Prev: Incompleteness thru Venn Diagrams
Next: How Can ZFC/PA do much of Math - it Can't Even Prove PA is Consistent (EASY PROOF)
From: Don Stockbauer on 1 Jul 2010 07:06 On Jul 1, 3:47 am, "|-|ercules" <radgray...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > "|-|ercules" <radgray...(a)yahoo.com> wrote > > > In the words of Buzz Aldrin, > > > UP TO INFINITY AND BEYOND! > > Buzz LIGHTYEAR! Buzz LIGHTYEAR! > > Herc Just 2 infinities: 1. Potential. 2. Actualized.
From: Marshall on 1 Jul 2010 11:51 On Jul 1, 4:06 am, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 1, 3:47 am, "|-|ercules" <radgray...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > "|-|ercules" <radgray...(a)yahoo.com> wrote > > > > In the words of Buzz Aldrin, > > > > UP TO INFINITY AND BEYOND! > > > Buzz LIGHTYEAR! Buzz LIGHTYEAR! > > > Herc > > Just 2 infinities: > > 1. Potential. > > 2. Actualized. Wow, the cranks are really coming out in force now. Maybe Herc is the crank messiah! Marshall
From: |-|ercules on 1 Jul 2010 12:05 "Marshall" <marshall.spight(a)gmail.com> wrote > On Jul 1, 4:06 am, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> On Jul 1, 3:47 am, "|-|ercules" <radgray...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> > "|-|ercules" <radgray...(a)yahoo.com> wrote >> >> > > In the words of Buzz Aldrin, >> >> > > UP TO INFINITY AND BEYOND! >> >> > Buzz LIGHTYEAR! Buzz LIGHTYEAR! >> >> > Herc >> >> Just 2 infinities: >> >> 1. Potential. >> >> 2. Actualized. > > Wow, the cranks are really coming out in force now. Maybe Herc > is the crank messiah! > > > Marshall Oh go back to your no box contains the box numbers that don't contain their own boxes numbers, you KNOW that means transfinite theory holds!! Meanwhile, some of you should be smart enough to see all sequences are generated infinite wide is clearly established. This has been in your face for a century fool! As the length of the list of computable reals->oo, the length of all possible digit sequences on the list->oo. What's your explanation for what happens if the list IS infinitely long? All sequences doesn't quite make it to infinity?? It misses some? Herc
From: George Greene on 1 Jul 2010 16:37 On Jul 1, 1:25 am, Aatu Koskensilta <aatu.koskensi...(a)uta.fi> wrote: > George, why do you keep yelling at |-|erc? Surely you know it won't > accomplish anything. No, that is not sure at all. I don't think people should write anyone off as "just" crazy. There is a specific nature of disorder at work here. I'm just investigating, basically. For the record, I think the better question is why OTHER people ARE NOT yelling. I know that part of THAT answer is that they are not temperementally suited to yelling or feel that it demeans the yeller, but I basically have no problem with that -- those of you who think it can't be done are welcome to STAY out of the way of those of us who are doing it. Nevertheless, I am willing to take this intervention as a relevant warning. The fact that you have shown restraint heretofore greatly enhances your credibility. I was aware that perhaps some sort of threshold was Now being reached.
From: George Greene on 1 Jul 2010 16:38
On Jul 1, 8:34 am, Frederick Williams <frederick.willia...(a)tesco.net> wrote: > George keeps yelling at everyone. > therefore George keeps yelling at |-|erc. No, I'm not yelling at everyone. I yell as the need arises, but that doesn't mean I'm yelling at everyone, at least certainly not the way I'm yelling at Herc. > 'Tis Universal Instantiation exemplified, or, if you prefer, Universal > Instantiation instantiated. Nah, 'tis you being a lying dipshit. What else is new? |