Prev: 2008 R2 and dns update
Next: Setup a NTP server on W2K3
From: sweeneysmsm on 15 Jun 2010 10:29
I am not a networking person. I design Access databases.

My client wants two people to be able to use an Access database on a server
(that has Groups and users assigned) but that only one person at a time can
open it. I have told them that the recommended solution is to split the
database into front-end and back-end but their network person doesn't want me
to do this(?)... I can lock down records in tables, but not the database. Can
the network administrator set usage to a single person at a time?

From: Phillip Windell on 15 Jun 2010 11:15
If you want only one to edit it at a time then *don't* split it. The 2nd,
3rd, 4th person can only open it as "read-only". You cannot stop mulitple
people from using it,...you can only stop multiple people from editing it.

It you want multiple people to edit it then you *must* split it. It
doesn't matter what the networking person wants or does not want,...things
are what they are, and Access does not care about what he thinks.

So your idea is backwards. Split = multiple editors Not Split = one
editor, first come first server.


--
Phillip Windell

The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft,
or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
-----------------------------------------------------


"sweeneysmsm" <sweeneysmsm(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:7FC6C9C1-DD0F-4B23-9077-56DE506E6020(a)microsoft.com...
>I am not a networking person. I design Access databases.
>
> My client wants two people to be able to use an Access database on a
> server
> (that has Groups and users assigned) but that only one person at a time
> can
> open it. I have told them that the recommended solution is to split the
> database into front-end and back-end but their network person doesn't want
> me
> to do this(?)... I can lock down records in tables, but not the database.
> Can
> the network administrator set usage to a single person at a time?
>


From: russ yahoo account on 15 Jun 2010 15:20
No don'y split it then set the open rights to Exclusive only.


"Phillip Windell" <philwindell(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23agZQ3JDLHA.1368(a)TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> If you want only one to edit it at a time then *don't* split it. The 2nd,
> 3rd, 4th person can only open it as "read-only". You cannot stop mulitple
> people from using it,...you can only stop multiple people from editing it.
>
> It you want multiple people to edit it then you *must* split it. It
> doesn't matter what the networking person wants or does not want,...things
> are what they are, and Access does not care about what he thinks.
>
> So your idea is backwards. Split = multiple editors Not Split = one
> editor, first come first server.
>
>
> --
> Phillip Windell
>
> The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or
> Microsoft,
> or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>
> "sweeneysmsm" <sweeneysmsm(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:7FC6C9C1-DD0F-4B23-9077-56DE506E6020(a)microsoft.com...
>>I am not a networking person. I design Access databases.
>>
>> My client wants two people to be able to use an Access database on a
>> server
>> (that has Groups and users assigned) but that only one person at a time
>> can
>> open it. I have told them that the recommended solution is to split the
>> database into front-end and back-end but their network person doesn't
>> want me
>> to do this(?)... I can lock down records in tables, but not the database.
>> Can
>> the network administrator set usage to a single person at a time?
>>
>
>

From: Phillip Windell on 16 Jun 2010 10:39
We are saying the same thing,...other than I didn't mention the Open Rights.


--
Phillip Windell

The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft,
or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
-----------------------------------------------------


"russ yahoo account" <john_r_lancaster(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:e7rMh$LDLHA.1368(a)TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> No don'y split it then set the open rights to Exclusive only.
>
>
> "Phillip Windell" <philwindell(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:%23agZQ3JDLHA.1368(a)TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> If you want only one to edit it at a time then *don't* split it. The
>> 2nd, 3rd, 4th person can only open it as "read-only". You cannot stop
>> mulitple people from using it,...you can only stop multiple people from
>> editing it.
>>
>> It you want multiple people to edit it then you *must* split it. It
>> doesn't matter what the networking person wants or does not
>> want,...things are what they are, and Access does not care about what he
>> thinks.
>>
>> So your idea is backwards. Split = multiple editors Not Split = one
>> editor, first come first server.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Phillip Windell
>>
>> The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or
>> Microsoft,
>> or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
>> -----------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> "sweeneysmsm" <sweeneysmsm(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:7FC6C9C1-DD0F-4B23-9077-56DE506E6020(a)microsoft.com...
>>>I am not a networking person. I design Access databases.
>>>
>>> My client wants two people to be able to use an Access database on a
>>> server
>>> (that has Groups and users assigned) but that only one person at a time
>>> can
>>> open it. I have told them that the recommended solution is to split the
>>> database into front-end and back-end but their network person doesn't
>>> want me
>>> to do this(?)... I can lock down records in tables, but not the
>>> database. Can
>>> the network administrator set usage to a single person at a time?
>>>
>>
>>
>


 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: 2008 R2 and dns update
Next: Setup a NTP server on W2K3