Prev: Geometrical Interpretation of E=mc2 and "The Tipping Point"
Next: Regionally interconnected turbines could supply power for much ofthe country
From: Ouroboros Rex on 5 Apr 2010 17:08 On 4/4/2010 10:22 AM, Meteorologist wrote: > On Apr 4, 1:03 am, richp<travelingman95...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> ... >> The world is so large that any idiot can find at least 4 crackpots >> for any bunk. > > Do you know any climate science? You obviously do not, hawking the cosmic ray hoax. lol
From: Ouroboros Rex on 5 Apr 2010 17:10 On 4/5/2010 8:20 AM, Meteorologist wrote: > On Apr 5, 1:26 am, Unum<non...(a)yourbusiness.com> wrote: >> On 4/5/2010 12:11 AM, Doug Weller wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 08:22:28 -0700 (PDT), in uk.sci.weather, Meteorologist >>> wrote: >> >>>> On Apr 4, 1:03 am, richp<travelingman95...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> ... >>>>> The world is so large that any idiot can find at least 4 crackpots >>>>> for any bunk. >> >>>> Do you know any climate science? >> >>>> David Christainsen >> >>> I realise that this will lead to your making more personal attacks on me, >>> but you have claimed elsewhere in the last few days to be a practicing >>> meteorologist. >>> You may have audited a course on meteorology decades ago at MIT, you may >>> have been a systems integrator, you may know lots about statistics, but >>> you have never shown any evidence that you have ever passed even one >>> course on meteorology. It's obviously a hobby of yours but some people >>> might think from your statements and username that you are more than a >>> hobbyist but are actually working as a meteorologist. >> >>> Doug Weller >> >> Don't take him seriously. > > I don't take you seriously. > >> The guy is some kind of damaged nutjob, > > Libel here from Unum. No, I'll back him up.
From: Ouroboros Rex on 5 Apr 2010 17:10 On 4/5/2010 10:07 AM, Meteorologist wrote: > On Apr 5, 10:08 am, Doug Weller<dwel...(a)ramtops.removethis.co.uk> > wrote: >> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 00:26:54 -0500, in uk.sci.weather, Unum wrote: >>> On 4/5/2010 12:11 AM, Doug Weller wrote: >>>> On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 08:22:28 -0700 (PDT), in uk.sci.weather, Meteorologist >>>> wrote: >> >>>>> On Apr 4, 1:03 am, richp<travelingman95...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> ... >>>>>> The world is so large that any idiot can find at least 4 crackpots >>>>>> for any bunk. >> >>>>> Do you know any climate science? >> >>>>> David Christainsen >> >>>> I realise that this will lead to your making more personal attacks on me, >>>> but you have claimed elsewhere in the last few days to be a practicing >>>> meteorologist. >>>> You may have audited a course on meteorology decades ago at MIT, you may >>>> have been a systems integrator, you may know lots about statistics, but >>>> you have never shown any evidence that you have ever passed even one >>>> course on meteorology. It's obviously a hobby of yours but some people >>>> might think from your statements and username that you are more than a >>>> hobbyist but are actually working as a meteorologist. >> >>>> Doug Weller >> >>> Don't take him seriously. The guy is some kind of damaged nutjob, has >>> spammed many newsgroups. He's not a "practicing" anything. His only >>> objective is to elicit your response. Therefore affirms his existence. >> >>> Don't feed the troll. >> >> You're probably right, in fact I rarely get involved with any thread he's >> in. > > Why are you here now if not to troll and twit? You started the thread, idiot.
From: Ouroboros Rex on 5 Apr 2010 17:12 On 4/4/2010 10:20 AM, Meteorologist wrote: > On Apr 4, 12:02 am, Roger Coppock<rcopp...(a)adnc.com> wrote: >> On Apr 3, 5:15 pm, Meteorologist<dchristain...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> 27-day variation in cloud amount in the >>> Western Pacific warm pool region � >>> Y Takahashi, Y Okazaki, M Sato, H � >>> - Atmos. Chem. �, 2010http://www.atmos-chem-phys.org/10/1577/2010/acp-10-1577-2010.pdf >> >> Gee! Declaring that a 27-day variation is a climate trend. > > No; re-read the paper; you misunderstand the author. > He supported his conclusion with evidence. So, take > your attitude and chuck it. > >> Look up the differences between weather and climate. > > Why? I already know. > >> Then, show us at the correlation between cosmic rays >> and global mean temperatures for at least the last three >> solar cycles. > > No; do your own homework in the literature and stop > dropping bunk on me. You know there is no correlation.
From: Unum on 5 Apr 2010 19:10
On 4/5/2010 8:20 AM, Meteorologist wrote: > On Apr 5, 1:26 am, Unum<non...(a)yourbusiness.com> wrote: >> On 4/5/2010 12:11 AM, Doug Weller wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 08:22:28 -0700 (PDT), in uk.sci.weather, Meteorologist >>> wrote: >> >>>> On Apr 4, 1:03 am, richp<travelingman95...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> ... >>>>> The world is so large that any idiot can find at least 4 crackpots >>>>> for any bunk. >> >>>> Do you know any climate science? >> >>>> David Christainsen >> >>> I realise that this will lead to your making more personal attacks on me, >>> but you have claimed elsewhere in the last few days to be a practicing >>> meteorologist. >>> You may have audited a course on meteorology decades ago at MIT, you may >>> have been a systems integrator, you may know lots about statistics, but >>> you have never shown any evidence that you have ever passed even one >>> course on meteorology. It's obviously a hobby of yours but some people >>> might think from your statements and username that you are more than a >>> hobbyist but are actually working as a meteorologist. >> >>> Doug Weller >> >> Don't take him seriously. > > I don't take you seriously. > >> The guy is some kind of damaged nutjob, > > Libel here from Unum. > >> has >> spammed many newsgroups. > > Unum is lying here. You're spamming many newsgroups right now, you idiot. >> He's not a "practicing" anything. His only >> objective is to elicit your response. Therefore affirms his existence. > > Purest bunk from Unun. > >> Don't feed the troll. > > Unun here is the troll; don't feed Unun... > > David Christainsen Lol, I struck a nerve there didn't I. |