Mountain Fun-Guy
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: New photo
Next: Worldcup in Germany Photo Gallery
From: LOL! on 1 Aug 2010 13:40 On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 19:37:55 +0200, Ofnuts <o.f.n.u.t.s(a)la.poste.net> wrote: >On 01/08/2010 19:16, LOL! wrote: > >> >>> The way you post them they are "orphans". They don't bear any copyright >>> or identification, so you haven't done anything to protect them and your >>> lawyers will have a very hard time. And to prove that the original is >>> yours, they will have to show it... >> >> The provenance is clear enough. > >Of course not... they are posted so that we can't identify the owning >flickr account. You post the URL, but nothing says the URL belongs to >any of your multiple noms de trolling. Thanks for showing everyone how stupid you are. LOL!!! > or ... any of their >> other usual resident trolls' childishly manipulative reasons to desperately >> try to get my or anyone's attention. >>>> Now let's watch all the desperately insecure, sheltered-life (basement >>>> life), pretend-photographer DSLR-TROLLS hijack this thread too. >>>> >>>> This is most amusing. You can't buy entertainment this good! >>>> >>>> LOL! LOL!
From: George Kerby on 1 Aug 2010 14:28 On 8/1/10 11:59 AM, in article et9b56hhnhr0bgsijvl4vlc989uf5pht47(a)4ax.com, "LOL!" <lol(a)lolololol.org> wrote: > On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 09:55:00 -0700, Paul Furman <paul-@-edgehill.net> > wrote: > >> Bowser wrote: >>> LOL! wrote: >>> >>>> <http://farm5.static.flickr...> >>>> >>>> [After taking all artsy-fartsy shots, it's always advised to take a few >>>> more typical snapshots while including some known object for size reference >>>> for future documentation purposes. >>> >>> For some reason, all of your photos linked to Flickr are unavailable. >>> I'm shocked. >> >> Straight-on shot of a big yellow shelf mushroom with a dark tree bark >> background and a coin sitting on it for scale. Proof of genius. > > No, these were posted to prove that you are lying, deceitful, and > slanderous trolls. Which they did quite well. That was the only reason for > posting them, no other. > Awwww, you mean it wasn't a self-portrait?!?
From: Bruce on 1 Aug 2010 15:16 On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 12:10:20 -0500, LOL! <lol(a)lolololol.org> wrote: > or ... any of their >other usual resident trolls' childishly manipulative reasons to desperately >try to get my or anyone's attention. As if anyone needs to "get your attention". You are like an ever-present mosquito. Bzzzz. ;-)
From: Bowser on 1 Aug 2010 19:58 On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 11:57:37 -0500, LOL! <lol(a)lolololol.org> wrote: >On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 12:21:47 -0400, Bowser <Canon(a)Nikon.Panny> wrote: > >>On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 11:40:43 -0500, LOL! <lol(a)lol.org> wrote: >> >>> >>>This was an interesting find, growing on the remains of a burnt-stump after >>>a large forest fire devastated the mountain-pass it was found in. The coin >>>placed on it is a quarter, for a size reference. >>> >>><http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4148/4846112569_f1b80f8ce8_b.jpg> >>> >>>[After taking all artsy-fartsy shots, it's always advised to take a few >>>more typical snapshots while including some known object for size reference >>>for future documentation purposes. A little hint for you wannabe nature >>>photographers out there. I generally keep a small stack of metric and inch >>>rulers printed up on transparency material and waterproof papers in my >>>camera pack, inexpensive expendable rulers that can be quickly placed next >>>to any insect or plant for use against any colors or hues or lighting >>>situations.] >>> >>>I safely know about 18 different wild mushrooms for their edibility, many >>>hundreds more for their toxicity. (One fun one that will only make people >>>sick if they also drink any alcohol after the meal. A good prank-'shroom.) >>>Reminding me of a favorite phrase, "There are two kinds of mushroom >>>hunters: smart ones ... and dead ones." I took about 1/3rd of this one (2-3 >>>lbs.) for future meals for that week. Something that no cookbooks anywhere >>>will tell you, this variety of 'shroom has to be saut�ed for about 30 >>>minutes before it becomes tender and succulent. It's not your average, heat >>>butter, fry it, flip it, eat it, type of 'shroom. Fried up with cut-throat >>>trout caught in a nearby stream it was most excellent. >>><http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4130/4846768170_11db88b89d_b.jpg> (This >>>time I had the luxury of a mobile base-camp in the form of a class-B >>>camper, which I also outfitted with solar-panels to power the digital >>>darkroom and wide-bed printer.) >>> >>>Now let's watch all the desperately insecure, sheltered-life (basement >>>life), pretend-photographer DSLR-TROLLS hijack this thread too. >>> >>>This is most amusing. You can't buy entertainment this good! >>> >>>LOL! >> >>For some reason, all of your photos linked to Flickr are unavailable. >>I'm shocked. > >Don't worry. One of your fellow trolls will be along any time to tell >everyone they were removed because I had stolen them, or I removed them >because I was so embarrassed, or they were all shot with DSLRs and I had >lied about smaller sensor cameras performing so well, or ... any of their >other usual resident trolls' childishly manipulative reasons to desperately >try to get my or anyone's attention. > >When in reality, I never leave images up for more than 24 hours. Rarely >longer in special circumstances. Maybe someone will offer to repost them >for you without my permission so I can pursue a lawsuit against them again. >That's always fun when the trolls try that. The problem is, the ones who >have done just that are so poor there's no reward. So in advance I only >show them highly degraded jpg-compressed images they can desperately covet >and beat-off over instead. Any chance you could supply some barf bags prior to your next postings?
From: Bowser on 1 Aug 2010 19:59
On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 19:10:38 +0200, Ofnuts <o.f.n.u.t.s(a)la.poste.net> wrote: >On 01/08/2010 18:57, LOL! wrote: > >> When in reality, I never leave images up for more than 24 hours. Rarely >> longer in special circumstances. Maybe someone will offer to repost them >> for you without my permission so I can pursue a lawsuit against them again. > >The way you post them they are "orphans". They don't bear any copyright >or identification, so you haven't done anything to protect them and your >lawyers will have a very hard time. And to prove that the original is >yours, they will have to show it... No fear, really. Who would steal this trash? |