Prev: Sendmail permissions
Next: Hold all outgoing emails for x minutes before sending
From: Grant Taylor on 10 May 2010 01:21
D. Stussy wrote:
> That's his choice.

Agreed.

> The RFC way of sending the message is that if all recipients are
> BCC'ed, the "Bcc:" header is to appear in the message with a blank
> RHS. This is the only case where a blank header RHS is permitted.
> Therefore, the message is NOT lacking a recipient header.

Hum.

I wonder how different spam filters would handle a BCC: header that was
blank. - I may have to try this.

I'm betting that it would be better (from the the point of view of the
mis-configured / mis-programmed filters) to have the sender be the only
recipient in the To: header. Even if the To: header was like this:

To: "Friends of Sender" <sender(a)domain.tld>



Grant. . . .
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: Sendmail permissions
Next: Hold all outgoing emails for x minutes before sending