From: adacrypt on

Mark-up cryptography means the mutual database technology that I am
promoting in which the ciphertext is virtually a scripting language
that indexes the arrays of the mutual databases. There are three
cipher implementations up and running with mathematical proof of this
crypto-type to hand.

Encapsulation cryptography means conventional ciphers in which the
plaintext is embedded within the ciphertext in some shape or form and
is protected by a key(s) that later enables the inversion of the
ciphertext back into the original plaintext. There is no unbreakable
cipher in existence and it can be demonstrated that it is impossible
to write one ever.

The cost of running this latter type of cryptography is enormous in
terms of the professional user-assistance that must be given to it by
graduate keyboard operators all over the world.

The burning question is “Why continue with this latter when something
far better i.e. unbreakable mark-up scripting ciphers, operable by non-
specialist everyday office workers is to hand” ? - adacrypt
From: Mok-Kong Shen on
adacrypt wrote:
>
> Mark-up cryptography means the mutual database technology ...[snip]

I doubt that "mutual databse" is a commonly used/understood term in the
field of database theory. Is that simply a huge codebook in the sense
of classical crypto?

M. K. Shen


From: adacrypt on
On Apr 30, 10:15 am, Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.s...(a)t-online.de> wrote:
> adacrypt wrote:
>
> > Mark-up cryptography means the mutual database technology ...[snip]
>
> I doubt that "mutual databse" is a commonly used/understood term in the
> field of database theory. Is that simply a huge codebook in the sense
> of classical crypto?
>
> M. K. Shen

Hi,

In this instance as applied to cryptography it means that Bob has an
exact copy of the arrays of data, the scrambling parameters, the slice
start points for arrays that Alice has used at her end to compile a
particular encrypted message. Collectively this is a database and
because it is common to both entities it is adjectively called a
mutual database. It is used over and over again in a different
permutation each time but is always mutually exact. - Cheers -
adacrypt
From: Mok-Kong Shen on
adacrypt wrote:
> Mok-Kong Shen wrote:
>> adacrypt wrote:
>>
>>> Mark-up cryptography means the mutual database technology ...[snip]
>>
>> I doubt that "mutual databse" is a commonly used/understood term in the
>> field of database theory. Is that simply a huge codebook in the sense
>> of classical crypto?

> Hi,
>
> In this instance as applied to cryptography it means that Bob has an
> exact copy of the arrays of data, the scrambling parameters, the slice
> start points for arrays that Alice has used at her end to compile a
> particular encrypted message. Collectively this is a database and
> because it is common to both entities it is adjectively called a
> mutual database. It is used over and over again in a different
> permutation each time but is always mutually exact. - Cheers -

You didn't answer my question.

M. K. Shen

From: adacrypt on
On Apr 30, 3:28 pm, Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.s...(a)t-online.de> wrote:
> adacrypt wrote:
> > Mok-Kong Shen  wrote:
> >> adacrypt wrote:
>
> >>> Mark-up cryptography means the mutual database technology ...[snip]
>
> >> I doubt that "mutual databse" is a commonly used/understood term in the
> >> field of database theory. Is that simply a huge codebook in the sense
> >> of classical crypto?
> > Hi,
>
> >   In this instance as applied to cryptography it means that Bob has an
> > exact copy of the arrays of data, the scrambling parameters, the slice
> > start points for arrays that Alice has used at her end to compile a
> > particular encrypted message.  Collectively this is a database and
> > because it is common to both entities it is adjectively called a
> > mutual database.  It is used over and over again in a different
> > permutation each time but is always mutually exact. - Cheers -
>
> You didn't answer my question.
>
> M. K. Shen- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

No , it is not a huge codebook in any way - it is instead comprised of
several large (say about a nominal 8000 elements each) arrays of
mathematical integer operands that are called by a computer to enable
the one-way mathematical functions of this cryptography to proceed -
come again if you are still not clear.
Being merely a very large code book is unthinkable to me - that would
be far too facile and vulnerable for say national security -
unthinkable ! - this cryptography is totally number-theoretic and
symmetrically function-based rather than mere mapping of code points -
the algorithms are very mathematically prodigious - adacrypt.