From: Ouroboros Rex on
On 4/4/2010 10:22 AM, Meteorologist wrote:
> On Apr 4, 1:03 am, richp<travelingman95...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> ...
>> The world is so large that any idiot can find at least 4 crackpots
>> for any bunk.
>
> Do you know any climate science?

You obviously do not, hawking the cosmic ray hoax. lol
From: Ouroboros Rex on
On 4/5/2010 8:20 AM, Meteorologist wrote:
> On Apr 5, 1:26 am, Unum<non...(a)yourbusiness.com> wrote:
>> On 4/5/2010 12:11 AM, Doug Weller wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 08:22:28 -0700 (PDT), in uk.sci.weather, Meteorologist
>>> wrote:
>>
>>>> On Apr 4, 1:03 am, richp<travelingman95...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> ...
>>>>> The world is so large that any idiot can find at least 4 crackpots
>>>>> for any bunk.
>>
>>>> Do you know any climate science?
>>
>>>> David Christainsen
>>
>>> I realise that this will lead to your making more personal attacks on me,
>>> but you have claimed elsewhere in the last few days to be a practicing
>>> meteorologist.
>>> You may have audited a course on meteorology decades ago at MIT, you may
>>> have been a systems integrator, you may know lots about statistics, but
>>> you have never shown any evidence that you have ever passed even one
>>> course on meteorology. It's obviously a hobby of yours but some people
>>> might think from your statements and username that you are more than a
>>> hobbyist but are actually working as a meteorologist.
>>
>>> Doug Weller
>>
>> Don't take him seriously.
>
> I don't take you seriously.
>
>> The guy is some kind of damaged nutjob,
>
> Libel here from Unum.

No, I'll back him up.
From: Ouroboros Rex on
On 4/5/2010 10:07 AM, Meteorologist wrote:
> On Apr 5, 10:08 am, Doug Weller<dwel...(a)ramtops.removethis.co.uk>
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 00:26:54 -0500, in uk.sci.weather, Unum wrote:
>>> On 4/5/2010 12:11 AM, Doug Weller wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 08:22:28 -0700 (PDT), in uk.sci.weather, Meteorologist
>>>> wrote:
>>
>>>>> On Apr 4, 1:03 am, richp<travelingman95...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> The world is so large that any idiot can find at least 4 crackpots
>>>>>> for any bunk.
>>
>>>>> Do you know any climate science?
>>
>>>>> David Christainsen
>>
>>>> I realise that this will lead to your making more personal attacks on me,
>>>> but you have claimed elsewhere in the last few days to be a practicing
>>>> meteorologist.
>>>> You may have audited a course on meteorology decades ago at MIT, you may
>>>> have been a systems integrator, you may know lots about statistics, but
>>>> you have never shown any evidence that you have ever passed even one
>>>> course on meteorology. It's obviously a hobby of yours but some people
>>>> might think from your statements and username that you are more than a
>>>> hobbyist but are actually working as a meteorologist.
>>
>>>> Doug Weller
>>
>>> Don't take him seriously. The guy is some kind of damaged nutjob, has
>>> spammed many newsgroups. He's not a "practicing" anything. His only
>>> objective is to elicit your response. Therefore affirms his existence.
>>
>>> Don't feed the troll.
>>
>> You're probably right, in fact I rarely get involved with any thread he's
>> in.
>
> Why are you here now if not to troll and twit?

You started the thread, idiot.
From: Ouroboros Rex on
On 4/4/2010 10:20 AM, Meteorologist wrote:
> On Apr 4, 12:02 am, Roger Coppock<rcopp...(a)adnc.com> wrote:
>> On Apr 3, 5:15 pm, Meteorologist<dchristain...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> 27-day variation in cloud amount in the
>>> Western Pacific warm pool region �
>>> Y Takahashi, Y Okazaki, M Sato, H �
>>> - Atmos. Chem. �, 2010http://www.atmos-chem-phys.org/10/1577/2010/acp-10-1577-2010.pdf
>>
>> Gee! Declaring that a 27-day variation is a climate trend.
>
> No; re-read the paper; you misunderstand the author.
> He supported his conclusion with evidence. So, take
> your attitude and chuck it.
>
>> Look up the differences between weather and climate.
>
> Why? I already know.
>
>> Then, show us at the correlation between cosmic rays
>> and global mean temperatures for at least the last three
>> solar cycles.
>
> No; do your own homework in the literature and stop
> dropping bunk on me.

You know there is no correlation.
From: Unum on
On 4/5/2010 8:20 AM, Meteorologist wrote:
> On Apr 5, 1:26 am, Unum<non...(a)yourbusiness.com> wrote:
>> On 4/5/2010 12:11 AM, Doug Weller wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 08:22:28 -0700 (PDT), in uk.sci.weather, Meteorologist
>>> wrote:
>>
>>>> On Apr 4, 1:03 am, richp<travelingman95...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> ...
>>>>> The world is so large that any idiot can find at least 4 crackpots
>>>>> for any bunk.
>>
>>>> Do you know any climate science?
>>
>>>> David Christainsen
>>
>>> I realise that this will lead to your making more personal attacks on me,
>>> but you have claimed elsewhere in the last few days to be a practicing
>>> meteorologist.
>>> You may have audited a course on meteorology decades ago at MIT, you may
>>> have been a systems integrator, you may know lots about statistics, but
>>> you have never shown any evidence that you have ever passed even one
>>> course on meteorology. It's obviously a hobby of yours but some people
>>> might think from your statements and username that you are more than a
>>> hobbyist but are actually working as a meteorologist.
>>
>>> Doug Weller
>>
>> Don't take him seriously.
>
> I don't take you seriously.
>
>> The guy is some kind of damaged nutjob,
>
> Libel here from Unum.
>
>> has
>> spammed many newsgroups.
>
> Unum is lying here.

You're spamming many newsgroups right now, you idiot.

>> He's not a "practicing" anything. His only
>> objective is to elicit your response. Therefore affirms his existence.
>
> Purest bunk from Unun.
>
>> Don't feed the troll.
>
> Unun here is the troll; don't feed Unun...
>
> David Christainsen

Lol, I struck a nerve there didn't I.