Prev: W32.Wecorl.a (or Variant) Infection across enterprise
Next: computer suddenly crawls--any ideas
From: littlecharlie on 21 Apr 2010 20:28
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/36694120/ns/technology_and_science-tech_and_gadgets/

I have no beef with McAfee just saw this on MSNBC.

Personally I am very satisfied with NIS 2010..although conceivably it
could happen to any AV vendor..but hey wait..don't they do a simple
test run first to validate an update they send all over the world?

The article speculates that hundreds of thousands of computers were
put in a endless reboot cycle from this bad update.
From: David H. Lipman on 21 Apr 2010 21:12
From: <littlecharlie(a)home.edu>

And you didn't see the post right before yours ?

"W32.Wecorl.a (or Variant) Infection across enterprise"


--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp


From: FromTheRafters on 21 Apr 2010 21:56
<littlecharlie(a)home.edu> wrote in message
news:vo5vs5dvvbvg8dolnuhkjq29s1sfvabo7g(a)4ax.com...
> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/36694120/ns/technology_and_science-tech_and_gadgets/
>
> I have no beef with McAfee just saw this on MSNBC.
>
> Personally I am very satisfied with NIS 2010..although conceivably it
> could happen to any AV vendor..but hey wait..don't they do a simple
> test run first to validate an update they send all over the world?

As the importance of timely updates increases (narrowing the zero-day
window), the risk of FP havoc increases (Q what?).


 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: W32.Wecorl.a (or Variant) Infection across enterprise
Next: computer suddenly crawls--any ideas