My 500/4 Nikkor Finally Croaked Today!!
in [Digital Cameras]
|
From: Bill Graham on 29 Jun 2010 20:29 "Savageduck" <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote in message news:2010062900572627544-savageduck1(a)REMOVESPAMmecom... > On 2010-06-29 00:51:49 -0700, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> > said: > >> On 2010-06-28 23:26:05 -0700, "Bill Graham" <weg9(a)comcast.net> said: >> >>> >>> "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote in message >>> news:ANaWn.7942$Z6.3060(a)edtnps82... >>>>>>> There are actually two or three friendly versions of his ID, or at >>>>>>> least that's my suspicion. I haven't filtered them out, and won't >>>>>>> until given reason... >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> It's ironic, TT (The Troll) is one of my favorite posters, as he / she >>>> has displayed some good talent and has useful analytical skills. He / >>>> she / it has given me some good, honest advice in the past, advice I've >>>> appreciated as it's hard to find objective critiques when you're usual >>>> advisors are all too likely to skew their words towards the kind side, >>>> due to their own good-natures, familiar connections, etc... >>>> >>> Which brings up the question, "Exactly what is a troll?" I have come to >>> realize it is anyone with whom you disagree. - No more, & no less....... >> >> Hear is a little reading material for you; >> http://www.flayme.com/troll/#What > > ...and a little more to read; > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_troll > > > -- > Regards, > > Savageduck > Even your Wikipedia article says the definition is subjective.....The posts are stupid/inflammatory/off topic in the eyes of the beholder.....Some people teach by making outlandish statements.....Sort of a "shock therapy" form of getting their students attention....Are these trolls? - I think not. Or, if they are, then I have certainly learned a hell of a lot from trolls.
From: Savageduck on 29 Jun 2010 20:39 On 2010-06-29 17:29:05 -0700, "Bill Graham" <weg9(a)comcast.net> said: > > "Savageduck" <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote in message > news:2010062900572627544-savageduck1(a)REMOVESPAMmecom... >> On 2010-06-29 00:51:49 -0700, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> said: >> >>> On 2010-06-28 23:26:05 -0700, "Bill Graham" <weg9(a)comcast.net> said: >>> >>>> >>>> "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote in message >>>> news:ANaWn.7942$Z6.3060(a)edtnps82... >>>>>>>> There are actually two or three friendly versions of his ID, or at >>>>>>>> least that's my suspicion. I haven't filtered them out, and won't >>>>>>>> until given reason... >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It's ironic, TT (The Troll) is one of my favorite posters, as he / she >>>>> has displayed some good talent and has useful analytical skills. He / >>>>> she / it has given me some good, honest advice in the past, advice I've >>>>> appreciated as it's hard to find objective critiques when you're usual >>>>> advisors are all too likely to skew their words towards the kind side, >>>>> due to their own good-natures, familiar connections, etc... >>>>> >>>> Which brings up the question, "Exactly what is a troll?" I have come to >>>> realize it is anyone with whom you disagree. - No more, & no less....... >>> >>> Hear is a little reading material for you; >>> http://www.flayme.com/troll/#What >> >> ...and a little more to read; >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_troll >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> >> Savageduck >> > > Even your Wikipedia article says the definition is subjective.....The > posts are stupid/inflammatory/off topic in the eyes of the > beholder.....Some people teach by making outlandish statements.....Sort > of a "shock therapy" form of getting their students attention....Are > these trolls? - I think not. Or, if they are, then I have certainly > learned a hell of a lot from trolls. Some may have good intentions, however there are those who's hidden (sometimes not so hidden) intent, or agenda is to disrupt, ridicule, and provoke the other newsgroup participants, inquirers, and contributers. Any benefit they might bring to the group with valid information is discounted by the toxicity of the manner of delivery. ....but you can choose to read, believe, and respond to whatever you want, that is the beauty of Usenet. -- Regards, Savageduck
