From: John Gonzales on 16 Sep 2009 19:17 Hi, There are numerous examples for using model selection (AIC, etc.) to select the best covariance structure for "proc mixed" models. However, I am interested in ranking models with different fixed effects (not nested). It is my understanding that the REML procedure cannot be used for model selection unless the models are nested. If I use maximum likelihood (ML), the results for the fixed effects can differ considerably from the same model estimated via REML (i.e. same covariance structure and model statement). Is there any procedure for ranking models with non-nested fixed effects using ML? Most examples use the REML procedure, and I am not sure if ML is considered appropriate. I have searched around, but almost all of the model selection examples are for determining the best covariance structure. I am interested in comparing the competing models themselves. cheers.
|
Pages: 1 Prev: SAS and 64 bit systems Next: Whats the best way to run SAS program automatically? |