From: Nige Danton on 26 Jun 2010 01:20 Another question about MacSoup: can it be configured so that links in posts are clickable instead of having to copy and paste the url into a browser? -- Nige Danton email: replace the obvious with g_m_a_i_l --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news(a)netfront.net ---
From: Jim on 26 Jun 2010 01:31 Nige Danton <nige.danton(a)nospam.com> wrote: > Another question about MacSoup: can it be configured so that links in > posts are clickable instead of having to copy and paste the url into a > browser? <http://www.google.com> You should be able to command-click the link. There's some debate over how much the <>'s are needed. Jim -- "Microsoft admitted its Vista operating system was a 'less good product' in what IT experts have described as the most ambitious understatement since the captain of the Titanic reported some slightly damp tablecloths." http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/
From: Andy Hewitt on 26 Jun 2010 04:02 Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> wrote: > Nige Danton <nige.danton(a)nospam.com> wrote: > > > Another question about MacSoup: can it be configured so that links in > > posts are clickable instead of having to copy and paste the url into a > > browser? > > <http://www.google.com> > > You should be able to command-click the link. There's some debate over > how much the <>'s are needed. They're only needed if the line gets wrapped. -- Andy Hewitt <http://web.me.com/andrewhewitt1/>
From: Nige Danton on 26 Jun 2010 04:35 Andy Hewitt <thewildrover(a)me.com> wrote: > Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> wrote: > > > > <http://www.google.com> > > > > You should be able to command-click the link. There's some debate over > > how much the <>'s are needed. > > They're only needed if the line gets wrapped. Excellent, thanks very much. -- Nige Danton email: replace the obvious with g_m_a_i_l --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news(a)netfront.net ---
From: Peter Ceresole on 26 Jun 2010 05:08
Andy Hewitt <thewildrover(a)me.com> wrote: > > You should be able to command-click the link. There's some debate over > > how much the <>'s are needed. > > They're only needed if the line gets wrapped. But it does no harm to include then anyway. -- Peter |