From: Jim Thompson on
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:40:37 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
<mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>Eeyore wrote:
>>
>> Michael A. Terrell wrote:
>> > krw wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:29:21 +1100, "Phil Allison" <phil_a(a)tpg.com.au>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> "krw"
>> >>>> Some "dynamics" are really electrets in drag.
>> >>>
>> >>> ** Totally stupid bullshit.
>> >>>
>> >> In fact, you are. You and DimBulb; a perfect pair.
>> >
>> >
>> > Just don't try to seperate them. You know what happens when you try
>> > to divide zero by zero.
>>
>> So, you're as thick as 'krw' are you ?
>>
>> Graham
>
>
> That's it. Change the subject when tou can't do anything else.
>Typical loser attack.

Eeyore was essentially history, then along comes the dorko twins to
feed the troll.

That's OK. Since my filter scheme relies on a "key" file rather than
having to change the program, I see all kinds of possibilities for
even better troll/troll-feeder filtering ;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, CTO | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

Help save the environment!
Please dispose of socialism properly!
From: Phil Allison on

"George Herold"
whit3rd

"> I'm not happy paralleling the (FET) outputs; seems like the DC
> levels would interact poorly."

Hmm, can't you just AC couple them into the opamp?


** Yep - as I have already said, there will be an improved s/n ratio as a
result.

When several similar mic capsules are paralled - the random noise voltage
drops, compared to one. However, the signal output will remain essentially
the same (as from one) long as the capsules are sited together in a
directional array.

This simple fact has got some here bamboozled.




...... Phil


From: krw on
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:39:37 +1100, "Phil Allison" <phil_a(a)tpg.com.au>
wrote:

>
>"krw"
>>
>>>Provide a link to one of these 'electret dynamics' or SHUT UP !
>>
>> Wow, a trio of DimBulbs. We've hit the mother load!
>
>** Totally stupid bullshit.
>
> Why don't ya go drop dead -
>
> you VILE LYING pile of sub human GARBAGE.

Yep! A DimBulb clone.

From: krw on
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 03:05:54 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
<mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>krw wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:37:10 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
>> <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >krw wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:29:21 +1100, "Phil Allison" <phil_a(a)tpg.com.au>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >"krw"
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Some "dynamics" are really electrets in drag.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >** Totally stupid bullshit.
>> >> >
>> >> In fact, you are. You and DimBulb; a perfect pair.
>> >
>> >
>> > Just don't try to seperate them. You know what happens when you try
>> >to divide zero by zero.
>>
>> You get a DimBulb Donkey? <shudder>
>
>
> Or a black hole.

Allison?
From: Michael A. Terrell on

krw wrote:
>
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 03:05:54 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
> <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >krw wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:37:10 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
> >> <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >krw wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:29:21 +1100, "Phil Allison" <phil_a(a)tpg.com.au>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >"krw"
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Some "dynamics" are really electrets in drag.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >** Totally stupid bullshit.
> >> >> >
> >> >> In fact, you are. You and DimBulb; a perfect pair.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Just don't try to seperate them. You know what happens when you try
> >> >to divide zero by zero.
> >>
> >> You get a DimBulb Donkey? <shudder>
> >
> >
> > Or a black hole.
>
> Allison?


That would be a 'black ho', wouldn't it?


--
Offworld checks no longer accepted!