My Settings
in [Computer]
|
From: James D. Andrews on 30 Oct 2009 16:05 > James, you have something horribly wrong with your settings. The narrow sentences are his sig. :-) He's not the only one around doing the same. :-) <JS> That's the horrible setting, for sure. Now, if I could fix my settings so that I didn't have to mark my Reply to GoogleGroups postings with <JS> and </JS>, another horrible setting in the universe could be wiped out. </JS> I'm not sure what you mean. Do you mean the size of word wrap? I just increased the number on that. Did that help? I'm trying to get used to this Thunderbird and running into a lot of over-complications of basic stuff.
From: Jeff Strickland on 30 Oct 2009 16:18 "James D. Andrews" <jamesdandrews(a)att.net> wrote in message news:4AEB46EF.3000502(a)att.net... > > James, you have something horribly > wrong with your settings. > > The narrow sentences are his sig. :-) He's not the only one around > doing the same. :-) > > > <JS> > That's the horrible setting, for sure. > > Now, if I could fix my settings so that I didn't have to mark my Reply to > GoogleGroups postings with <JS> and </JS>, another horrible setting in the > universe could be wiped out. > > > </JS> > > > > I'm not sure what you mean. Do you mean the size of word wrap? > > I just increased the number on that. Did that help? > > I'm trying to get used to this Thunderbird and running into a lot of > over-complications of basic stuff. > Yes, the size of the wrap. You'll notice that upon my Reply, your wrap comes out right -- I think.
From: Jeff Strickland on 30 Oct 2009 16:19 "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:hcfhmo$egb$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > > "James D. Andrews" <jamesdandrews(a)att.net> wrote in message > news:4AEB46EF.3000502(a)att.net... >> > James, you have something horribly >> wrong with your settings. >> >> The narrow sentences are his sig. :-) He's not the only one around >> doing the same. :-) >> >> >> <JS> >> That's the horrible setting, for sure. >> >> Now, if I could fix my settings so that I didn't have to mark my Reply to >> GoogleGroups postings with <JS> and </JS>, another horrible setting in >> the >> universe could be wiped out. >> >> >> </JS> >> >> >> >> I'm not sure what you mean. Do you mean the size of word wrap? >> >> I just increased the number on that. Did that help? >> >> I'm trying to get used to this Thunderbird and running into a lot of >> over-complications of basic stuff. >> > > > Yes, the size of the wrap. You'll notice that upon my Reply, your wrap > comes out right -- I think. > Yep. On my Reply, the narrow wrap that you have gets fixed.
From: James D. Andrews on 31 Oct 2009 13:23 Jeff Strickland wrote: > "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:hcfhmo$egb$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> "James D. Andrews" <jamesdandrews(a)att.net> wrote in message >> news:4AEB46EF.3000502(a)att.net... >>>> James, you have something horribly >>> wrong with your settings. >>> >>> The narrow sentences are his sig. :-) He's not the only one around >>> doing the same. :-) >>> >>> >>> <JS> >>> That's the horrible setting, for sure. >>> >>> Now, if I could fix my settings so that I didn't have to mark my Reply to >>> GoogleGroups postings with <JS> and </JS>, another horrible setting in >>> the >>> universe could be wiped out. >>> >>> >>> </JS> >>> >>> >>> >>> I'm not sure what you mean. Do you mean the size of word wrap? >>> >>> I just increased the number on that. Did that help? >>> >>> I'm trying to get used to this Thunderbird and running into a lot of >>> over-complications of basic stuff. >>> >> >> Yes, the size of the wrap. You'll notice that upon my Reply, your wrap >> comes out right -- I think. >> > > > Yep. On my Reply, the narrow wrap that you have gets fixed. > > > > Thanks. Bumped it up 10 more so hopefully that will resolve some problems.
From: Jeff Strickland on 31 Oct 2009 13:26 "James D. Andrews" <jamesdandrews(a)att.net> wrote in message news:hchrr1$1ff8$1(a)adenine.netfront.net... > Jeff Strickland wrote: >> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:hcfhmo$egb$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>> "James D. Andrews" <jamesdandrews(a)att.net> wrote in message >>> news:4AEB46EF.3000502(a)att.net... >>>>> James, you have something horribly >>>> wrong with your settings. >>>> >>>> The narrow sentences are his sig. :-) He's not the only one around >>>> doing the same. :-) >>>> >>>> >>>> <JS> >>>> That's the horrible setting, for sure. >>>> >>>> Now, if I could fix my settings so that I didn't have to mark my Reply >>>> to >>>> GoogleGroups postings with <JS> and </JS>, another horrible setting in >>>> the >>>> universe could be wiped out. >>>> >>>> >>>> </JS> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I'm not sure what you mean. Do you mean the size of word wrap? >>>> >>>> I just increased the number on that. Did that help? >>>> >>>> I'm trying to get used to this Thunderbird and running into a lot of >>>> over-complications of basic stuff. >>>> >>> >>> Yes, the size of the wrap. You'll notice that upon my Reply, your wrap >>> comes out right -- I think. >>> >> >> >> Yep. On my Reply, the narrow wrap that you have gets fixed. >> >> >> >> > > Thanks. Bumped it up 10 more so hopefully that will resolve some > problems. > It's better. I think the setting works best at 76. I remember seeing that number.
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 Prev: How to Remove Hard Drive from Really Old Computer Next: computer shuts off |