From: Robert Neville on 27 Jun 2010 12:31 Spent a little time reviewing some changes to my primary bank's web site (a major national financial institution). After a few minutes looking at their new "Money Manager" features, I realized I was looking at a branded version of Mint. While there is no mention of Intuit or Mint, all the Mint features (transaction classification, links to other bank accounts) were all there. From this I deduce that Intuit will follow a similar strategy for Mint as they did with Quicken: Pitch Mint as the retail product unaffiliated with any specific financial institution to consumers and pitch a customized version to banks as a means of holding on to their customers. This has two benefits for Intuit: it continues their three revenue stream strategy (consumer referal fees, bank licensing fees, embedded advertising) and it gives them a way to interface with financial institution account data beyond screen scraping.
From: jslcr1 on 27 Jun 2010 13:43 On Jun 27, 11:31 am, Robert Neville <d...(a)bother.com> wrote: > Spent a little time reviewing some changes to my primary bank's web site (a > major national financial institution). After a few minutes looking at their new > "Money Manager" features, I realized I was looking at a branded version of Mint. > While there is no mention of Intuit or Mint, all the Mint features (transaction > classification, links to other bank accounts) were all there. > > From this I deduce that Intuit will follow a similar strategy for Mint as they > did with Quicken: Pitch Mint as the retail product unaffiliated with any > specific financial institution to consumers and pitch a customized version to > banks as a means of holding on to their customers. > > This has two benefits for Intuit: it continues their three revenue stream > strategy (consumer referal fees, bank licensing fees, embedded advertising) and > it gives them a way to interface with financial institution account data beyond > screen scraping. Which bank? Why would anyone want to use a program that is Cloud based. I for one do not trust leaving my info on someones server. Look at what happened a couple of weeks ago with Intuit. All of their sites went down. Look at Microsoft and and of the patches that they have to come up with on a monthly basis. It is bad enough people are using an online back service and then can not get any support.
From: Robert Neville on 27 Jun 2010 14:40 jslcr1 <jsl1305(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >Which bank? USAA >Why would anyone want to use a program that is Cloud based. >I for one do not trust leaving my info on someones server. I think you need to draw a difference between server based and cloud based. All your financial info is already on your bank's server. When you sign up as a Mint retail customer, they are scraping all your account info into a server they control. Not really a classic definition of cloud based computing in the sense that the data and processing resides on a system controlled by Amazon Web Services and the like. >It is bad enough people are using an online back service and then can >not get any support. That's an issue with your bank, not Intuit.
From: Marty on 27 Jun 2010 15:13 On 6/27/2010 2:40 PM, Robert Neville wrote: > jslcr1<jsl1305(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> Which bank? > > USAA > >> Why would anyone want to use a program that is Cloud based. >> I for one do not trust leaving my info on someones server. > > I think you need to draw a difference between server based and cloud based. All > your financial info is already on your bank's server. When you sign up as a Mint > retail customer, they are scraping all your account info into a server they > control. In my case not true. All of my financial info is not on the banks server. Bank: yes, Vanguard: no, AMEX:no, Credit union credit card: no. Quicken allows me to track all of my financial info from all of my FIs in one place, my computer. That is what I like about Quicken. Marty > > Not really a classic definition of cloud based computing in the sense that the > data and processing resides on a system controlled by Amazon Web Services and > the like. > >> It is bad enough people are using an online back service and then can >> not get any support. > > That's an issue with your bank, not Intuit.
From: Robert Neville on 27 Jun 2010 18:11 Marty <mrmarty(a)attglobal.net> wrote: >Quicken allows me to track all of my financial info from all of my FIs >in one place, my computer. >That is what I like about Quicken. Same here. Unfortunately, we and the others who use Quicken seem to be in the minority...
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: Clearing a transaction in an Asset Account: Split Transaction/QD2010 Next: Scary QD2010 error |