Microsoft Image Composite Editor 1.3.5
in [Freeware]
|
From: lol on 25 Jun 2010 08:24 F. Reeware wrote: >(Q) >Microsoft Image Composite Editor is an advanced panoramic image >stitcher. Given a set of overlapping photographs of a scene shot from >a single camera location, the application creates a high-resolution >panorama that seamlessly combines the original images. > >Microsoft Image Composite Editor is provided free of charge and >without official support. >(/Q) > >http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/redmond/groups/ivm/ice/ > >F. Reeware When you've tested it out, please report back comparing it with the other well known free stitcher "autostitch", paying particular attention to size of installation, GUI usability and quality of output. Thanks. lol
From: za kAT on 25 Jun 2010 08:36 On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 14:24:57 +0200, lol wrote: > F. Reeware wrote: > >>(Q) >>Microsoft Image Composite Editor is an advanced panoramic image >>stitcher. Given a set of overlapping photographs of a scene shot from >>a single camera location, the application creates a high-resolution >>panorama that seamlessly combines the original images. >> >>Microsoft Image Composite Editor is provided free of charge and >>without official support. >>(/Q) >> >>http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/redmond/groups/ivm/ice/ >> >>F. Reeware > > > When you've tested it out, please report back comparing it with the > other well known free stitcher "autostitch", paying particular > attention to size of installation, GUI usability and quality of output. If you think autostitch is better, why not just say so? -- zakAT(a)pooh.the.cat - Sergeant Tech-Com, DN38416. Assigned to protect you. You've been targeted for denigration!
From: Caesar Romano on 25 Jun 2010 17:27 On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 14:24:57 +0200, lol <email.franklin(a)yahoo.com.sg> wrote Re Re: Microsoft Image Composite Editor 1.3.5: >F. Reeware wrote: > >>(Q) >>Microsoft Image Composite Editor is an advanced panoramic image >>stitcher. Given a set of overlapping photographs of a scene shot from >>a single camera location, the application creates a high-resolution >>panorama that seamlessly combines the original images. >> >>Microsoft Image Composite Editor is provided free of charge and >>without official support. >>(/Q) >> >>http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/redmond/groups/ivm/ice/ >> >>F. Reeware > > >When you've tested it out, please report back comparing it with the >other well known free stitcher "autostitch", paying particular >attention to size of installation, GUI usability and quality of output. > >Thanks. > >lol I've use AutoStitch <http://cvlab.epfl.ch/~brown/autostitch/autostitch.html> and Hugin <http://hugin.sourceforge.net/> and consider ICE much better and easier to use. The only downside IMO is that ICE requires that .NET stuff. C.R. -- Work is the curse of the drinking class.
From: lol on 25 Jun 2010 17:34 lol wrote: >> When you've tested it out, please report back comparing it with the >> other well known free stitcher "autostitch", paying particular >> attention to size of installation, GUI usability and quality of output. > >If you think autostitch is better, why not just say so? I don't think anything of the sort because I've never used ICE, hence I want some user feedback from someone who has installed and used it because MS programs have a bad habit of taking over one's system with bloat and not working properly. However, several posters in this thread seem to giving it the thumbs up, although I frankly doubt if F.Reeware will have a view on it. lol "You have been targeted for denigration"
From: za kAT on 25 Jun 2010 17:51
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 23:34:24 +0200, lol wrote: > lol wrote: >>> When you've tested it out, please report back comparing it with the >>> other well known free stitcher "autostitch", paying particular >>> attention to size of installation, GUI usability and quality of output. >> >>If you think autostitch is better, why not just say so? > > > I don't think anything of the sort because I've never used ICE, hence I > want some user feedback from someone who has installed and used it > because MS programs have a bad habit of taking over one's system with > bloat and not working properly. However, several posters in this thread > seem to giving it the thumbs up, although I frankly doubt if F.Reeware > will have a view on it. He might tell you to GFY and test it yourself, and report back to us with your findings, paying particular attention to size of installation, GUI usability and quality of output, you snotty sod. Now, get on with it. I want a report on my desk by 9am tomorrow. -- zakAT(a)pooh.the.cat - Sergeant Tech-Com, DN38416. Assigned to protect you. You've been targeted for denigration! |