads But... - It's a web forum, which is difficult to use. - It requires signing up for a Live ID and logging in. - It's moderated and filtered at will by MS employees. - That single forum is the catchall for all Windows scripting, which means several languages are being discussed at once, often without any clear indication in a given post of what language is being dealt with. It's like having one group for the Win32 API, with people posting willy nilly about C++, Delphi, VB, .Net, etc. There's no reason to wrestle with that as long as the usenet groups are available. There are a lot of knowledgeable people who frequent this group, with no indication that the group will ever disappear as long as there are usenet servers.
From: Peter Olcott on 11 Aug 2010 00:11 On 8/10/2010 10:16 PM, Mayayana wrote: > | I can't find it there. In fact I was referred to this group from the web > | based groups. There is a Visual Basic group there. but apparently no > | VBScript group. > | > There's a "scripting guys" forum here: > > http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/ITCG/threads > > But... > > - It's a web forum, which is difficult to use. > > - It requires signing up for a Live ID and logging in. > > - It's moderated and filtered at will by MS employees. > > - That single forum is the catchall for all Windows > scripting, which means several languages are being > discussed at once, often without any clear indication > in a given post of what language is being dealt with. > It's like having one group for the Win32 API, with > people posting willy nilly about C++, Delphi, VB, .Net, > etc. > > There's no reason to wrestle with that as long as > the usenet groups are available. There are a lot of > knowledgeable people who frequent this group, with > no indication that the group will ever disappear as long > as there are usenet servers. > > Yes, but, many of these groups have already become inaccessible. It may only be a very short amount of time before this group no longer works. -- 100% Accurate Display Screen OCR http://www.OCR4Screen.com
From: Mayayana on 11 Aug 2010 08:24 | > There's no reason to wrestle with that as long as | > the usenet groups are available. There are a lot of | > knowledgeable people who frequent this group, with | > no indication that the group will ever disappear as long | > as there are usenet servers. | > | | Yes, but, many of these groups have already become inaccessible. It may | only be a very short amount of time before this group no longer works. | No, they're not inaccessible. You misunderstood the explanation. MS is closing their server. If you go to msnews.microsoft.com (or whatever the address is), most of the groups are gone. By October the MS server will be shut down. You should be fine with giganews, but if you find that there are groups you can't reach now then you might want to switch servers. Newsgroups are decentralized. Microsoft's action does not directly affect any other server, despite the fact that the groups have "microsoft" in their names. It's a bit like if Novell's Suse Linux ISO server went down. You wouldn't be able to download Suse Linux from them. But all the mirror sites would be unaffected. Microsoft may send out a notice of their closing, but many/most (all?) servers are not expected to act on that. Microsoft has already closed groups that I still have no trouble getting. It's likely that the only way the groups will really close down is if Microsoft gets really ugly, strongarming the various NNTP services with threats of a lawsuit. (I have no idea whether that's likely or even possible.)
From: "Dave "Crash" Dummy" on 11 Aug 2010 09:30 Mayayana wrote: > As Dave "Crash" Dummy said, MS is closing down their server. Shenan > Stanley has provided Microsoft's explanation, but that's pretty much > useless. The new web forums are unusable, and moderated by MS people. > The "bridge" software to emulate a proper newsreader for the web > forums has received bad reviews from people using it. > > The gist of it is that MS has discontinued hosting customer > discussion and help groups on Usenet. But Usenet is decentralized, so > many of the servers will continue to host the groups. You just have > to switch your server from MS to your ISP or other Usenet server. > Most should have the MS groups. I'm using a free server connection > from eternal-september.org. It seems to work well. I am subscribed to "microsoft.public.scripting.vbscript" and "microsoft.public.scripting.wsh" on my Charter Usenet server. I have pulled the msnews account from my newsreader altogether. A rough count shows 456 microsoft.public, 80 microsoft.private, and 131 microsoft.beta groups listed on my Charter news server. There are other groups with "microsoft" in the name, but I don't know if they were really MS groups. -- Crash Committed to the search for intraterrestrial intelligence.
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: Simple hack to get $3000 to your home Next: combine 2 vbs into one |