Prev: Sagnac Revisited. Why Paul and Awilson are Hopelessly Wrong.
Next: The electron is not a point.
From: waldofj on 3 Mar 2010 03:38
On Mar 3, 1:00 am, "Peter Webb" <webbfam...(a)DIESPAMDIEoptusnet.com.au>
wrote:
> "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_u> wrote in message
>
> news:bumjn.216454$kR2.158172(a)newsfe05.ams2...
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Henry Wilson DSc" <..@..> wrote in message
> >news:24fro59c21e46ujo9spvogjdmp0mass3jc(a)4ax.com...
> >> On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 11:51:32 +1100, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com>
> >> wrote:
>
> >>>"Darwin123" <drosen0...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >>>news:83cea469-8fa8-400c-8dd6-ab5883938bce(a)t41g2000yqt.googlegroups.com....
> >>>> On Mar 2, 5:07 am, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote:
> >>>>> On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 16:55:43 -0800 (PST), Darwin123
> >>>>> <drosen0...(a)yahoo.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>> >On Mar 1, 3:27 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_u> wrote:
> >>>>> >> "Darwin123" <drosen0...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >>>>> >>news:6dc32653-9799-4934-815a-04353b89a715(a)z11g2000yqz.googlegroups.com...
> >>>>> >> On Feb 27, 4:58 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_u>
> >>>>> >> wrote:
>
> >>>>> >> > "vincen...(a)yahoo.com" <datashap...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >>>>> >> >news:87a0b5ca-9cdb-42df-84cf-2ef3811e6a71(a)k5g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
>
> >>>>> >> > intelligent mammals living in the sea cannot be aware
> >>>>> >> > of stars,
>
> >>>>> >> Yes, drosen, that's right.
>
> >>>>> >Why is this right?
> >>>>> >Mammals stick their head out of water or they die. They have eyes to
> >>>>> >see.
> >>>>> >Dolphins see out of the water. Otherwise, they couldn't do all those
> >>>>> >tricks.
> >>>>> >Why wouldn't dolphins be aware of stars?
>
> >>>>> They probably would not be because like most animals, they don't see
> >>>>> objects
> >>>>> that are not moving....but I could be wrong about that.
> >>>>       Most mammals are aware of things that aren't moving. Anyone who
> >>>> plays with a dog knows that the animals recognizes pthers, even when
> >>>> they aren't moving.
> >>>>     I heard that frogs can only see something that is moving. The
> >>>> neural circuits in their eyes subtract the stationary background.
> >>>>      Other animals use their sense of sight in producing camouflage.
> >>>> Chameleons, flounder and octopuses change color to match their
> >>>> stationary background. Octopuses even change shapes to match nearby
> >>>> stationary objects. I don't think they could do this without
> >>>> recognizing stationary objects.
> >>>>     Birds and crocodilians make nests out of sticks, stones and other
> >>>> objects. I don't think they could do this without seeing things.
> >>>>> As you probably know, humans developed the property know as 'rapid eye
> >>>>> movements' REM. Our eyes are constantly moving so we can see objects
> >>>>> that
> >>>>>  >are at rest.
> >>>>     I don't know if this is the reason for our rapid eye movements. I
> >>>> know that rapid eye movements have been studied for a few decades. I
> >>>> never heard the conclusion that it is for seeing objects at rest.
>
> >>>That's because it is bullshit that Henry made up.
>
> >>>There are eye movements that are indeed rapid (but not called REM .. that
> >>>refers to a stage of sleep where there is involuntary rapid eye moement)
> >>>that allow us to shift our gaze around a scene so we can take in the
> >>>detail
> >>>.. as we only have 'high definition' vision in a very narrow field of
> >>>view
> >>>(the rest is low), so to get a detailed image, we need to keep moving our
> >>>eyes from point-of-interest to point-of-interest.  There's also some less
> >>>rapid eye movements, such as tracking of moving objects, or adjusting the
> >>>eye when we change the angle of our head of body so that we can still
> >>>focus
> >>>on a given part of a scene.
>
> >> Normal REM is continuous but very much smaller....molecular level... than
> >> sleep
> >> REM or abnormal REM
>
> >>>>> >How do you know dolphins aren't aware of the stars?
> >>>>       I asked Androcles. He said that marine mammals aren't aware of
> >>>> the stars. He gave no reason, but referred to them as being adapted to
> >>>> their environment. I don't see how adapting to a marine environment
> >>>> automatically means ignoring the stars, especially by creatures that
> >>>> have to poke their head out of the water. He may be right, but I asked
> >>>> him how he knew.
>
> >>>Androcles obviously communes with the sea creatures.
>
> >> ......only when drunk
>
> > drosen should ask Inert the QUESTION, I need some more idiot names
> > for my web page.
> >  http://androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/QUESTION.htm
>
> Here is the question on your web page, for those who couldn't be bothered to
> look:
>
> Why did Einstein say
> the speed of light from A to B is c-v,
> the speed of light from B to A is c+v,
> the "time" each way is the same?
>
> Here is the answer:
>
> He in fact said nothing like it, and indeed its not even true.
>
> So, now you know.
>
> Any other questions about what Einstein said about SR?

