Prev: ARINDAM BANERJEE, the South Hemisphere Physics Genius nails the Einstein 's groveling sycophants of the well documented Intellectual Thief to the barn door !
Next: What does a gluon look like?
From: mathematician on 15 Apr 2010 01:35 I looked the Standard Model page from Wikipedia, and I noticed that one important matter which I remember that H-M told long time a go was that "Magnetic monopole is half a gluon" I have thought possibilities that magnetic monopoles could be those small right neutrinos binded as couples or magnetic monopoles could be right and wrong neutrino couples binded together ? Hannu Poropudas
From: mathematician on 15 Apr 2010 04:33 On 15 huhti, 08:35, mathematician <hapor...(a)luukku.com> wrote: > I looked the Standard Model page from Wikipedia, and > I noticed that one important matter which I remember > that H-M told long time a go was that > > "Magnetic monopole is half a gluon" Sorry my writing error. Corrrect words are: "Magnetic monopole is half of a gluon" > > I have thought possibilities that magnetic monopoles > could be those small right neutrinos binded as couples > or magnetic monopoles could be right and wrong neutrino > couples binded together ? > > Hannu Poropudas
From: Androcles on 15 Apr 2010 05:26 "mathematician" <haporopu(a)luukku.com> wrote in message news:be0f23fa-dc04-4087-af85-1b3a7042f1eb(a)i37g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... > On 15 huhti, 08:35, mathematician <hapor...(a)luukku.com> wrote: >> I looked the Standard Model page from Wikipedia, and >> I noticed that one important matter which I remember >> that H-M told long time a go was that >> >> "Magnetic monopole is half a gluon" > > Sorry my writing error. Corrrect words are: > > "Magnetic monopole is half of a gluon" > Not an error, either is acceptable. Half of a crown would be wrong here, but half-a-crown or a half-crown would be correct. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Half_crown_(British_coin) >> >> I have thought possibilities that magnetic monopoles >> could be those small right neutrinos binded as couples >> or magnetic monopoles could be right and wrong neutrino >> couples binded together ? >> >> Hannu Poropudas >
From: Puppet_Sock on 15 Apr 2010 10:58 On Apr 15, 1:35 am, mathematician <hapor...(a)luukku.com> wrote: > I looked the Standard Model page from Wikipedia, and > I noticed that one important matter which I remember > that H-M told long time a go was that > > "Magnetic monopole is half a gluon" > > I have thought possibilities that magnetic monopoles > could be those small right neutrinos binded as couples > or magnetic monopoles could be right and wrong neutrino > couples binded together ? Word salad is not a substitute for careful thought. A gluon is an intermediate vector bozon for the strong force. A magnetic monopole is a (postulated but not yet observed) particle with a magnetic charge. It arises from some grand and super unification theories. In those theories it does not arise in any way related to "half a gluon." The interactions a gluon may go through do not include splitting in half to form a magnetic monopole. Monopoles arise in a theory that involves symmetry breaking. Because magnetic field lines ordinarly do not have an end, there has to be some special process that allows them to have a source or sync at a magnetic charge. This is done through spontaneous symmetry breaking in the usual theory that involves them. Socks
From: eric gisse on 15 Apr 2010 11:24
mathematician wrote: > I looked the Standard Model page from Wikipedia [...] lol |