From: b on 8 Dec 2008 18:29 On 8 dic, 11:21, "Arfa Daily" <arfa.da...(a)ntlworld.com> wrote: Thing is, the > stuff is so cheap now that it's hardly worth worrying about service once the > warranty is out. I was looking just the other day at a 22" fully featured > LCD TV for my newly remodelled kitchen. Built in Freeview receiver, HD, > 1000:1 contrast ratio etc etc. UK£179 ! That was from Argos and was some > 'never-heard-of' brand, and you would probably say that being in the trade, > I ought to know better, but c'mon ... 179 quid ?? Got to be worth a punt at > that hasn't it ? Anything lost really, if it's naffed-out after 2 years ? > > Arfa Arfa, I sympathise with what you say here, and from a purely practical consumer standpoint it is hard to disagree. However, this throwaway approach is somewhat abhorrent, and has environmental costs which are borne by us all, through taxes for waste treatment and public recycling schemes - the manufacturers have only a limited liability for what happens to their shoddy junk when it expires. A lot of time and money are needed to deal with the after effects of this mentality. And worse still, it is particularly the poorer folk in the third world who bear the brunt - the drive for more raw materials (metals, minerals etc) leads to civil wars and instability in places like the congo for example. To keep the costs of our monitors, tvs and dvds down, whole countries end up being privatized (or should that be privateered!) and the wealth from their resources exported. It's not only the production process, but hazardous e-waste from the first world often ends up in slums in India and Nigeria where the local water supplies are contaminated....the list really is almost endless when you look into it a bit. Anyway, not having a pop at you, my intention is just to comment on the situation we're all in. but I think more people should be aware that their buying decisions do have consequences, affecting people unseen by them. B
From: Arfa Daily on 8 Dec 2008 20:38 "b" <reverend_rogers(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:6eaa30cf-be0e-4475-a162-28b9d0eee8b8(a)v15g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... On 8 dic, 11:21, "Arfa Daily" <arfa.da...(a)ntlworld.com> wrote: Thing is, the > stuff is so cheap now that it's hardly worth worrying about service once > the > warranty is out. I was looking just the other day at a 22" fully featured > LCD TV for my newly remodelled kitchen. Built in Freeview receiver, HD, > 1000:1 contrast ratio etc etc. UK�179 ! That was from Argos and was some > 'never-heard-of' brand, and you would probably say that being in the > trade, > I ought to know better, but c'mon ... 179 quid ?? Got to be worth a punt > at > that hasn't it ? Anything lost really, if it's naffed-out after 2 years ? > > Arfa Arfa, I sympathise with what you say here, and from a purely practical consumer standpoint it is hard to disagree. However, this throwaway approach is somewhat abhorrent, and has environmental costs which are borne by us all, through taxes for waste treatment and public recycling schemes - the manufacturers have only a limited liability for what happens to their shoddy junk when it expires. A lot of time and money are needed to deal with the after effects of this mentality. And worse still, it is particularly the poorer folk in the third world who bear the brunt - the drive for more raw materials (metals, minerals etc) leads to civil wars and instability in places like the congo for example. To keep the costs of our monitors, tvs and dvds down, whole countries end up being privatized (or should that be privateered!) and the wealth from their resources exported. It's not only the production process, but hazardous e-waste from the first world often ends up in slums in India and Nigeria where the local water supplies are contaminated....the list really is almost endless when you look into it a bit. Anyway, not having a pop at you, my intention is just to comment on the situation we're all in. but I think more people should be aware that their buying decisions do have consequences, affecting people unseen by them. B I hear what you're saying, and of course, I agree in principle. However, I have to make a living repairing this junk, and it is unfortunately necessary to make the call that a piece of kit is not worth repairing, more and more often these days. Just think about it. If you own a TescoSonic home cinema system and it stops reading discs, you are probably going to bring it to someone like me. Before we even start, you are going to baulk at having to pay my time to look at it. Then when I tell you that I can't get the laser that it needs anyway, you are just going to chuck it in the bin, and buy another with a shiny new 2 year warranty on it. Even worse is when you pay a coupla hundred quid for say a Panasonic system, and that one fails just out of warranty. This time, I can get the laser from Pan, but it's going to cost you �115 trade, and then I'm going to charge you another 35 quid to fit it. The sums just don't work out. Not your fault. Not mine. Just the way it is now. At least the legislation and basic structures are now in place to recycle this stuff,(weee directive) and it is the manufacturers who are responsible for the costs of this, not the taxpayer directly (although I guess that the manufacturers will be building the costs into their wholesale prices to their distributors) It is also a little unfair to level criticisms at the consumer and the repair trade, for causing the stuff to go to an early grave. This should be levelled at the manufacturers. It's also not my fault, or yours, that kit gets shipped to third world countries for dismantling, and that the job is not done in a way that preserves their environment. If you feel really strongly about it, you should be lobbying the governments that allow the recycling directives to be implemented in this less-than-ideal way. Oh, and you're OK. I know that you're not having a go at me ... d;~} Arfa
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Old analog meters Next: Incomprehensible industrial schematic |