Micpre of Graham
in [Design]
|
From: Eeyore on 25 Mar 2007 16:00 Fred Bloggs wrote: > Michael A. Terrell wrote: > > Fred Bartoli wrote: > > > >>Isn't PSD *power* spectral density? > > > > In Graham's case its "Petty, Snide Donkey" ;-) > > No- it is Petty Simpleton's Demise... I'm waiting for your design that outperforms mine. You see, you can't do it can you ? Graham
From: John Larkin on 25 Mar 2007 17:20 On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 12:02:12 -0000, "Ian" <ian_bucknerNOT(a)agilent.com> wrote: > >"John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message >news:n7c603p8dpud39oa9kgn5oocjfcb78khe1(a)4ax.com... >> On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 22:30:20 +0000, Eeyore >> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>John Larkin wrote: >>> ><snip> >> >> I still think carbons may have some shotty >> behavior. >> >> John >> >I thought you misspelt that for a minute... > >Regards > Ian > >;-) > My doctor told me I had "shotty lymph nodes". He pronounced it very carefully. John
From: Fred Bloggs on 25 Mar 2007 18:29 Eeyore wrote: > > Fred Bloggs wrote: > > >>Michael A. Terrell wrote: >> >>>Fred Bartoli wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Isn't PSD *power* spectral density? >>> >>> In Graham's case its "Petty, Snide Donkey" ;-) >> >>No- it is Petty Simpleton's Demise... > > > I'm waiting for your design that outperforms mine. > > You see, you can't do it can you ? > > Graham > > Oh I most certainly can, and have, but I refuse to publish non-obvious material on USENET, so there.
From: Eeyore on 25 Mar 2007 19:17 Fred Bloggs wrote: > Eeyore wrote: > > Fred Bloggs wrote: > >>Michael A. Terrell wrote: > >>>Fred Bartoli wrote: > >>> > >>>>Isn't PSD *power* spectral density? > >>> > >>> In Graham's case its "Petty, Snide Donkey" ;-) > >> > >>No- it is Petty Simpleton's Demise... > > > > I'm waiting for your design that outperforms mine. > > > > You see, you can't do it can you ? > > Oh I most certainly can, and have, but I refuse to publish non-obvious > material on USENET, so there. Exactly. You're all bluster. I bet you'd miss the requirements anyway. Graham
From: Fred Bloggs on 26 Mar 2007 04:49
Eeyore wrote: > > Fred Bloggs wrote: > > >>Eeyore wrote: >> >>>Fred Bloggs wrote: >>> >>>>Michael A. Terrell wrote: >>>> >>>>>Fred Bartoli wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Isn't PSD *power* spectral density? >>>>> >>>>> In Graham's case its "Petty, Snide Donkey" ;-) >>>> >>>>No- it is Petty Simpleton's Demise... >>> >>>I'm waiting for your design that outperforms mine. >>> >>>You see, you can't do it can you ? >> >>Oh I most certainly can, and have, but I refuse to publish non-obvious >>material on USENET, so there. > > > Exactly. > > You're all bluster. I bet you'd miss the requirements anyway. > > Graham > > Nah- you were too dumb to even understand the circuit you plagiarized and your commentary was, and continues to be, laughable. |