From: N_Cook on
I can't say I'd noticed them before today
Is there a cross-reference anwhere ? not necessary this time but if the
printed marking is faded/damaged/burnt/ground off, another time

A batch of 1988 MJ150024 with stamped code D14 around a mounting hole
batch of 1988 MJ15025 stamp code D13
1979 MJ15003 double stamped 924 CD

I don't know if UK amp maker "Exposure" uses rebadged Motorola but marked
EXP8P (pnp) and stamped C5 in similar position
EXP8N (npn) stamped C4 in an Exposure VIII of 1988

If anyone else cares to add here a few more they have lying around it may be
useful sometime

--
Diverse Devices, Southampton, England
electronic hints and repair briefs , schematics/manuals list on
http://home.graffiti.net/diverse:graffiti.net/




From: N_Cook on
N_Cook <diverse(a)tcp.co.uk> wrote in message
news:hgfpmb$qia$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
> I can't say I'd noticed them before today
> Is there a cross-reference anwhere ? not necessary this time but if the
> printed marking is faded/damaged/burnt/ground off, another time
>
> A batch of 1988 MJ150024 with stamped code D14 around a mounting hole
> batch of 1988 MJ15025 stamp code D13
> 1979 MJ15003 double stamped 924 CD
>
> I don't know if UK amp maker "Exposure" uses rebadged Motorola but marked
> EXP8P (pnp) and stamped C5 in similar position
> EXP8N (npn) stamped C4 in an Exposure VIII of 1988
>
> If anyone else cares to add here a few more they have lying around it may
be
> useful sometime
>
> --
> Diverse Devices, Southampton, England
> electronic hints and repair briefs , schematics/manuals list on
> http://home.graffiti.net/diverse:graffiti.net/
>
>
>
>

the 924 one may be a supplemental metalwork datecode without the 7,
preceeding the printed datecode of 7927 nand CD is the typecode for that one


From: Michael A. Terrell on

Meat Plow wrote:
>
> On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 11:40:35 -0000, "N_Cook" <diverse(a)tcp.co.uk>wrote:
>
> >I can't say I'd noticed them before today
> >Is there a cross-reference anwhere ? not necessary this time but if the
> >printed marking is faded/damaged/burnt/ground off, another time
> >
> >A batch of 1988 MJ150024 with stamped code D14 around a mounting hole
> >batch of 1988 MJ15025 stamp code D13
> >1979 MJ15003 double stamped 924 CD
> >
> >I don't know if UK amp maker "Exposure" uses rebadged Motorola but marked
> >EXP8P (pnp) and stamped C5 in similar position
> >EXP8N (npn) stamped C4 in an Exposure VIII of 1988
> >
> >If anyone else cares to add here a few more they have lying around it may be
> >useful sometime
>
> My 1100 page 1989 Motorola bipolar power transistor data handbook
> doesn't cover stamp codes. I used to have a bag of 15023/25 but used
> the last pair in a Peavey MX a few months back. Peaver was notorious
> for rebadging MOT parts.


Motorola was always happy to ship parts with a customer's part
number, if you bought enough parts. No need to remark them.

Those numbers he's seeing may indicate the set of tooling used to
seal the TO-3 can for quality control. That way they could track it
back to a particular plant or production line, along with the date
codes.


--
Offworld checks no longer accepted!
From: N_Cook on
Michael A. Terrell <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:NqWdnS-pmY-9K7bWnZ2dnUVZ_h9i4p2d(a)earthlink.com...
>
> Meat Plow wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 11:40:35 -0000, "N_Cook" <diverse(a)tcp.co.uk>wrote:
> >
> > >I can't say I'd noticed them before today
> > >Is there a cross-reference anwhere ? not necessary this time but if the
> > >printed marking is faded/damaged/burnt/ground off, another time
> > >
> > >A batch of 1988 MJ150024 with stamped code D14 around a mounting hole
> > >batch of 1988 MJ15025 stamp code D13
> > >1979 MJ15003 double stamped 924 CD
> > >
> > >I don't know if UK amp maker "Exposure" uses rebadged Motorola but
marked
> > >EXP8P (pnp) and stamped C5 in similar position
> > >EXP8N (npn) stamped C4 in an Exposure VIII of 1988
> > >
> > >If anyone else cares to add here a few more they have lying around it
may be
> > >useful sometime
> >
> > My 1100 page 1989 Motorola bipolar power transistor data handbook
> > doesn't cover stamp codes. I used to have a bag of 15023/25 but used
> > the last pair in a Peavey MX a few months back. Peaver was notorious
> > for rebadging MOT parts.
>
>
> Motorola was always happy to ship parts with a customer's part
> number, if you bought enough parts. No need to remark them.
>
> Those numbers he's seeing may indicate the set of tooling used to
> seal the TO-3 can for quality control. That way they could track it
> back to a particular plant or production line, along with the date
> codes.
>
>
> --
> Offworld checks no longer accepted!


Would there be a correlation between those stamp codes and the printed type
number and so of some use to repair folk or would there be too much
one-to-many mapping rather than 1 to 1? one stamp code used for dozens of
types so not much use outside Motorola.


From: N_Cook on
Michael A. Terrell <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:NqWdnS-pmY-9K7bWnZ2dnUVZ_h9i4p2d(a)earthlink.com...
>
> Meat Plow wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 11:40:35 -0000, "N_Cook" <diverse(a)tcp.co.uk>wrote:
> >
> > >I can't say I'd noticed them before today
> > >Is there a cross-reference anwhere ? not necessary this time but if the
> > >printed marking is faded/damaged/burnt/ground off, another time
> > >
> > >A batch of 1988 MJ150024 with stamped code D14 around a mounting hole
> > >batch of 1988 MJ15025 stamp code D13
> > >1979 MJ15003 double stamped 924 CD
> > >
> > >I don't know if UK amp maker "Exposure" uses rebadged Motorola but
marked
> > >EXP8P (pnp) and stamped C5 in similar position
> > >EXP8N (npn) stamped C4 in an Exposure VIII of 1988
> > >
> > >If anyone else cares to add here a few more they have lying around it
may be
> > >useful sometime
> >
> > My 1100 page 1989 Motorola bipolar power transistor data handbook
> > doesn't cover stamp codes. I used to have a bag of 15023/25 but used
> > the last pair in a Peavey MX a few months back. Peaver was notorious
> > for rebadging MOT parts.
>
>
> Motorola was always happy to ship parts with a customer's part
> number, if you bought enough parts. No need to remark them.
>
> Those numbers he's seeing may indicate the set of tooling used to
> seal the TO-3 can for quality control. That way they could track it
> back to a particular plant or production line, along with the date
> codes.
>
>
> --
> Offworld checks no longer accepted!


In the vintage valve/tube world these
http://www.audiotubes.com/mullcode.htm
small etched codes are very useful where the chalky printed type numbers
have diasappeared off the glass envelopes