of course the real problem is he doesn't understand closing speed,
among other things.
From: Peter Webb on 3 Mar 2010 05:17
>
> Androcles: Yes. From which hat did Einstein NOT pull his inequality
> http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/figures/img22.gif
> that he did NOT write, dumbfuck?
>

Ummm, its not an inequality. Quite the opposite.

And its not what you put on your website. Why not fix up the quote on your
website so its truthful?


From: Henry Wilson DSc on 4 Mar 2010 16:00
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 01:51:55 -0000, "Androcles" <Headmaster(a)Hogwarts.physics_u>
wrote:

>
>"Henry Wilson DSc" <..@..> wrote in message
>news:hslto5tigmrubb4arhm96f3f5jgv1e8k2p(a)4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 21:01:25 -0000, "Androcles"
>> <Headmaster(a)Hogwarts.physics_u>

>>>>
>>>> I have. She's a total waste of time.
>>>>
>>>On the main Outlook Express page,
>>>under Tools,
>>>under Message Rules...,
>>>under Blocked Senders List...,
>>>how many names do you have?
>>
>> I don't use outlook express. I avoid microsoft where possible.
>>
>Cheapskate...

Google chrome is much better than IE.
Mozilla thunderbird is better than outlook express.....and all free....


Henry Wilson...

........provider of free physics lessons
From: Androcles on 4 Mar 2010 16:40

"Henry Wilson DSc" <..@..> wrote in message
news:jo70p55bg8jm7hn87lbt71eek30sol50l2(a)4ax.com...
> On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 01:51:55 -0000, "Androcles"
> <Headmaster(a)Hogwarts.physics_u>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Henry Wilson DSc" <..@..> wrote in message
>>news:hslto5tigmrubb4arhm96f3f5jgv1e8k2p(a)4ax.com...
>>> On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 21:01:25 -0000, "Androcles"
>>> <Headmaster(a)Hogwarts.physics_u>
>
>>>>>
>>>>> I have. She's a total waste of time.
>>>>>
>>>>On the main Outlook Express page,
>>>>under Tools,
>>>>under Message Rules...,
>>>>under Blocked Senders List...,
>>>>how many names do you have?
>>>
>>> I don't use outlook express. I avoid microsoft where possible.
>>>
>>Cheapskate...
>
> Google chrome is much better than IE.

Bwhahahahaha! it doesn't even have a Google search bar!

> Mozilla thunderbird is better than outlook express.....and all free....

Is that why you can't tell me how many names are in your kill-file?



From: Henry Wilson DSc on 4 Mar 2010 18:03
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 21:40:12 -0000, "Androcles" <Headmaster(a)Hogwarts.physics_u>
wrote:

>
>"Henry Wilson DSc" <..@..> wrote in message
>news:jo70p55bg8jm7hn87lbt71eek30sol50l2(a)4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 01:51:55 -0000, "Androcles"
>> <Headmaster(a)Hogwarts.physics_u>
>> wrote:

>>>>>>
>>>>>On the main Outlook Express page,
>>>>>under Tools,
>>>>>under Message Rules...,
>>>>>under Blocked Senders List...,
>>>>>how many names do you have?
>>>>
>>>> I don't use outlook express. I avoid microsoft where possible.
>>>>
>>>Cheapskate...
>>
>> Google chrome is much better than IE.
>
>Bwhahahahaha! it doesn't even have a Google search bar!

You are terribly backward.
The URL acts as search bar. Just type in the subject and up come all the
references

>> Mozilla thunderbird is better than outlook express.....and all free....
>
>Is that why you can't tell me how many names are in your kill-file?

I don't need one. I just ignore people who annoy me too much.

Henry Wilson...

........provider of free physics lessons
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: Sagnac Revisited. Why Paul and Awilson are Hopelessly Wrong.
Next: The electron is not a point.