From: Ray Fischer on 16 Jun 2010 02:34 Rich <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On Jun 15, 3:31�am, rfisc...(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: >> RichA �<rander3...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >http://dpreview.com/news/1006/10061402nikoniss.asp >> >> Odd. �I didn't know that the "Russian segment of the >> International Space Station" was NASA. > >Americans paid for most of it. Rich is apparently determined to be stupid. He seems to think that the fact that Russia chose to continue with Nikon is somehow affected by who spent what for the ISS. -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net
From: Dr Hfuhruhurr on 16 Jun 2010 07:41 On 16 June, 07:34, rfisc...(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: > Rich <rander3...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >On Jun 15, 3:31 am, rfisc...(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: > >> RichA <rander3...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> >http://dpreview.com/news/1006/10061402nikoniss.asp > > >> Odd. I didn't know that the "Russian segment of the > >> International Space Station" was NASA. > > >Americans paid for most of it. > > Rich is apparently determined to be stupid. He seems to think that > the fact that Russia chose to continue with Nikon is somehow affected > by who spent what for the ISS. As usual :/
|
Pages: 1 Prev: New photo on flickr... Next: When overall competence trumps noise control |