From: Victor Duchovni on 19 Jul 2010 19:40 On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 12:24:19AM +0200, mouss wrote: > Jonathan Tripathy a ?crit : > > [snip] > >> > >> > > > > Now that's a cool feature! > > > > However, I think I'll stick with giving the exchange server an > > "internal" domain, like "exchange.local", as this is what I'm familiar > > with and I have already got this setup to work. > > if you can, avoid ".local". This is not a reserved suffix. instead, use > a subdomain of yours. The ".local" TLD is used with mDNS and in conflict with Microsoft Active Directory for an internal-only TLD. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.local It is better to use "exchange.example.com" for a suitable value of "example.com". -- Viktor.
From: LuKreme on 20 Jul 2010 13:34 On 19-Jul-2010, at 17:40, Victor Duchovni wrote: > > The ".local" TLD is used with mDNS and in conflict with Microsoft Active > Directory for an internal-only TLD. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.local > > It is better to use "exchange.example.com" for a suitable value of > "example.com". But surely only relevant if you have some windoid admin whose setup used ..local. I use .local because Bonjour does 99% of the work for me, and I don't do Windows. -- What are you, Ghouls? There are no dead students here. This week.
From: mouss on 20 Jul 2010 18:37 LuKreme a �crit : > On 19-Jul-2010, at 17:40, Victor Duchovni wrote: >> The ".local" TLD is used with mDNS and in conflict with Microsoft Active >> Directory for an internal-only TLD. >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.local >> >> It is better to use "exchange.example.com" for a suitable value of >> "example.com". > > > But surely only relevant if you have some windoid admin whose setup used .local. > oh please. This has nothing to do with windows. Linuxers are worst at this. > I use .local because Bonjour does 99% of the work for me, and I don't do Windows. > I'll repeat myself. .local is not a reserved suffix. nor is ..localdomain, despite what linuxers seem to believe. using such domains is a hijack. you are telling the IETF: we decided to use these suffixes and you cannot use them anymore. This is unacceptable. chose your camp...
From: Michael Orlitzky on 22 Jul 2010 16:28 On 07/20/2010 06:37 PM, mouss wrote: > LuKreme a �crit : >> On 19-Jul-2010, at 17:40, Victor Duchovni wrote: >>> The ".local" TLD is used with mDNS and in conflict with Microsoft Active >>> Directory for an internal-only TLD. >>> >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.local >>> >>> It is better to use "exchange.example.com" for a suitable value of >>> "example.com". >> >> >> But surely only relevant if you have some windoid admin whose setup used .local. >> > > oh please. This has nothing to do with windows. Linuxers are worst at this. > >> I use .local because Bonjour does 99% of the work for me, and I don't do Windows. >> > > I'll repeat myself. .local is not a reserved suffix. nor is > .localdomain, despite what linuxers seem to believe. using such domains > is a hijack. you are telling the IETF: we decided to use these suffixes > and you cannot use them anymore. This is unacceptable. chose your camp... I know we're getting off-topic, but this has bothered me in the past. What is the alternative here? As far as I know, there are no "correct" reserved domains. Is one bad choice worse than another?
From: Ralf Hildebrandt on 22 Jul 2010 16:32 * Michael Orlitzky <michael(a)orlitzky.com>: > >I'll repeat myself. .local is not a reserved suffix. nor is > >.localdomain, despite what linuxers seem to believe. using such domains > >is a hijack. you are telling the IETF: we decided to use these suffixes > >and you cannot use them anymore. This is unacceptable. chose your camp... > > I know we're getting off-topic, but this has bothered me in the past. > What is the alternative here? As far as I know, there are no > "correct" reserved domains. Is one bad choice worse than another? ..invalid -- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Benjamin Franklin Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962 ralf.hildebrandt(a)charite.de | http://www.charite.de
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: Email Sys Admin, NYC | 80-100k+ Next: PATCH: defer when pipe command dies |