From: Jim Thompson on 17 Dec 2009 17:59 On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:40:37 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > >Eeyore wrote: >> >> Michael A. Terrell wrote: >> > krw wrote: >> >> On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:29:21 +1100, "Phil Allison" <phil_a(a)tpg.com.au> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> "krw" >> >>>> Some "dynamics" are really electrets in drag. >> >>> >> >>> ** Totally stupid bullshit. >> >>> >> >> In fact, you are. You and DimBulb; a perfect pair. >> > >> > >> > Just don't try to seperate them. You know what happens when you try >> > to divide zero by zero. >> >> So, you're as thick as 'krw' are you ? >> >> Graham > > > That's it. Change the subject when tou can't do anything else. >Typical loser attack. Eeyore was essentially history, then along comes the dorko twins to feed the troll. That's OK. Since my filter scheme relies on a "key" file rather than having to change the program, I see all kinds of possibilities for even better troll/troll-feeder filtering ;-) ...Jim Thompson -- | James E.Thompson, CTO | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | | | Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat | | E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 | Help save the environment! Please dispose of socialism properly!
From: Phil Allison on 17 Dec 2009 18:14 "George Herold" whit3rd "> I'm not happy paralleling the (FET) outputs; seems like the DC > levels would interact poorly." Hmm, can't you just AC couple them into the opamp? ** Yep - as I have already said, there will be an improved s/n ratio as a result. When several similar mic capsules are paralled - the random noise voltage drops, compared to one. However, the signal output will remain essentially the same (as from one) long as the capsules are sited together in a directional array. This simple fact has got some here bamboozled. ...... Phil
From: krw on 17 Dec 2009 18:59 On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:39:37 +1100, "Phil Allison" <phil_a(a)tpg.com.au> wrote: > >"krw" >> >>>Provide a link to one of these 'electret dynamics' or SHUT UP ! >> >> Wow, a trio of DimBulbs. We've hit the mother load! > >** Totally stupid bullshit. > > Why don't ya go drop dead - > > you VILE LYING pile of sub human GARBAGE. Yep! A DimBulb clone.
From: krw on 17 Dec 2009 19:03 On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 03:05:54 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > >krw wrote: >> >> On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:37:10 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell" >> <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote: >> >> > >> >krw wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:29:21 +1100, "Phil Allison" <phil_a(a)tpg.com.au> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > >> >> >"krw" >> >> >> >> >> >> Some "dynamics" are really electrets in drag. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >** Totally stupid bullshit. >> >> > >> >> In fact, you are. You and DimBulb; a perfect pair. >> > >> > >> > Just don't try to seperate them. You know what happens when you try >> >to divide zero by zero. >> >> You get a DimBulb Donkey? <shudder> > > > Or a black hole. Allison?
From: Michael A. Terrell on 18 Dec 2009 05:44
krw wrote: > > On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 03:05:54 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell" > <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > > > > >krw wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:37:10 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell" > >> <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > >> > >> > > >> >krw wrote: > >> >> > >> >> On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:29:21 +1100, "Phil Allison" <phil_a(a)tpg.com.au> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> >"krw" > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Some "dynamics" are really electrets in drag. > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >** Totally stupid bullshit. > >> >> > > >> >> In fact, you are. You and DimBulb; a perfect pair. > >> > > >> > > >> > Just don't try to seperate them. You know what happens when you try > >> >to divide zero by zero. > >> > >> You get a DimBulb Donkey? <shudder> > > > > > > Or a black hole. > > Allison? That would be a 'black ho', wouldn't it? -- Offworld checks no longer accepted! |