From: Bill Graham on 29 Jun 2010 20:48 "Savageduck" <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote in message news:2010062917392222503-savageduck1(a)REMOVESPAMmecom... > On 2010-06-29 17:29:05 -0700, "Bill Graham" <weg9(a)comcast.net> said: > >> >> "Savageduck" <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote in message >> news:2010062900572627544-savageduck1(a)REMOVESPAMmecom... >>> On 2010-06-29 00:51:49 -0700, Savageduck >>> <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> said: >>> >>>> On 2010-06-28 23:26:05 -0700, "Bill Graham" <weg9(a)comcast.net> said: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote in message >>>>> news:ANaWn.7942$Z6.3060(a)edtnps82... >>>>>>>>> There are actually two or three friendly versions of his ID, or at >>>>>>>>> least that's my suspicion. I haven't filtered them out, and won't >>>>>>>>> until given reason... >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> It's ironic, TT (The Troll) is one of my favorite posters, as he / >>>>>> she has displayed some good talent and has useful analytical skills. >>>>>> He / she / it has given me some good, honest advice in the past, >>>>>> advice I've appreciated as it's hard to find objective critiques when >>>>>> you're usual advisors are all too likely to skew their words towards >>>>>> the kind side, due to their own good-natures, familiar connections, >>>>>> etc... >>>>>> >>>>> Which brings up the question, "Exactly what is a troll?" I have come >>>>> to realize it is anyone with whom you disagree. - No more, & no >>>>> less....... >>>> >>>> Hear is a little reading material for you; >>>> http://www.flayme.com/troll/#What >>> >>> ...and a little more to read; >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_troll >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> >>> Savageduck >>> >> >> Even your Wikipedia article says the definition is subjective.....The >> posts are stupid/inflammatory/off topic in the eyes of the >> beholder.....Some people teach by making outlandish statements.....Sort >> of a "shock therapy" form of getting their students attention....Are >> these trolls? - I think not. Or, if they are, then I have certainly >> learned a hell of a lot from trolls. > > Some may have good intentions, however there are those who's hidden > (sometimes not so hidden) intent, or agenda is to disrupt, ridicule, and > provoke the other newsgroup participants, inquirers, and contributers. > Any benefit they might bring to the group with valid information is > discounted by the toxicity of the manner of delivery. > > ...but you can choose to read, believe, and respond to whatever you want, > that is the beauty of Usenet. > -- > Regards, > > Savageduck > I usually do. - And sometimes I get my fingers burned.....But another beauty of Usenet is that the burns are always caused by one's own mind, and are not real burns.....:^)
From: LOL! on 29 Jun 2010 21:17 On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:39:22 -0700, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: >On 2010-06-29 17:29:05 -0700, "Bill Graham" <weg9(a)comcast.net> said: > >> >> "Savageduck" <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote in message >> news:2010062900572627544-savageduck1(a)REMOVESPAMmecom... >>> On 2010-06-29 00:51:49 -0700, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> said: >>> >>>> On 2010-06-28 23:26:05 -0700, "Bill Graham" <weg9(a)comcast.net> said: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote in message >>>>> news:ANaWn.7942$Z6.3060(a)edtnps82... >>>>>>>>> There are actually two or three friendly versions of his ID, or at >>>>>>>>> least that's my suspicion. I haven't filtered them out, and won't >>>>>>>>> until given reason... >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> It's ironic, TT (The Troll) is one of my favorite posters, as he / she >>>>>> has displayed some good talent and has useful analytical skills. He / >>>>>> she / it has given me some good, honest advice in the past, advice I've >>>>>> appreciated as it's hard to find objective critiques when you're usual >>>>>> advisors are all too likely to skew their words towards the kind side, >>>>>> due to their own good-natures, familiar connections, etc... >>>>>> >>>>> Which brings up the question, "Exactly what is a troll?" I have come to >>>>> realize it is anyone with whom you disagree. - No more, & no less....... >>>> >>>> Hear is a little reading material for you; >>>> http://www.flayme.com/troll/#What >>> >>> ...and a little more to read; >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_troll >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> >>> Savageduck >>> >> >> Even your Wikipedia article says the definition is subjective.....The >> posts are stupid/inflammatory/off topic in the eyes of the >> beholder.....Some people teach by making outlandish statements.....Sort >> of a "shock therapy" form of getting their students attention....Are >> these trolls? - I think not. Or, if they are, then I have certainly >> learned a hell of a lot from trolls. > >Some may have good intentions, however there are those who's hidden >(sometimes not so hidden) intent, or agenda is to disrupt, ridicule, >and provoke the other newsgroup participants, inquirers, and >contributers. Oh? You mean just like every last one of your inflammatory topic-hijacking threads that go on endlessly and cry and cry about TROLLS?? Like that? Hint: Ask someone what a mirror is. Then ask them how to use it. YOU FUCKINGLY USELESS TROLL!!!!!!!! LOL!
From: SneakyP on 3 Jul 2010 04:36
"Bill Graham" <weg9(a)comcast.net> wrote in news:X5KdnQzonevjE7fRnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d(a)giganews.com: > "stupid people". ITHM - people who argue, cajole, irritate, harass, annoy, and really shout (*LOOOK AT MEEEEEE), while berating those they are posting to (in almost all cases). HTH HAND -- SneakyP To email me, you know what to do. |