From: John Larkin on
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:04:07 -0800 (PST), George Herold
<ggherold(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>On Feb 10, 10:34�pm, "Phil Allison" <phi...(a)tpg.com.au> wrote:
>> "George Herold"
>> �"Phil Allison"
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > ** Push-pull class A is the MOST COMMON method use in tube and transistor
>> > audio power amplifiers.
>>
>> > With transistor amps, it is only necessary to set to standing bias current
>> > to a high value like an amp or two.
>>
>> > > You can, but it stops being class A for large signal swings or low load
>> > > impedances.
>>
>> > ** No need for either thing to happen.
>>
>> > One picks the load to suit the amplifier and the peak ( class A) current
>> > is
>> > double the bias setting current.
>>
>> > Eg:
>>
>> > With a bias of 2 amps, peak load current is 4amps which allows +/-32 volts
>> > into 8 ohms.
>>
>> > Class A power is then 64 watts rms.
>>
>> > The DC rails need to be about +/- 35 volts and the supply current a steady
>> > 2
>> > amps.
>>
>> Do you just use a current source as bias as in the Amps from Pass labs?
>>
>> ** No �- �doing that is utterly STUPID.
>>
>> The only difference between a class A and class B push-pull amp �IS �the
>> bias setting.
>>
>> One just turns the bias trim pot to get the desired standing current or with
>> tubes adjust the grid bias to get the same result.
>>
>> > Tubes can't do push-pull because "it's hard to get positrons from the
>> > filament" �to parapharse what I read.
>>
>> ** How pathetic.
>>
>> .... � �Phil- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>Excellent, Thanks Phil. Crank up the bias.
>
>I think almost everything I build runs class A. I set a DC bias and
>then modulate on top of it. I run an opamp into a pass element, apply
>feedback and then make the load 'look' as resistive as possible.
>(Then cross your fingers and see if that works.)
>
>
>So how do you do push pull with tubes, or say with only Jon's npn
>transistors?
>
>George H.

Usually two "NPN" tubes whose plates drive a center-tapped output
transformer.

John

From: George Herold on
On Feb 11, 11:08 pm, "Phil Allison" <phi...(a)tpg.com.au> wrote:
> "George Herold
>
> So how do you do push pull with tubes, or say with only Jon's npn
> transistors?
>
> ** There are literally  *millions* of push-pull tube amps in use -  the vast
> majority of tube hifi and guitar amps are push pull designs.
>
> NPN output transistor amps are called "quasi-complementary push pull "  -
> many millions of them  made and sold too.
>
> Use Google to find the schems.
>
> Idiot.
>
> ....  Phil

Thanks Phil I'll try google. Why are there still so many tube amps?
You'd think someone could make a solid state amp that sounded
'right'.

George H.
From: Ban on

"George Herold" <ggherold(a)gmail.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:31c905ec-8918-4164-87e8-b524d6b9a156(a)i39g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 11, 5:27 pm, Jon Kirwan <j...(a)infinitefactors.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:50:23 -0700, Jim Thompson
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I'd still like to _learn_ about FAB processes, geometries,
> mask steps, subtrates (and if any BJTs include a bond to such
> things), and differences between them. For example, I've
> heard you talk about processes that include gold as a step
> (or more?) I'd like to know what does what. I can (and have
> attempted) a few 2D spatial integrals aka Hauser's analysis
> of crowding on r_b many years ago, and I'm vaguely aware of
> the fact that he neglected to account for lateral base
> diffusion which happens when the crowding and some local base
> widening takes place. I actually _did_ take measurements of
> real Hamamatsu diodes, years ago, and reversed out from the
> measurements what the dopant concentrations had to have been
> so that I could better model the behavior over a wide range
> of temperature operations (Hamamatsu flatly refused to give
> me any such information.) The resulting model I created
> _did_ model that photodiode at -40C to 55C better than I'd
> expected it to do and much better than the gross models I had
> at the time were able. So at some point, I'd like to study
> these things to get a better feel... but I'd like to know who
> has what FABs and what the processes are capable of and
> produce.
>
> I hope it's not as difficult as pulling dopant numbers out of
> Hamamatsu was! I'm not wanting to know specific recipes or
> anything -- just process capabilities. Hopefully, FAB and
> process capabilities and locations are something that is
> known about and published. I can hope.
>
> Jon- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -


A very comprehensive book, bible lets say is
The Crcuits and Filters Handbook by Chen
don't get fooled by "Handbook", it's the biggest book I got. :-))
ciao Ban


From: Ban on

"George Herold" <ggherold(a)gmail.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:f7a4838e-716b-40a8-9b19-7c65cf86dff9(a)o3g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 11, 11:08 pm, "Phil Allison" <phi...(a)tpg.com.au> wrote:
> "George Herold
>
> So how do you do push pull with tubes, or say with only Jon's npn
> transistors?
>
> ** There are literally *millions* of push-pull tube amps in use - the vast
> majority of tube hifi and guitar amps are push pull designs.
>
> NPN output transistor amps are called "quasi-complementary push pull " -
> many millions of them made and sold too.
>
> Use Google to find the schems.
>
> Idiot.
>
> .... Phil

>Thanks Phil I'll try google. Why are there still so many tube amps?
>You'd think someone could make a solid state amp that sounded
>'right'.

A lot of transistor amps sound right, but some people prefer to add a bit of
2nd harmonics, or they want to enjoy the gloom.
ciao Ban


From: Ban on

"Phil Hobbs" <pcdhSpamMeSenseless(a)electrooptical.net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:U9-dnabS2fr6SOnWnZ2dnUVZ_uti4p2d(a)supernews.com...
> On 2/11/2010 10:35 PM, George Herold wrote:
>> On Feb 11, 1:14 pm, John Larkin
>>>
>>> If you drive both adjust pins with the signal input, the 317 output is
>>> Vin+1.25 and the 337 output is Vin-1.25. Connect them to the output
>>> through a couple of resistors, valued to set the idle current. Where's
>>> the deadband?
>>>
>>> Or you can take the output from the 317 output pin, with the 337 now
>>> acting like a constant-current sink to the 317.
>>>
>>> I like to use LM1117s as power emitter followers, inside the loop of
>>> an opamp. That makes a cheap, well protected power driver, for load
>>> cell excitation and such. I did a bunch of tests to see whether
>>> flailing the adj pin can damage the regulator, and never managed to
>>> break one.
>>>
>>> John
>>
>> Cool! I think I got it... though if I try it in the future and let
>> the smoke out of something... then I might have questions.
>>
>> George H.
>
> IIRC the LM395 is basically an LM309 with the voltage reference removed.
> Emitter-follower regulators are nearly bulletproof unless you discharge a
> cap into the output.
>
or the reference input. But some power diode antiparallel will take care of
that.
ciao Ban