Prev: What the hell, Jerome Drexler?
Next: The age of the universe and the star that came before the Sun
From: sorin on 13 Mar 2010 04:27
Molecular kinetic theory, temperature concept and other modern science
absurdities….

It is considered that kinetic theory of gases lays to the foundation
of modern thermodynamic and to the temperature concept as well.
But are the foundation of kinetic molecular theory so firmly
established and the concept of temperature is so clearly defined as
actual theoreticians tends to believe?
The link with a more extended discussion:
http://www.elkadot.com/thermodynamics/Temperature%20concept.htm

As is presented, the actual thermodynamics is not able to explain few
low level experiments able to be performed in every low level
laboratory.
In the book, kinetic theory of gases is ruled out and a new
explanation for temperature concept is proposed.
It is to be admired the perseverance of actual leaders in physics to
follow a wrong and absurd approach of exact sciences (physics and
chemistry). Probably they are thinking that having the decisional
power they are the keeper of the truth in science. Soon they will
discover another face of their own believing multidimensional
reality……

Best regards,
Sorin Cosofret

From: Jerry on 14 Mar 2010 10:31
On Mar 13, 4:27 am, sorin <sorincosof...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> Molecular kinetic theory, temperature concept and other modern science
> absurdities….
>
> It is considered that kinetic theory of gases lays to the foundation
> of modern thermodynamic and to the temperature concept as well.
> But are the foundation of kinetic molecular theory so firmly
> established and the concept of temperature is so clearly defined as
> actual theoreticians tends to believe?
> The link with a more extended discussion:http://www.elkadot.com/thermodynamics/Temperature%20concept.htm
>
> As is presented, the actual thermodynamics is not able to explain few
> low level experiments able to be performed in every low level
> laboratory.
> In the book, kinetic theory of gases is ruled out and a new
> explanation for temperature concept is proposed.
> It is to be admired the perseverance of actual leaders in physics to
> follow a wrong and absurd approach of exact sciences (physics and
> chemistry). Probably they are thinking that having the decisional
> power they are the keeper of the truth in science. Soon they will
> discover another face of their own believing multidimensional
> reality……
>
> Best regards,
> Sorin Cosofret

Idiot. In the thought experiment depicted in Figures 1 and 2, you
obviously do not understand the difference between a situation
where, acting as a piston, the dividing wall is moved to the
right, versus the ENTIRELY DIFFERENT situation where the dividing
wall just "disappears".

In the first situation, the expanding gas molecules DO WORK
against the moving wall, and consequently cool down.

In the second situation (which is the one that you discuss), they
do not.

Learn about basic kinetic theory before attempting to criticize it.

Jerry
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: What the hell, Jerome Drexler?
Next: The age of the universe and the star that came before the Sun