From: Moe Trin on
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010, in the Usenet newsgroup comp.os.linux.hardware, in article
<a3979dc8-58d4-43bb-8a5e-2e5ce321c22d(a)n5g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>, JTF wrote:

NOTE: Posting from groups.google.com (or some web-forums) dramatically
reduces the chance of your post being seen. Find a real news server.

>(Moe Trin) wrote:

>> On the 15th of each month, there is a posting to the Usenet newsgroups
>> news.announce.newgroups, news.groups, news.lists.misc with the title
>> "List of Big Eight Newsgroups".

>I use Google Groups for this group.

See the note above. The original poster is using eternal-september.org
and I believe they filter all posts from google.

>As I understand it, GG has moderation but many of the groups are
>public newsgroups (like this one) and are not and can not be
>moderated as far as I know.

Google expends absolutely zero effort with Usenet newsgroups, which
is why a number of people filter any posts from google. See the
website 'http://twovoyagers.com/improve-usenet.org/index.html'.
There are a number of free and low-cost alternatives to google that
are not as universally ignored.

That list of 'Big Eight Newsgroups' describes 2269 newsgroups in
the Big Eight (comp.*, humanities.*, misc.*, news.*, rec.*, sci.*,
soc.*, and talk.*) groups. Only 281 are listed as "Moderated". Many
news servers carry additional (bogus) groups in those hierarchies,
for example the server I'm using (giganews) has 4720 groups in
those hierarchies, but generally the extras are not moderated.
The _other_ groups, and alternative hierarchies are likely a similar
ratio. The 'linux.*' hierarchy has 110 groups listed in it's
hierarchy and 103 are moderated (nearly all are mirrors of existing
mailing lists).

Old guy
From: David W. Hodgins on
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:12:55 -0500, Moe Trin <ibuprofin(a)painkiller.example.tld.invalid> wrote:

> See the note above. The original poster is using eternal-september.org
> and I believe they filter all posts from google.

ES does not filter articles posted via google. http://www.usenet4all.se/ used to, although it looks like they
no longer do.

However, many users do filter all articles from google.

Regards, Dave Hodgins

--
Change nomail.afraid.org to ody.ca to reply by email.
(nomail.afraid.org has been set up specifically for
use in usenet. Feel free to use it yourself.)
From: Joe Pfeiffer on
ibuprofin(a)painkiller.example.tld.invalid (Moe Trin) writes:

> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010, in the Usenet newsgroup comp.os.linux.hardware, in article
> <a3979dc8-58d4-43bb-8a5e-2e5ce321c22d(a)n5g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>, JTF wrote:
>
> NOTE: Posting from groups.google.com (or some web-forums) dramatically
> reduces the chance of your post being seen. Find a real news server.
>
>>(Moe Trin) wrote:
>
>>> On the 15th of each month, there is a posting to the Usenet newsgroups
>>> news.announce.newgroups, news.groups, news.lists.misc with the title
>>> "List of Big Eight Newsgroups".
>
>>I use Google Groups for this group.
>
> See the note above. The original poster is using eternal-september.org
> and I believe they filter all posts from google.

Not that I've noticed -- I also use eternal-september.org, and I see
lots of posts from GG (and I don't see the huge volume of GG spam others
report, so they must be doing *some* sort of filtering).
--
As we enjoy great advantages from the inventions of others, we should
be glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours;
and this we should do freely and generously. (Benjamin Franklin)
From: Jon Solberg on
On 2010-02-23, Moe Trin <ibuprofin(a)painkiller.example.tld.invalid> wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010, in the Usenet newsgroup comp.os.linux.hardware,
> in article
><a3979dc8-58d4-43bb-8a5e-2e5ce321c22d(a)n5g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>, JTF wrote:
>
> NOTE: Posting from groups.google.com (or some web-forums) dramatically
> reduces the chance of your post being seen. Find a real news server.

Hear, hear.

>>I use Google Groups for this group.
>
> See the note above. The original poster is using
> eternal-september.org and I believe they filter all posts from google.

I don't think so (if they haven't recently started doing that). However,
many eternal-september _users_ (myself included) filter Google groups
posts.

> [...]

--
Jon Solberg (remove "nospam." from email address).
From: Jon Solberg on
On 2010-02-23, Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer(a)cs.nmsu.edu> wrote:
> ibuprofin(a)painkiller.example.tld.invalid (Moe Trin) writes:
>
>> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010, in the Usenet newsgroup comp.os.linux.hardware,
>> in article
>> <a3979dc8-58d4-43bb-8a5e-2e5ce321c22d(a)n5g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>, JTF wrote:
>>
>> NOTE: Posting from groups.google.com (or some web-forums)
>> dramatically reduces the chance of your post being seen. Find a real
>> news server.
>>
>>>(Moe Trin) wrote:
>>
>>>> On the 15th of each month, there is a posting to the Usenet newsgroups
>>>> news.announce.newgroups, news.groups, news.lists.misc with the title
>>>> "List of Big Eight Newsgroups".
>>
>>>I use Google Groups for this group.
>>
>> See the note above. The original poster is using eternal-september.org
>> and I believe they filter all posts from google.
>
> Not that I've noticed -- I also use eternal-september.org, and I see
> lots of posts from GG (and I don't see the huge volume of GG spam
> others report, so they must be doing *some* sort of filtering).

They do filter on spam. However genuine posts tend to get trough. With
some kind of measure for 'genuine', that is.

--
Jon Solberg (remove "nospam." from email address).