From: mathematician on
I looked the Standard Model page from Wikipedia, and
I noticed that one important matter which I remember
that H-M told long time a go was that

"Magnetic monopole is half a gluon"

I have thought possibilities that magnetic monopoles
could be those small right neutrinos binded as couples
or magnetic monopoles could be right and wrong neutrino
couples binded together ?

Hannu Poropudas
From: mathematician on
On 15 huhti, 08:35, mathematician <hapor...(a)luukku.com> wrote:
> I looked the Standard Model page from Wikipedia, and
> I noticed that one important matter which I remember
> that H-M told long time a go was that
>
> "Magnetic monopole is half a gluon"

Sorry my writing error. Corrrect words are:

"Magnetic monopole is half of a gluon"

>
> I have thought possibilities that magnetic monopoles
> could be those small right neutrinos binded as couples
> or magnetic monopoles could be right and wrong neutrino
> couples binded together ?
>
> Hannu Poropudas

From: Androcles on

"mathematician" <haporopu(a)luukku.com> wrote in message
news:be0f23fa-dc04-4087-af85-1b3a7042f1eb(a)i37g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
> On 15 huhti, 08:35, mathematician <hapor...(a)luukku.com> wrote:
>> I looked the Standard Model page from Wikipedia, and
>> I noticed that one important matter which I remember
>> that H-M told long time a go was that
>>
>> "Magnetic monopole is half a gluon"
>
> Sorry my writing error. Corrrect words are:
>
> "Magnetic monopole is half of a gluon"
>

Not an error, either is acceptable.

Half of a crown would be wrong here, but
half-a-crown or a half-crown would be correct.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Half_crown_(British_coin)






>>
>> I have thought possibilities that magnetic monopoles
>> could be those small right neutrinos binded as couples
>> or magnetic monopoles could be right and wrong neutrino
>> couples binded together ?
>>
>> Hannu Poropudas
>

From: Puppet_Sock on
On Apr 15, 1:35 am, mathematician <hapor...(a)luukku.com> wrote:
> I looked the Standard Model page from Wikipedia, and
> I noticed that one important matter which I remember
> that H-M told long time a go was that
>
> "Magnetic monopole is half a gluon"
>
> I have thought possibilities that magnetic monopoles
> could be those small right neutrinos binded as couples
> or magnetic monopoles could be right and wrong neutrino
> couples binded together ?

Word salad is not a substitute for careful thought.

A gluon is an intermediate vector bozon for the strong force.

A magnetic monopole is a (postulated but not yet observed)
particle with a magnetic charge. It arises from some grand
and super unification theories. In those theories it does not
arise in any way related to "half a gluon."

The interactions a gluon may go through do not include
splitting in half to form a magnetic monopole.

Monopoles arise in a theory that involves symmetry breaking.
Because magnetic field lines ordinarly do not have an end,
there has to be some special process that allows them to
have a source or sync at a magnetic charge. This is done
through spontaneous symmetry breaking in the usual theory
that involves them.
Socks
From: eric gisse on
mathematician wrote:

> I looked the Standard Model page from Wikipedia [...]

lol